![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,471
| Re: fantasy projections As much as I love Cooley, I would keep Anquan. That's just a gut feeling. I think with Saunders offense that Cooley will put up good TE numbers. Boldin, though, has pretty much already established himself as a very good receiver. Might want to consider Anquan's knee injury from early last year. I don't think you'll be disappointed with keeping either player.
__________________ "I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #17 |
| The Starter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: KY Age: 44
Posts: 1,277
| Re: fantasy projections I should probably clarify this Keeper League. If I keep Boldin, I give up my 6th round pick and he is my 6th round pick. If I keep Cooley, he is my 13th round pick. I am in a Keeper League where we keep 2 players. My first Keeper is Portis, who I drafted in the 3rd round last year, I will give up my 2nd round pick (last year's round + 1 is how we do it) which is a no brainer to me. I guess my real question is which is a better value, Boldin in round 6 or Cooley in round 13. I guess I am hoping that Warner keeps playing and that Edge down in Arizona makes Boldin better. |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Hill Valley Age: 57
Posts: 13
| Re: fantasy projections Quote:
__________________ I hate manure. | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 18
| Re: fantasy projections If you don't give my almanac back, it's going to wreck the past! |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| RG Glee Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 33
Posts: 7,896
| Re: fantasy projections Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 18
| Re: fantasy projections Portis is the first back on my fantasy selection. With Fauria and Sellers, I see Portis being able to pound it in MUCH easier this year. I think that Alexander and Portis will go blow-for-blow for rushing champ this year. |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Philadelphia, PA Age: 36
Posts: 1,340
| Re: fantasy projections Quote:
You should never expect too much from your TE unless you have Gonzo or Gates. However, Boldin is a guaranteed starter every week for your team.
__________________ "Hail to the Redskins!" and "Fight on State!" | |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 18
| Re: fantasy projections I have Fitz doing more of the scoring than Boldin. |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 30
Posts: 7,758
| Re: fantasy projections Quote:
__________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. | |
| | |
| | #25 |
| The Starter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: KY Age: 44
Posts: 1,277
| Re: fantasy projections We are not able to keep any of our 1st rounders, so they all go back into the "pot". Of the 2nd round to 15th round (which is the rest of the draft) we can keep any player based on where he was drafted last year plus 1 round. I am kinda leaning with most of you. While Cooley would be a steal giving up only my 13 round pick for a starter at TE, Boldin at round 6 is probably better no matter who the QB in Arizona is. You would like to think that Edge would take away opportunities from Larry Fitgerald and Boldin this year, but I still think the Cards will be playing from behind most games and Boldin will get 70-100+ and a TD every week. |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: May 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 9,232
| Re: fantasy projections I think both are steals where they'd get slotted in your draft. Needing 2 WRs makes a little more scarcity there(assuming it isn't a 6 team league or something). On the other hand Cooley is probably comparatively more valuable as a 13th round pick than Boldin with a 6th(again, both are steals though). On the subjective side of things I am a little wary of taking a player whose role is as undetermined as Cooley's. We all assume he is going to occupy a Gonzalez type role in Saudners' offense but we have no evidence to prove that he will or if he does that he will be able to do well with it. I think Boldin is a the best option for sure. |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: May 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 9,232
| Re: fantasy projections You have a good problem. |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: KY Age: 44
Posts: 1,277
| Re: fantasy projections Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #29 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 30
Posts: 7,758
| Re: fantasy projections Quote:
__________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. | |
| | |
| | #30 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: May 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 9,232
| Re: fantasy projections Quote:
I think you need to get two top tier type players there and that probably means WR. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |