Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


Interesting mock draft

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-16-2007, 12:44 AM   #31
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 26
Posts: 8,606
Re: Interesting mock draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C View Post
yo
How does Tech feel?

And why are you hiding your little green light indicator? I am not stalking you, I promise.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-16-2007, 12:49 AM   #32
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 35
Posts: 5,829
Re: Interesting mock draft

We are going to have to pick at number 6 how about that. No one will trade with us, and we will have no more first day picks. I hope that there are a bunch of diamonds in the 2nd day rough.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 01:04 AM   #33
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Age: 27
Posts: 4,439
Re: Interesting mock draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
How does Tech feel?

And why are you hiding your little green light indicator? I am not stalking you, I promise.
feels cold and windy

yeah im hiding it

wutup
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 01:11 AM   #34
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 26
Posts: 8,606
Re: Interesting mock draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C View Post
feels cold and windy

yeah im hiding it

wutup
a real O.G.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 01:19 AM   #35
Special Teams
 
BeastsoftheNFCeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
Re: Interesting mock draft

I think that its a common misconception that the pats are way out of character this season. They have a ton of draft picks to build for the future, which is what they do. They didnt give any picks away. The signings that they made were not all as big as youd think, with the amount of space that the pats had under the cap, they could have spent alot more, and the signing bonuses on a number of the "large contracts" were tiny. I think Stallworth got a 3 mil bonus to a 30mil contract or something like that. They actually didnt spend as much money as you would think.
BeastsoftheNFCeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 01:21 AM   #36
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Age: 27
Posts: 4,439
Re: Interesting mock draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
a real O.G.
what is o.g.?
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 01:27 AM   #37
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 26
Posts: 8,606
Re: Interesting mock draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C View Post
what is o.g.?
Original Gangster son...

you gotta urbdic that junx.

Urban Dictionary: Define Your World

it is a dictionary for slang, check it out and search OG.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 04:31 AM   #38
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 4,261
Re: Interesting mock draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by offiss View Post
Stupid for who we would take at those spots.

Everyone thinks all you have to do is draft a player at a position of need and you have filled that need, not so! Take a look at last off season, and we still have a need for a pass rusher, and a safety, why?

Draft the best available player, we have so many holes to fill because of our stupidity, it would be just like us to trade down get 2 players who are average at best, and the Pats walk away with a perenial pro-bowler. The question must be asked, if the Pats are indeed willing to make this trade, why? Why not keep the picks and draft these players themselves? The one team that has proven to may be the best team in the NFL at spotting talent, is willing to give up 2 #1 picks to draft Landry, why?
So with a defensive line that needs a run stuffer and a pass rusher, why would it be stupid to take two first round talents to fill them as opposed to betting the ranch that one guy is going to make a difference?

How do you know that the Pats are going to pick Landry?

Since offensive and defensive success is predicated on line play, you can't honestly think the Redskins defense would be better off taking a rookie safety over two defensive linemen. If you do, you need one of Al Koken's virtual physicals.

Why do the Eagles only draft linemen with their first round picks year in and year out? Because it makes sense.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 04:47 AM   #39
The Starter
 
RedskinPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Camino,Ca
Posts: 1,174
Re: Interesting mock draft

I just don't see this draft going that way. First C.Johnson just might be the Raiders first pick. If that happens look for Russell to go to the Lions. Then who knows what happens. Sitting three the Browns could take a QB or RB in Quinn or Peterson. If it is Peterson then look for the Buc's to move down with a trade with Miami so the Dolphins get thier QB. But if the the Browns take Quinn and who could blame them with Frye and Anderson as your QB the Buc's would be left holding the bag! I really don't know what the Browns will do! But what ever they do it will have us all watching because then teams will wanted to move up to get Quinn like Miami [if they Fins don't pick up Green before the draft]. That is if the Browns go with Peterson. If they[Browns] go Quinn then Peterson is left there TB may trade out to a team like the Vikings maybe? TB may just go with G.Adams DE for that matter. What ever happens if Al Davis throws everthing out the window and gets Johnson it could be very fun first few hours on saturday.
RedskinPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 10:38 AM   #40
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 40
Posts: 5,293
Re: Interesting mock draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by offiss View Post
Everyone thinks all you have to do is draft a player at a position of need and you have filled that need, not so! Take a look at last off season, and we still have a need for a pass rusher, and a safety, why?
The Lions didn't NEED all those wide receivers, but their philosophy was to take the best players available. How'd that work out?

