Warpath Mock Draft (Order Set-Post #31)

Slingin Sammy 33

If we do, I'm in, I don't care what team (as long as it isn't the Cowgirls).

__________________
...[If] an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything]....you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.

Dirtbag59

I'll be whoevers up when this thread gets going.

__________________
Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President

That Guy

two of us organized it last year, and while everyone was eager to sign up, a lot decided not to show up when it actually happened (weeks of notice to figure out if they could be online) and very few actually took time to do any research even with all the information provided, compiled, and linked in the thread.

i'm down, but unless it's people that actually spend time studying the draft, it's really not going to be even 50% accurate.

__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!

jdlea

Is the idea supposed to be to project what will happen, or is it to suggest what we would do in that team's situation?

__________________

GTripp0012

Back in 2006, it was about a projection of what would happen.

The truth is though, we don't know what teams are thinking at this point, so those are pretty much one in the same concept at this point.

I don't know what Matty, SGG, and Smootsmack will think about this, but perhaps it would run most efficiently if we restricted it to VIP members only. Wouldn't be a bad way to create more VIP members.

__________________
Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.”

GTripp0012

As long as people don't use the mock as a fourm to drum up publicity for a player who they like/know personally, it should run OK.

__________________
Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.”

EARTHQUAKE2689

yeah VIP only

__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.

GTripp0012

We'll need the OK from Matty for that though.

I'm for anything that will make it happen quicker, and more efficiently.

Either way, this would be a mid March sort of deal, we want to wait for the big FA money to dry up and see who fills what need in FA.

__________________
Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.”

SmootSmack

Don't forget Brud, TMC, Summo, Canuck, and Gmanc too.

__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

GTripp0012

Let me know what the Council of Elders decides

__________________
Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.”

jdlea

Sounds good, I didn't participate last year, but I'm a lot more into college football this year and would like to participate. I have some good ideas with what to do with the Falcons and I know what the Saints SHOULD be doing...can't guarantee they'll do it.

__________________

prinzeofmoval

VIP only? wow i feel like the fat kid who didnt get picked for the kickball game...how does one become v.i.p.

__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn.

FRPLG

I think we should put some serious thought into how to reorganize this. It was a total dud last year and I am pretty sure it will turn the same this year. I am not sure I have any ideas but let's try and think about some out of the box ideas on how to make this interesting and more importantly up participation.

Part of me wonders if we should restrict it to something 5 or 6 members who form a team and consult and then we roll out a couple picks a day and then let the rest of the board debate it. It might be time consuming for the 5 or 6 but it would be better researched and more "accurate"