BrudLee
10-26-2005, 09:37 AM
Without mentioning them by name...
In Mike Wise's column (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/23/AR2005102301274.html), he wrote the following (emphasis mine):
Some of us were worse than wrong. Columns, call-in shows and fan Web sites were downright nasty. One extremist Web thread took on Gibbs's undying faith in Brunell:
"If Joe Gibbs starts Mark Brunell next Sunday, it will confirm what I have thought since the day we signed the inept quarterback. . . . One fervent Christian favoring another fervent Christian," a post written a year ago read. "Time to break the loyalty, Joe. This isn't church, it's football, and Mark Brunell is the biggest mistake you ever made."
The quoted post can be viewed here (http://extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=76740).
I wonder if it's going to be WaPo policy to dig up old posts at the now-team-owned fansite to make said site look foolish. Looks like the Post-Skins feud is still out there.
In Mike Wise's column (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/23/AR2005102301274.html), he wrote the following (emphasis mine):
Some of us were worse than wrong. Columns, call-in shows and fan Web sites were downright nasty. One extremist Web thread took on Gibbs's undying faith in Brunell:
"If Joe Gibbs starts Mark Brunell next Sunday, it will confirm what I have thought since the day we signed the inept quarterback. . . . One fervent Christian favoring another fervent Christian," a post written a year ago read. "Time to break the loyalty, Joe. This isn't church, it's football, and Mark Brunell is the biggest mistake you ever made."
The quoted post can be viewed here (http://extremeskins.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=76740).
I wonder if it's going to be WaPo policy to dig up old posts at the now-team-owned fansite to make said site look foolish. Looks like the Post-Skins feud is still out there.