![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #76 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 8,317
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? IMHO, Griffin is absolutely dominant when healthy. Unfortunately, he's been injured a lot lately. If he's health again, I'm convinced he'll return to form. |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #77 | |
| Swearinger ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Age: 34
Posts: 12,623
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? Quote:
__________________ Insert witty signature here | |
| | |
| | #78 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? Quote:
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #79 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? Quote:
Stu, who's going to be better if we wait until next year? Because if there is a prospect whos honest to god better than Okoye next year, why not take Okoye this year and that hypothetical player next year. Isn't that what Jacksonville did with Stroud and Henderson? I'd say they are sustaining their defense pretty well.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #80 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia Age: 35
Posts: 239
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? Uh...not just because i say so. Its because both have recouped from injuries, and now we have Salvae subbing out with Golston who will have a better year now that he's progressing into his second. U act as if im saying that our line is great or something. I believe the acquistion of CJ would be worth running with the same line as last year. I do Believe we will be better against the run with minor improvements in the linebacking corps and secondary. With your response I'd love nothing better than to say your wrong, yet i know that our tackles are a year older and Daniels has been fairly unproductive. The idea of CJ and Jason Campbell makes me willing to run with them another year...therefore is suggest to trade up |
| | |
| | #81 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Newport News,Virginia Age: 48
Posts: 4,495
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? Anybody's guess..... we'll know in two weeks and two days for sure. I still hope we find a partner and trade down. More Picks
__________________ "There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
| | |
| | #82 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 227
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? we dont need calvin johnson,that would cost us to much.we dont have a decent pass rusher on the right side to go with carter.we should get charles johnson. |
| | |
| | #83 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? Quote:
Golston will improve for sure, although he hasn't shown much to begin with.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #84 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? I do not know much about Charles Johnson' career at Georgia, but I do know his draft stock has been falling. Do you know why, because that could be an important thing to know before we draft him?
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| | |
| | #85 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia Age: 35
Posts: 239
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? At first we all wanted Allan Branch, then we wanted Gaines Adams, ESPN releases their aritcle on Okoye now we should draft him 6th? Has he actually replaced Gaines as the can't miss prospect? I don't know, seems as the national consensus is that Calvin Johnson is the truth. I don't want to defend not bolstering the line because we are sorely in need of help but no of us really no exactly how much it would cost to move up to 2 or 3. So wide reciever is not a pressing need, ok, but i don't want to walk away from the next Marvin Harrison with Randy Moss/Terrell Owens ability for a Tommie Harris. I should end by saying if the acquistion became to costly, ie. trading away a intergal part of the team then we should stand pat or trade back to bolster the D. |
| | |
| | #86 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 8,317
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? There's a split between DE-advocates and DT-advocates, but a lot of people have liked Okoye for a long time now. And, while DTs are nowhere near as "sexy" as WRs, they're just as important. I'd prefer to upgrade our 31st ranked defense before adding to an offense that has Cooley, Moss, Portis, Betts, ARE, Lloyd, etc. If Campbell develops like people expect him to, we don't need another #1 WR. Finally, I don't like the idea of bumping Moss to #2. |
| | |
| | #87 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? Quote:
But regardless of where our offensive problems lie, the use of the 6th pick on the DL is just common sense.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #88 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Newport News,Virginia Age: 48
Posts: 4,495
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? Quote:
However, I've also said if we stay at #6 Gaines Adams has a heck of an upside and ALL the tools to get it done. IMO if we stay at #6 he's the guy. I think DE would be my #1 choice, followed closely by a DT which would be my second choice.
__________________ "There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! | |
| | |
| | #89 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 8,317
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? For better or for worse, the front office is reportedly uninterested in Adams. |
| | |
| | #90 | |
| Contains football related knowledge Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Second Star On The Right Age: 50
Posts: 7,146
| Re: Skins stuck at No. 6? Quote:
Around the time of the combine, I remember reading somewhere that Gibbs and Williams appeared to really like Okoye (and yes, I have been an Okoye backer from well before the ESPN article).
__________________ My Little Pony: Friendship is magic? or ... a repressive matriarchal society where individuals' roles are defined by their immutable physical characteristics and governance is reserved for those who demonstrate the genetic purity of the pony master race? | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |