Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-22-2006, 02:05 PM   #1
Special Teams
 
elamin24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 170
Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

Ok i haven't heard anyone talk about this angle on the T.J. Duckect trade.
I hate to bring more bad news to this nightmare season but here it goes.
from Greatbluedraft report it explains that if our first round picks are signifficantly different than Denver we would exchange them check it out.
Great Blue North Draft Report if the season ended we would be like pick 5-6 and they are at about 28. Id say thats signifficant. If this happens I think whoever is in charge of player management needs to be fired. Even if it doesnt they need to be fired for stupidity. Denver must be laughing at us soo hard right now!
__________________
good news for people who like bad news
elamin24 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-22-2006, 02:07 PM   #2
Special Teams
 
elamin24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 170
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

sorry it posted twice
__________________
good news for people who like bad news
elamin24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 02:13 PM   #3
The Starter
 
MonkFan4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 37
Posts: 1,840
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

F*&k !!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Catch me on YouTube !

http://www.youtube.com/user/DowntimeRB?feature=mhw5

The "punishment" by the league : "It's like getting a ticket for going too fast on a road a week ago and they changed the speed limit today"
MonkFan4Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 02:14 PM   #4
Camp Scrub
 
cookskin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 39
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

Gay town!!!!
cookskin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 02:26 PM   #5
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 35
Posts: 1,318
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

Quote:
Denver will receive compensation from Washington as their part of a deal in which the Broncos sent WR Ashley Lelie to Atlanta and the Falcons sent RB T.J. Duckett to Washington. Depending on how the Broncos and Redskins finish in the final standings, the two teams could exchange first-round picks outright if Denver has a significantly lower pick than the Redskins; the teams could flip-flop their first-rounders and the Broncos get a fourth-rounder in 2008; the teams flip-flop their first-rounders and the Broncos get a third- rounder next year; or the Broncos get a third-rounder in 2007 and a fourth-rounder in 2008.
If by lower they mean "later", then Washington is going to end up with a basically useless first round pick, but it's hard to tell from the wording of the article. If by lower they mean lower draft number, that could work in Washington's favor.
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 02:29 PM   #6
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 40
Posts: 5,293
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

I'm thoroughly confused about this.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 02:49 PM   #7
Impact Rookie
 
VTSkins897's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 890
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
I'm thoroughly confused about this.
me too...

wtf?
VTSkins897 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 02:55 PM   #8
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 35
Posts: 8,317
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

Am I in a time-warp? Isn't this issue like 6 months old?
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 03:03 PM   #9
Registered User
 
GiantsSuck703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 293
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

Heres what happens:
If we end up with a pick that is anywhere near denvers pick we exchange, for instance, if we ended up with the 21st pick and denver had the 29th we would exchange to make up for the duckett deal, we owe denver 260 points on the draft value chart, since we most likely will end up with a top 5 pick or top 10 pick we will not exchange picks because it will go way over the value we owe them, so most likely the difference will be made up with our 5th round pick in 07' and our 3rd in 08', so dont worry about exchanging picks with denver in the first round, there is absolutely no chance this will happen.
GiantsSuck703 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 03:09 PM   #10
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

If we are the 7th pick or better in the 3rd round, that is all we have to give them
__________________

steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 06:26 AM   #11
Impact Rookie
 
vaoutlaws2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fayettenam, NC
Age: 42
Posts: 806
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

Our front office is a joke. Even if its only a 3rd round pick it wasnt worth it. The trade for TJ shows how panic stricken Danny and Vinny were when portis got hurt. We need to pursue a full time general manager. These thing might not happen with this much regularity if we had proven a Gm. The Danny proved how little he knew about personnel decisions in 2000 and Vinny and Gibbs proved how little they know about personnel decisions this season. If you look at the teams that are consistent in the NFL they dont have big free agent spending sprees and dont trade away draft picks.
__________________
The future is obviously right now!
vaoutlaws2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 07:45 AM   #12
Playmaker
 
djnemo65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MA
Age: 33
Posts: 2,836
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

The thing is, getting a backup for Portis turned out to be smart since he ended up being hurt the whole season. Not playing that studly backup is what I don't understand (I'm the first person to point out that we should be playing TJ right?)
djnemo65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 08:23 AM   #13
Impact Rookie
 
vaoutlaws2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fayettenam, NC
Age: 42
Posts: 806
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

did we really need a backup at the expense of a possible 3rd round pick? Correct me if i am wrong but i think we were deep enough at rb without Tj....rock, mike and ladell...i think that was sufficient...but the real truth about tj is we signed him just to keep him from a divison rival...another example of our poor front office team.
__________________
The future is obviously right now!
vaoutlaws2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 09:05 AM   #14
Playmaker
 
onlydarksets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

Sellers isn't a RB, and Rock is, at best, serviceable. Given CP's injury, Duckett is a good move.
onlydarksets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2006, 11:09 AM   #15
Special Teams
 
marius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 136
Re: Well at least we have a good first-rounder! Wait we might not!

Quote:
Originally Posted by vaoutlaws2006 View Post
did we really need a backup at the expense of a possible 3rd round pick? Correct me if i am wrong but i think we were deep enough at rb without Tj....rock, mike and ladell...i think that was sufficient...but the real truth about tj is we signed him just to keep him from a divison rival...another example of our poor front office team.
Yeah, and keeping him from Philly certainly paid off handsomely, didn't it?!?! I'd rather have the draft pick, even now with Portis injured. That third round pick could end up being a starting DT for example. Even though Portis is now out for the season and TJ could play more (but doesn't seem to be for whatever reason) this is still a dumbass trade.
marius is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.39396 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25