|
| |||||||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-18-2007, 12:38 AM
| #121 | |
| Banned  Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 36
Posts: 4,261
| Re: Russell to the skins? Quote:
2. Campbell has demonstrated that he is a NFL quarterback. Russell is an unknown commodity. 3. What do the Redskins have that another team would give them the #1 pick for (and the #1 pick would be the only way that they could get him)? They have one draft pick on the first day. Plus even my 3 week old knows that they need help on defense. Is Russell going to shut down the run? 4. 2007 is essentially Gibbs' last stand. There is no way that he is going to go out on the shoulders of a rookie QB that they would have give away the ranch to acquire. 5. After they dump Arch or Patten or both, they can't afford to pay a #1 pick. | |
|  |
| Advertisements |
|
03-18-2007, 03:52 AM
| #122 |
| MVP  Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: NoVa Age: 24
Posts: 11,178
| Re: Russell to the skins? Really? I also heard the Redskins are after Brady Quinn. They must value qb depth a hell of a lot more than a good d-line. [/sarcasm] |
|
| |
|
03-18-2007, 03:11 PM
| #123 |
| Special Teams  Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 227
| Re: Russell to the skins? russell will not be a skin.campbell is the man nough said. |
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
