Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected

Go Back   Warpath > Off-Topic Discussion > Debating with the enemy

Going nuclear in the Senate

Debating with the enemy

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-22-2013, 01:04 PM   #1
The Starter
BaltimoreSkins's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Posts: 1,240
Going nuclear in the Senate

What are peoples thoughts? I find it a touch ironic from Obama's and McConnell's part and I know it isn't a complete relaxation of the filibuster, but I have mixed emotions about this one.
BaltimoreSkins is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-22-2013, 01:08 PM   #2
Chico23231's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 14,208
Re: Going nuclear in the Senate

GOP deserves this because it has been their stratagdy to delay Obama's appointments for no reason other than politics. These posts need to be filled, so eff the GOP. They asked for it.
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2013, 02:58 PM   #3
Puppy Kicker
Daseal's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 32
Posts: 8,295
Re: Going nuclear in the Senate

I like the changes from a completely non-partisan position. I hate the idea of a fillibuster, and especially the frequency in which they have started to happen. According to the CNN article I read: "According to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, the Nevada Democrat who spearheaded Thursday's nuclear option rule change, there have been 168 filibusters of executive and judicial nominations in Senate history, with about half of them occurring during the Obama administration."

That's way too many fillibusters. I would like to see these rules expand to actual legislation, not just political/judicial nominations. Unfortunately, we need rules to force Congress to do their jobs and to make actual decisions on laws. Currently all they do is political posturing and are more concerned with hurting the other party than the good of the American people.
Best. Player. Available.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2013, 03:32 PM   #4
over the mountain's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,166
Re: Going nuclear in the Senate

agree with what has already been said here. i dont like the idea but it seems the repubs really have been the party of no to a historical degree.

not only have they used more than of all total filibusters on president obama the average wait time for a nominated person to fill a vacant position is 2.5 years when the avg is something like 6 mos.

what i dont like is i read one democrat said the repubs would have changed the rule anyway if and when they had control of the senate and presidency.

how about president obama on foreign policy though!

averted a long drawn out occupation in Syria when a strike seemed imminent (which would have greatly escalated tensions all around)

averted all out war with Iran through diplomacy.

Amazing, if we had a repub president we would be replacing afghanistan with syria and iraq and with iran.

just amazing we averted another decade of huge military expenses and US lives.

Ram Rule 5: "Leading up to every kickoff, let's slow-clap it out."
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 06:51 PM   #5
Living Legend
That Guy's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 32
Posts: 16,742
Re: Going nuclear in the Senate

you're silly if you think we'd ever have a boots on the ground war with iran. they have over 70million people. we'd have to re-institute the draft.
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.14250 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25