We have gaping holes with the pass rush and run stoppers up front. You think we should just ignore that and draft Adrian Peterson?
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 10:48 AM   #41
Playmaker
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 4,557
Re: Interesting mock draft

I would like this trade if we are sure we can get some guys that we like on our draft board. I personally am a big fan of Ben Grubbs the OG from Auburn. He wouls be an upgrade over Doc. I'm sure of it. That guy has a high motor and put 225 40 times at the combine. He would be a steal at 28.

Now at 21 I like Justin Harrell but there also could be a DE there to. I have been saying I would like this trade to go down since we brought up trying to trade for Samuel ( who we don't need at this point). Now the question is how do you make up the 200 or 300 draft value points, and to be honest I don;t have an answer because I don't see the Pats coming off more picks unless they really think Landry is the missing piece or really put alot of value on finding Harrison's replacement.
__________________
Robert Griffin III welcome to the Washington Redskins!

Year 1 - NFC EAST Champions at 10-6

Year 2 - 3-10... Benched 14 weeks to late.....

Year 3 - Pure Awesomeness!!

http://site.fandangoracinginc.com/
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 12:26 PM   #42
The Starter
 
SC Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
Re: Interesting mock draft

You know to actually make this trade work as far as the 'Draft Value Chart' the Pats would have to include both of their #1's (24 and 28) (740pts and 660pts) as well as their #3 (91) (136pts) AND their #4 (127) (45pts). Which would bring them to 1581, which would still if you want to get really technical leave them 19 pts short of the #6 value of 1600 ... which they could make up by including their compensatory pick in the 5th round (171) (23pts).

So ...

To actual satisfy the value as dictated by the draft value chart the Pats would have to give the Skins their two firsts, their third, fourth, and fifth round picks. Which would leave the Pats with less draft picks than the Skins currently hold (the Pats have no #2). Obviously the value chart is a guide, but if it shows you how valuable the #6 pick is and how jealously the Skins ought to guard it if they really want to get proper value in return.

I don't, however, forsee Roger Goodell saying ...

"We have a trade ... the Patriots move to #6, in return the Redskins receive picks #24, #28, #91, #127, and #171." I guess you could talk about picks in future years, but man this would be a complicated trade.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
SC Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 12:54 PM   #43
Playmaker
 
mlmpetert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,257
Re: Interesting mock draft

That would be awsome if that happend. Lions fans have to be even more hyped.
mlmpetert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 05:16 PM   #44
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 40
Posts: 5,293
Re: Interesting mock draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by offiss View Post
Did they take the best player available? OBVIOUSLY NOT!

They took big Mike Williams funny right before that draft we were conteplating taking him and I said he could be a huge bust he was to slow of foot getting off the line, funny they couldn't see it? So the fact is they have the right philosophy but have no idea how to impliment it because of thier inability to evaluate talent.

Why would we draft Peterson? Portis is better right?

But we should draft CJ if he's available, even though we are stocked at WR from last season's spending binge. CJ is a can't miss barring injury!

How did our pick of Rocky work out last draft? Apparently we still need a LB. And that's what this is about if you can't fill that need with a bonified stud [pro-bowler] at the 6 spot then fill another need!

I don't mind trading down, but we better trade down for the right players!
We don't know about Rocky yet, but in my opinion, it doesn't look promising. But your criticism of that pick can be used with the Mike Williams example - you have to separate the philosophy of drafting for need from player evaluation.

A team can ignore their needs, draft what they perceive to be the best player available and still whiff on a player because their evaluation was wrong.

But what you clearly can't do is draft the best player available regardless of the makeup of your current roster San Diego wouldn't draft a running back, Indy wouldn't make a huge swing for a quarterback, and neither would we when we have to consider the development of Jason Campbell, salary cap constraints, and the obvious understanding that there is only one ball to go around on every single play.

If your team is completely stocked, and you have no glaring needs at any one position, I could fully understand drafting the best guy on the board when you pick.

We have zero pass rush, and we could not stop the run last year. It would be madness for us to take Brady Quinn or Adrian Peterson because Quinn would never see the field, and Peterson would never see the ball.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 06:25 PM   #45
Special Teams
 
TenandSix:Unacceptable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 289
Re: Interesting mock draft

Greg Williams is on his way back from the Landry workout and is going to put an end to all this Tom Foolery. We'll be taking my man LL with #6. Just get used to the idea cuz that's how this thing is going down. LL and ST laying the smack-down on opposing teams game plans for the next decade or so.
TenandSix:Unacceptable is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.29443 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25