KI Skins Fan
04-07-2016, 08:50 AM
No way, because we would most likely get a slew of trade partners at that point.
It would also convolute our RB depth chart.
We need defense defense defense.....
Despite the valuable BPA education you've received free of charge from 30gut, you and others continue to talk about drafting or not drafting certain positions in Round 1 based on need. Shame on you!
Also, "convolute our RB depth chart"? We have no RB depth chart. You mean to tell me that we couldn't use a do-it-all stud at RB? I fear that one of our division rivals will pick him and he'll be kicking our ass for 8-10 years.
And, yes, we do need defense, defense, defense - with as many as 8 of our eventual 12 picks.
But I do (sort of) agree with BPA in Round 1. You just can't let a potential game-changer slip by you because of the position he plays.
It would also convolute our RB depth chart.
We need defense defense defense.....
Despite the valuable BPA education you've received free of charge from 30gut, you and others continue to talk about drafting or not drafting certain positions in Round 1 based on need. Shame on you!
Also, "convolute our RB depth chart"? We have no RB depth chart. You mean to tell me that we couldn't use a do-it-all stud at RB? I fear that one of our division rivals will pick him and he'll be kicking our ass for 8-10 years.
And, yes, we do need defense, defense, defense - with as many as 8 of our eventual 12 picks.
But I do (sort of) agree with BPA in Round 1. You just can't let a potential game-changer slip by you because of the position he plays.