Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available

So the cards threw some $$ at some point to boost this fool, who cares? Lol... I'm sure he'll end up fine tho.

LOL have to sell man

And even that year he was just avg...

98.3 QB rating, 3:1 TD to INT ratio, 67.6% completion pct. I'll take it.

Moved to new thread.

https://www.nbcsports.com/washington/redskins/how-redskins-emerged-front-runners-trade-josh-rosen

Every Redskins fan should not be surprised at all on this, Rosen has been talked about since Kliff got the job in AZ. We all knew the skins would be serious players and it appears that they are the main player at this point

Not sure where this logic comes from if a player is being traded he must suck.

When was the last time a QB drafted in the top 10 in the prior year was traded away? I am curious if this has ever happened before....and for a lesser value?

This is where the logic comes from.
Quality QB's appreciate in value, bad ones decline.
I don't know if he sucks or not...all I know is a team is giving up on a QB after a single season, not usually a good indicator that they are amazingly impressed....especially if there isn't a single team willing to pay even a first for a top 10 pick PLUS a year of NFL starting experience.

There is something definately wrong here. I just don't know what it is, and no one else does either, except the Cards.

Of course, the Skins could get lucky :) .....We have been waiting for that day for a long time for QB (except RG3 rookie). I think we did get lucky in the last 2 drafts with DL though.....perhaps it happens again?

Teams do dumb stuff all the time, the Cardinals aren’t exactly a model franchise


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

https://twitter.com/danorlovsky7/status/1111402868978782208https://twitter.com/danorlovsky7/status/1111402868978782208

For the Rosen doubters

I must have been the only one who watched him as winning half his games and not getting any signature wins at UCLA. People are too enamored with the numbers he put up.

I'm far from a Rosen fan but given our history of using 2nd rounders in the draft I'd be fine with giving up a 2nd rounder + conditional for Rosen, esp. if we traded down from 15 to recoup a pick or so to help make up for it.

The thought of 16 games of Colt/Keenum is pretty uninspiring. With Rosen at least he gives us a shot of something to build on for the future.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The thought of 16 games of Colt/Keenum is pretty uninspiring. With Rosen at least he gives us a shot of something to build on for the future.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is that in alphabetical order or are you picking Colt as the starter?