![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 170
| Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! Ok i haven't heard anyone talk about this angle on the T.J. Duckect trade. I hate to bring more bad news to this nightmare season but here it goes. from Greatbluedraft report it explains that if our first round picks are signifficantly different than Denver we would exchange them check it out.Great Blue North Draft Report if the season ended we would be like pick 5-6 and they are at about 28. Id say thats signifficant. If this happens I think whoever is in charge of player management needs to be fired. Even if it doesnt they need to be fired for stupidity. Denver must be laughing at us soo hard right now!
__________________ good news for people who like bad news |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #2 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 170
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! sorry it posted twice
__________________ good news for people who like bad news |
| | |
| | #3 |
| The Starter Join Date: Mar 2006 Age: 35
Posts: 1,830
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! F*&k !!!!!!!!!!
__________________ Catch me on YouTube ! http://www.youtube.com/user/DowntimeRB?feature=mhw5 The "punishment" by the league : "It's like getting a ticket for going too fast on a road a week ago and they changed the speed limit today" |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 39
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! Gay town!!!! |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: So. MD Age: 34
Posts: 1,270
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Fighting off The Crazies Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Virginia Beach Age: 39
Posts: 5,280
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! I'm thoroughly confused about this. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 30
Posts: 890
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 8,317
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! Am I in a time-warp? Isn't this issue like 6 months old? |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Banned Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 293
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! Heres what happens: If we end up with a pick that is anywhere near denvers pick we exchange, for instance, if we ended up with the 21st pick and denver had the 29th we would exchange to make up for the duckett deal, we owe denver 260 points on the draft value chart, since we most likely will end up with a top 5 pick or top 10 pick we will not exchange picks because it will go way over the value we owe them, so most likely the difference will be made up with our 5th round pick in 07' and our 3rd in 08', so dont worry about exchanging picks with denver in the first round, there is absolutely no chance this will happen. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| The Starter Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,673
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! If we are the 7th pick or better in the 3rd round, that is all we have to give them
__________________ |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Fayettenam, NC Age: 41
Posts: 806
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! Our front office is a joke. Even if its only a 3rd round pick it wasnt worth it. The trade for TJ shows how panic stricken Danny and Vinny were when portis got hurt. We need to pursue a full time general manager. These thing might not happen with this much regularity if we had proven a Gm. The Danny proved how little he knew about personnel decisions in 2000 and Vinny and Gibbs proved how little they know about personnel decisions this season. If you look at the teams that are consistent in the NFL they dont have big free agent spending sprees and dont trade away draft picks.
__________________ The future is obviously right now! |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Playmaker Join Date: May 2004 Location: MA Age: 32
Posts: 2,836
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! The thing is, getting a backup for Portis turned out to be smart since he ended up being hurt the whole season. Not playing that studly backup is what I don't understand (I'm the first person to point out that we should be playing TJ right?) |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Fayettenam, NC Age: 41
Posts: 806
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! did we really need a backup at the expense of a possible 3rd round pick? Correct me if i am wrong but i think we were deep enough at rb without Tj....rock, mike and ladell...i think that was sufficient...but the real truth about tj is we signed him just to keep him from a divison rival...another example of our poor front office team.
__________________ The future is obviously right now! |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! Sellers isn't a RB, and Rock is, at best, serviceable. Given CP's injury, Duckett is a good move. |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Special Teams Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 136
| Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not! Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |