Where Do We LEAST Need To Improve?

FRPLG · 03-17-2008, 04:38 PM

Well I said WR but I have reconsidered and think OT is right. Outside of a franchise tackle we'll probably not get anyone better than Jansen and certainly not any better than Samuels so a OT is going to be a depth/long term pick. Outside of injury I don't a OT playing for us this year whereas all of the other positions have a decent/good shot at starting straight away.

Stuck in TX · 03-17-2008, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big C

DT. we have griff, montgomery and golston. OT we have samuels and jansen who is coming off a pretty bad injury for the 2nd season out of 3 thats why i disagree with the majority here

there was alot of trashing going on last season about how we didnt draft a DT and you know, you are right, we really do have a solid DT corps. Its a tie between that and OT. we are getting kind of old on the O line though. We need to start looking towards the future.

SeanTaylor21 · 03-17-2008, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuck in TX

there was alot of trashing going on last season about how we didnt draft a DT and you know, you are right, we really do have a solid DT corps. Its a tie between that and OT. we are getting kind of old on the O line though. We need to start looking towards the future.

We really only need 1 OT, because of Stephon Heyer, and if Lorenzo Alexander can play T maybe we should see how he plays.

EternalEnigma21 · 03-17-2008, 07:08 PM

I think we're good at tackle and guard... I said guard in the poll, thinking of kendall and thomas, but beyond them depth may be an issue moreso at guard than at tackle, when I think about Jansen, Samuels, Wade, Fabini, and Heyer. we need a starting quality corner, as shawn is no "spring" chicken, and smoot and rogers are just solid twos. we need a dynamic wideout, as we've been suffering there for a couple of years. D line has been a soft spot on our D for a while. Griff was a monster his first year, but steadily declined and hasn't had much support. Carter has been great, but daniels is avg.

SeanTaylor21 · 03-17-2008, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by canthetuna

I think we're good at tackle and guard... I said guard in the poll, thinking of kendall and thomas, but beyond them depth may be an issue moreso at guard than at tackle, when I think about Jansen, Samuels, Wade, Fabini, and Heyer. we need a starting quality corner, as shawn is no "spring" chicken, and smoot and rogers are just solid twos. we need a dynamic wideout, as we've been suffering there for a couple of years. D line has been a soft spot on our D for a while. Griff was a monster his first year, but steadily declined and hasn't had much support. Carter has been great, but daniels is avg.

I was thinking, if Chris Wilson can bulk up a bit, and then he could become the starting DE, we could move Phillip Daniels to DT, like he was on 3rd downs, and he could provide a nice pass rush from there as he did throughout last year, well he provided a better pass rush from DT than he was DE.

SmootSmack · 03-17-2008, 08:30 PM

Long shot, but I'd love to see Alex Buzbee emerge this year.

Stuck in TX · 03-17-2008, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Long shot, but I'd love to see Alex Buzbee emerge this year.

crazy I was thinking the same thing last week.

SmootSmack · 03-17-2008, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuck in TX

crazy I was thinking the same thing last week.

Damn straight, we're starting the Buzbee Bandwagon!

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 03-17-2008, 08:58 PM

Samuels and Jansen are pretty good. In that sense, we don't need to improve our position at OT. Nonetheless, I think we really need to start adding quality youth to the O-line. Fielding 5 starting O-lineman over the age of 30 in 2008 is a recipe for serious problems in 2009 and beyond.

Moreover, I think we need to upgrade our depth along the O-line. As evidenced by our woes the past few seasons, depth along the O-line is essential.

GMScud · 03-18-2008, 12:11 AM

Just got back from the Wiz game. Arrrgggghhhhhhh.
Anyway, since this thread didn't specify a time frame, for this season, I'll say we LEAST need to improve at tackle. If Jansen is healthy and Heyer is still around, and Samuels turns in another pro bowl year, clearly tackle is the strongest of the listed positions.

SmootSmack · 03-18-2008, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMScud

Just got back from the Wiz game. Arrrgggghhhhhhh.
Anyway, since this thread didn't specify a time frame, for this season, I'll say we LEAST need to improve at tackle. If Jansen is healthy and Heyer is still around, and Samuels turns in another pro bowl year, clearly tackle is the strongest of the listed positions.

http://www.redskinswarpath.com/432577-post1.html

"So with that in mind, where can we afford to go with the status quo for another year?"

Stuck in TX · 03-18-2008, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

http://www.redskinswarpath.com/432577-post1.html

"So with that in mind, where can we afford to go with the status quo for another year?"

DT... we have a solid group of guys who are mostly pretty young and will be dominant.

GMScud · 03-18-2008, 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

http://www.redskinswarpath.com/432577-post1.html

"So with that in mind, where can we afford to go with the status quo for another year?"

So for 2008 I'll say DT and OT are a tie. Montgomery/Golston/Griffin will be the defensive equivalent of Jansen and Samuels with Heyer filling in. Sorry I missed your specifics. It slightly changes my answer, but not by much. OT and DT are neck and neck IMO. Or at least very close to it.

That Guy · 03-18-2008, 01:46 AM

here they are:

http://www.redskinswarpath.com/locke...extensive.html
http://www.redskinswarpath.com/locke...extensive.html

http://www.redskinswarpath.com/locke...extensive.html

rypper11 · 03-19-2008, 11:01 AM

If Jansen is healthy, we have a really great pair of tackles with solid depth. Maybe get some undrafted FA's there for camp bodies but really we are set at Tackle.
I'd like to see more LB depth picked up on Day 2.

View Poll Results: Where Do We LEAST Need To Improve?
CB	22	14.67%
DE	7	4.67%
DT	31	20.67%
OG	16	10.67%
OT	54	36.00%
WR	20	13.33%
Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll

03-17-2008, 04:38 PM	#16
FRPLG Franchise Player Join Date: May 2004 Age: 34 Posts: 9,232	Re: Where Do We LEAST Need To Improve? Well I said WR but I have reconsidered and think OT is right. Outside of a franchise tackle we'll probably not get anyone better than Jansen and certainly not any better than Samuels so a OT is going to be a depth/long term pick. Outside of injury I don't a OT playing for us this year whereas all of the other positions have a decent/good shot at starting straight away.

03-17-2008, 07:08 PM	#19
EternalEnigma21 Assistant Regional Mod Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Warrenton VA Age: 33 Posts: 2,953	Re: Where Do We LEAST Need To Improve? I think we're good at tackle and guard... I said guard in the poll, thinking of kendall and thomas, but beyond them depth may be an issue moreso at guard than at tackle, when I think about Jansen, Samuels, Wade, Fabini, and Heyer. we need a starting quality corner, as shawn is no "spring" chicken, and smoot and rogers are just solid twos. we need a dynamic wideout, as we've been suffering there for a couple of years. D line has been a soft spot on our D for a while. Griff was a monster his first year, but steadily declined and hasn't had much support. Carter has been great, but daniels is avg. __________________ Need electrical work in the Northern VA, or Shenandoah Valley? Click here ...and why do we still have a Tom Tupa avatar???

03-17-2008, 08:30 PM	#21
SmootSmack Mad Men Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 43,097	Re: Where Do We LEAST Need To Improve? Long shot, but I'd love to see Alex Buzbee emerge this year. __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

03-17-2008, 08:58 PM	#24
Sheriff Gonna Getcha Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 34 Posts: 8,317	Re: Where Do We LEAST Need To Improve? Samuels and Jansen are pretty good. In that sense, we don't need to improve our position at OT. Nonetheless, I think we really need to start adding quality youth to the O-line. Fielding 5 starting O-lineman over the age of 30 in 2008 is a recipe for serious problems in 2009 and beyond. Moreover, I think we need to upgrade our depth along the O-line. As evidenced by our woes the past few seasons, depth along the O-line is essential.

03-18-2008, 12:11 AM	#25
GMScud Swearinger Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Age: 34 Posts: 12,623	Re: Where Do We LEAST Need To Improve? Just got back from the Wiz game. Arrrgggghhhhhhh. Anyway, since this thread didn't specify a time frame, for this season, I'll say we LEAST need to improve at tackle. If Jansen is healthy and Heyer is still around, and Samuels turns in another pro bowl year, clearly tackle is the strongest of the listed positions. __________________ Insert witty signature here

03-18-2008, 01:46 AM	#29
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Springfield, VA Age: 30 Posts: 15,617	Re: Where Do We LEAST Need To Improve? here they are: http://www.redskinswarpath.com/locke...extensive.html http://www.redskinswarpath.com/locke...extensive.html http://www.redskinswarpath.com/locke...extensive.html __________________ Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!

03-19-2008, 11:01 AM	#30
rypper11 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Winston Salem, NC Posts: 1,217	Re: Where Do We LEAST Need To Improve? If Jansen is healthy, we have a really great pair of tackles with solid depth. Maybe get some undrafted FA's there for camp bodies but really we are set at Tackle. I'd like to see more LB depth picked up on Day 2. __________________ Playing a kids game for a kings ransom.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Where Do We LEAST Need To Improve?

NFL Draft Central