Report that Gibbs has talked to postons about winslow

Pages : 1 [2]

skinsfanthru&thru
04-23-2004, 09:00 PM
plus he may be changing some of his offensive schemes to better suit the talent he has. he's already said he's gonna "steal" a few plays and formations here and there from some of the offenses that have been productive over the past few years. kc's offense could be a prime candidate if winslow is taken or even the vikings who utilize kleinsauser pretty well.

JoeRedskin
04-23-2004, 09:02 PM
Personally I think we have enough weapons on offense. But if Gibbs wants Winslow I guess I won't be too disappointed even though I prefer Taylor.

In Gibbs I trust!

The honest to God's truth is, I don't care who they draft - just so long as Gibbs is coaching 'em.

kingerock
04-23-2004, 09:10 PM
I personally would steer clear from both and go for a DT, but like JoeRedskin says, it doesn't matter with Daddy Gibbs at the helm.

SKINSnCANES
04-23-2004, 09:22 PM
Joe Gibbs never had a star receiving hback that would be a threat to send in motion, except when he was in San Diego, and had KW. And whats the big deal about saying Gibbs would have to change his offense, he hasnt coached in over 10 years. He doesnt have an offense anymore. He even said he watched a ton of film of all the teams that were succeeding and has been stealing their plays and adding his own twists to them. Worrying that he will have to adjust is going to be a problem whether he gets KWII or not, but its somethign none of us really worry about.

Cush
04-23-2004, 09:33 PM
Personally I think we have enough weapons on offense

Agree, they should go D. I still don't understand why they had to give Denver a 2nd round pick in the Champ/Portis deal. There will be plently on D linemen available in the 2nd round

SKINSnCANES
04-23-2004, 09:35 PM
because Denver was offered a first and a second for him and they figured champ was just worth a first.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum