Skins vs Ravens prediction thread

The Giants were 2-0, not legit enough?
Honestly, no. Look at them against Minnesota - they just aren't a good team and I think that's going to get more pronounced as the year goes on.

Sent from my S6 Edge

Honestly, no. Look at them against Minnesota - they just aren't a good team and I think that's going to get more pronounced as the year goes on.

Sent from my S6 Edge

I don't disagree with that, but I do not think the Ravens are a lot better (if at all). They beat the 2-2 Bills 13-7 (and, yes, I know what the Bills just did, but they have had some clunkers too), 0-4 Browns 25-20 (after being down 20-0), 1-3 Jags 19-17 (no real achievement there), and lost to the only team that they have played with a winning record in the 3-1 Raiders (at home) 28-27.

Don't get me wrong, the ravens can definitely beat us. But no one should fear that team. Their great D has had to play the likes of the Bills, Jags, and Browns in the first 4 weeks -- a good defense ought to keep the points and yard totals low.

Here we go again lol. No I realize their record last year, but they still have the same front office and coach that they've been so successful with, and they're off to a solid start this year. I would think last year was an abberration



I think the start of the season was an aberration. Browns, bills , jags. Meh. What did you mean "here we go again"? Lol.
Also their coach is better than ours right now. No doubt. I think our team is better though.

Can it be a code red trap game? Is that even possible?



Not only possible, but extremely dangerous. Lol

Id say to this point we have been more impressive than Baltimore. We beat the Browns worse than them, and the Giants > Bills or Jags. We should have beaten Dallas. They should have beaten the Raiders. None of this means anything on Sunday, but to say the Ravens have been impressive and the Giants and Skins have been less impressive is not accurate imo,...

It all comes down to KC and the run defense. We had receives open on Pittsburgh and he missed the throws. We should have scored 30 on them and we didn't. I think KC is fine; 300 yards 3 TD and 1 INT.

We are not fixing the run defense until next year or the following year. If Norman sits on their number 1 receiver the secondary should be ok.

If we are plus two in turnovers we will win. 31 - 28 nail bitter.

If we are even or lose the turn over battle; Ravens 38 Skins 24.

Well holy crap, I wish McVay would take a look at this (empty backfield geez):

FOOTBALL OUTSIDERS: Innovative Statistics, Intelligent Analysis | 2016 OFFENSIVE LINES (http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ol)

Our OL is number 2 in run blocking based on the F.O. metrics.

Well holy crap, I wish McVay would take a look at this (empty backfield geez):

FOOTBALL OUTSIDERS: Innovative Statistics, Intelligent Analysis | 2016 OFFENSIVE LINES (http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ol)

Our OL is number 2 in run blocking based on the F.O. metrics.

In two years, we have developed a top 10 offensive line. There is a possibility we have two lineman in the Pro Bowl.

Can it be a code red trap game? Is that even possible?

http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2013/10/tim-and-eric-mind-blown.gif

Honestly, no. Look at them against Minnesota - they just aren't a good team and I think that's going to get more pronounced as the year goes on.

Sent from my S6 Edge

Really no shame in losing to the Vikings at home. They're a pretty damn good team.