![]() |
|
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() | #151 | |
Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 50
Posts: 15,717
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? Quote:
__________________ Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time. | |
![]() | ![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() | #152 |
Pro Bowl Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? Meh......their air force and navy are not the concern anyways AFAIC. Nukes Chemical weapons Their large artillery force. Their large mobile infantry. Those are the four things I would be worried about most.
__________________ REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #153 | ||
Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 50
Posts: 15,717
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? Quote:
Quote:
(I understand they aren't a threat per se because they are aging, and their pilots get an average of 20 hours flying time a year, just numbers that would have to be shot down)
__________________ Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time. | ||
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #154 |
Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 19,807
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? North Korea may have some military numbers, but they couldnt logistically support a war. Fuel and food are expensive. Alot of their vehicles are old too, arent they? |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #155 | |
Pro Bowl Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? Quote:
How many of them are operational? Cause if they cant fly then they are just lawn ornaments. If you look at them on Google earth, thats what they appear to be. And I find it amusing that you would bother to list the AN-2s.
__________________ REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #156 |
Pro Bowl Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? Phear the mighty AN-2. 160 MPH top speed. ![]()
__________________ REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #157 |
Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 50
Posts: 15,717
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? This is why I fear a land war. IF they were to fire off a ton of missiles, then make a dash to SK's front line stocks, the initiative would allow them, most likely to get the needed supplies like fuel and food to keep their military going. I know they don't have a lot of supplies, but EVERY thing in that country is earmarked first and foremost for the military, and they would burn through their supplies in an all out push to get to SK's back stocks. Wouldn't shock me if they have several tunnels that the South hasn't found, (they found 4 across the length of the DMZ), which would allow troops to start behind the frontlines.
__________________ Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #158 |
Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 50
Posts: 15,717
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? lol for the record, I just took the words right off the page, and only so that I could call you Alice :cheeky-sm
__________________ Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #159 | |
Pro Bowl Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? Quote:
They wouldnt be able to keep it but it would be messed us very very badly and set the world on its ear. A lot of Americans (military) and south Koreans would be dead. Say good bye to the KIA factory.
__________________ REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #160 | |
Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 50
Posts: 15,717
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? Quote:
__________________ Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time. | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #161 |
Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 50
Posts: 15,717
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? I agree, and I might put chemical ahead of nukes, because I could see them more likely using them inside SK, then what nukes they do have.
__________________ Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #162 |
Pro Bowl Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? Yep....if the chemical wepaons are artillary capable then just shoot them en masse....wait an hour and invade.
__________________ REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #163 |
Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 19,807
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? Would we use nuclear weapons if they invaded SK? |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #164 |
Living Legend ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Pasadena, Md Age: 50
Posts: 15,717
| no way Obama would authorize nukes for anything less than an attack on the US
__________________ Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #165 |
Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 19,807
| Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer? |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
| |