Titans vs. Skins Positives and Negatives.

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13

calia
10-20-2014, 03:42 PM
Colt to start v. Dallas per ESPN. Not a surprise. I wouldn't imagine Gruden would want to do anything to rush back RGIII given what happened to his predecessor.

JoeRedskin
10-20-2014, 03:45 PM
Colt did exactly what he needed to do (Kept the ball safe from the other team, and put the team in position to score enough to win).

Is he our long term answer, almost certainly not, but until RG3 gets better I think he is our best answer

This.

sevier2
10-20-2014, 03:59 PM
Do you think Will Montgomery is a great OL?

No, I do not...?

Evilgrin
10-20-2014, 04:25 PM
Gruden couldn't let KC come in and take the chance he'd throw another int.

Chico23231
10-20-2014, 04:36 PM
Look, I think it's all about the TOs when it comes to KC versus Colt. No matter what else KC is bringing, if he keeps giving it to the other team it does not matter. On Colt's stats: he was playing for the Browns, so it's probably pretty hard to get much in the way of stats there. But we'll see. At this point, we're waiting for RGIII, obviously.

Positives: Breeland, Compton, Garcon and Desean, Reed, Helu (playing well all year, other than that ST f-up), we won a game we should have (after dropping 2 we could have).

Negatives: No sacks (though I thought they got a bit of pressure and several sacks we're erased by questionable penalties), Morris/run game, Orakpo done, Biggers, safeties (as usual), offsides on a punt (WTF!?!?!), Red zone woes.
Still beats losing any day.

Red zone was a big issue. I like to see us go to Reed more...we did once on a kinda poor throw. Also would like to see Roberts more in motion around the end zone, get him moving for sprint out throws or boots going his way.

EARTHQUAKE2689
10-20-2014, 04:39 PM
I'm not knocking Garcon, who made a great play, but Michael Griffin was pathetic on that play. Like Bacarri Rambo pathetic.

To be fair, he and a lot of people have underestimated Garcons speed, which he showed he still has.

WillH
10-20-2014, 04:42 PM
I'm surprised they already named Colt as the starter (if RG3 isn't ready). I thought they'd wait.

If I were Gruden, I would send so many mixed signals about who will start that Dallas wouldn't know how to game plan. I'd be saying:

"RG3 is 'All-In for Dallas Week,' but Cousins might get another chance if he's not ready, we'll see how he and Colt do in practice."

Am I wrong? Why would you show your hand this early?

Meks
10-20-2014, 05:15 PM
Negative - Breeland played well and is improving, the NFL will swiftly suspend him

MTK
10-20-2014, 05:20 PM
I'm surprised they already named Colt as the starter (if RG3 isn't ready). I thought they'd wait.

If I were Gruden, I would send so many mixed signals about who will start that Dallas wouldn't know how to game plan. I'd be saying:

"RG3 is 'All-In for Dallas Week,' but Cousins might get another chance if he's not ready, we'll see how he and Colt do in practice."

Am I wrong? Why would you show your hand this early?

It would only create unnecessary drama, especially if there's no real chance of him returning.

SmootSmack
10-20-2014, 05:44 PM
No, I do not...?

Because he's really the only difference across the offensive line from 2012, so no I don't think the offensive line is to blame for Morrises problems this year. That's just a convenient excuse, in my opinion

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum