How likely is it Ron and the front office will pursue Aaron Rogers?

We wouldn't win in 2022 with Aaron Rodgers. But I've said that already.

And then we'd have a reload and a coaching change on our hands, with few first round picks on the roster.

Why would there be a coaching change after next year? Is AR coming here and playing so badly Ron gets canned?

I'm just going to peace out on this AR stuff for now. I get it, the chance of him choosing to come here is slim to none so why bother.

We wouldn't win in 2022 with Aaron Rodgers. But I've said that already.

And then we'd have a reload and a coaching change on our hands, with few first round picks on the roster.

If Heinicke is the QB next year I see another coaching change and reload in 2023.

Bottom line in all this is WFT (like a lot of other teams) needs a legit QB, and they have to get him however they can and they need to keep trying until they hit on one.

We wouldn't win in 2022 with Aaron Rodgers. But I've said that already.

And then we'd have a reload and a coaching change on our hands, with few first round picks on the roster.


Idk Schneed.

Look at our schedule results.
Chargers - he makes a winning difference.
Giants - we won
Buffalo - L probably still but who knows if we come out stronger with the best quarterback play instead of the worst.
Atl - we won
NO - he makes a winning difference
KC - game was tight until late - but give us the L
GB - he wins
Denver - we absolutely win
TB - we won
Car- we won
Seattle - we won
LV - we won
Dallas - he makes a winning difference
Philly - he makes a winning difference
Dallas - give us the L, though at that point we were giving up
Philly - he makes a winning difference
Giants - we won

Conjecture ? Sure. But it is Aaron fucking Rodgers vs scrubs. If he was our quarterback this year we win 13 games. Don’t underestimate what he could do for us.

And u can take Davis, 2022’s first rounder who obviously had nothing to do with 2021, and Payne off the team and it dont change a thing. In other words if we had traded two first rounders and Payne for AR prior to 2021 - we win 13 games. Maybe more if you look at each individual game we played in 2021.

Man, well when you put it that way...

I’d take AR and wouldn’t think twice

If Heinicke helped the team win 7 games, an elite QB like Rodgers, Russ, or Watson can win 10-14 games with this team.

My only hesitation with Rodgers is that he's about two Joe Rogan podcast appearances from going into the crazy AB zone. And everyone knows the deal with Watson.

That said, there is NO reason why this team shouldn't go all out for any of these three guys.

Idk Schneed.

Look at our schedule results.
Chargers - he makes a winning difference.
Giants - we won
Buffalo - L probably still but who knows if we come out stronger with the best quarterback play instead of the worst.
Atl - we won
NO - he makes a winning difference
KC - game was tight until late - but give us the L
GB - he wins
Denver - we absolutely win
TB - we won
Car- we won
Seattle - we won
LV - we won
Dallas - he makes a winning difference
Philly - he makes a winning difference
Dallas - give us the L, though at that point we were giving up
Philly - he makes a winning difference
Giants - we won

Conjecture ? Sure. But it is Aaron fucking Rodgers vs scrubs. If he was our quarterback this year we win 13 games. Don’t underestimate what he could do for us.

And u can take Davis, 2022’s first rounder who obviously had nothing to do with 2021, and Payne off the team and it dont change a thing. In other words if we had traded two first rounders and Payne for AR prior to 2021 - we win 13 games. Maybe more if you look at each individual game we played in 2021.

You have a 6 win improvement. It's just unreasonable.

Your overall point stands though, he's Aaron Rodgers, he's a HOF player, and we'd be immediately better.

But you've said nothing to refute my point. If you apply your same optimistic view of the difference Rodgers would make, but you substitute in Deshaun Watson or Russell Wilson, how much different are your projected results?

And they wouldn't be 39 going on retired. That's my entire point. The fact that Aaron Rodgers is great is not at all debatable. And neither is the fact that he's fucking old.

You have a 6 win improvement. It's just unreasonable.

Your overall point stands though, he's Aaron Rodgers, he's a HOF player, and we'd be immediately better.

But you've said nothing to refute my point. If you apply your same optimistic view of the difference Rodgers would make, but you substitute in Deshaun Watson or Russell Wilson, how much different are your projected results?

And they wouldn't be 39 going on retired. That's my entire point. The fact that Aaron Rodgers is great is not at all debatable. And neither is the fact that he's fucking old.


Your point I am refuting is “we dont win in 2022 with AR”. Not true.

Tell me which of those 6 games you don’t think we win with Rodgers instead of Taylor or Godfrey last year if it is so unreasonable. We are talking about going from worst to first with quarterback play - 6 game improvement is completely in the realm of reason.

He may be 39, but he is playing at an mvp level. He has 3-4 more great years in him.

That being said Ill take Russ or Watson in a heartbeat too, and I don’t think AR would come here anyway. Just saying if he did we would have been instant SB contenders last year or next year, or the year after that. Ill take one and never worry about my expensive, aged , gave up the farm quarterback ever for one second.

Idk if Rodgers makes us 6 wins better with this roster on O. Is Terry As good as Adams? Probably Not. Our RBs are good but they ain’t Aaron Jones and the packers D was legit all season.

I think he would have won 10 games but that’s it.

Here's a good article from Michael Silver who is good friends with Ron from his days at Cal.

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/michael-silver-provides-look-washington-105707409.html

He's also a freelance writer for the WFT.