![]() |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: WTF Pick of Day One | |||
| WR Devin Thomas (34) | | 18 | 12.00% |
| TE Fred Davis (48) | | 95 | 63.33% |
| WR Malcolm Kelly (51) | | 37 | 24.67% |
| Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #781 | |
| Pro Bowl ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,020
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread Quote:
Seriously though, we don't have a backup guard to my knowledge unless you think Alexander is coming through (you better not mention Fabini or I will find you). And w/ Kendell's arthritic knees and RTs struggle to stay healthy... at the very least we need a very high quality guard (if not starting caliber). I guess I can give Heyer the benefit of the doubt for when JJ goes down, but at least give me a a guard. Damn it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you. | |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #782 |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: 31 Spooner St. Age: 38
Posts: 9,534
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread I would love to see ARE traded for someone of value. I like the man, but as a WR he lacks what we need. He's too much money too.
__________________ Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
| | |
| | #783 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Hagerstown, MD Age: 31
Posts: 231
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread I'm just saying, I never saw what happened today coming. So who knows whats next. I guess trading ARE would take a large hit on the cap. |
| | |
| | #784 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Camino,Ca
Posts: 1,174
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #785 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,202
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread Quote:
As 12th said, he should be overjoyed to come to Washington and have an opportunity to play with Campbell, Portis, Cooley & our OL (healthy) and have a chance to start immediately for an offense-minded head coach. I'm not thrilled with Kelly, but I haven't watched hours of film on him either. We could've taken Sweed, so hopefully the coaches and FO did their homework on him. But I don't think an argument can be made that he wasn't a value at # 51.
__________________ ...[If] an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything]....you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. | |
| | |
| | #786 | |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread Quote:
The lineman that went high today's draft figure to start for those teams. We don't have starter need, but we do have depth need. And for the most part, I feel as though our depth is solid. Could be better, but it aint the worse in the league either. | |
| | |
| | #787 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,202
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread Quote:
__________________ ...[If] an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything]....you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. | |
| | |
| | #788 |
| Pro Bowl ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,020
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread I'm not really surprised we didn't take a DE today. I know all the boards had us taking one and it was the conventional wisdom, but I heard Blache say at least a few times he wanted a stud DT to create havoc in the middle. That's why I thought we'd take a DT (was hoping for Balmer) and two, yes two, o-lineman. So I was wrong by how much...
__________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you. |
| | |
| | #789 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Detroit area
Posts: 3,961
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread Thrash is probably indeed toast as well as any WR that isn't Moss or Randle El, unless the latter two will be trade bait. Strange pick for a new TE. Guy is a beast, but we do need a S and a young CB real bad, so why "waste" a pick on a non necessity? Zorn must not like our depth a TE at all. Overall I am OK with today's events though. IF Cooley goes down we have a beast of a backup or even someone that can give Cooley some real competition. Moss is getting old and gets banged up too easy anymore. Still pissed at that fumble of his that cost us the Packers game and his nonchalant attitude about his crappy play that followed. |
| | |
| | #790 | |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread Quote:
I would say unload him for a defender of equal value; any position mind you. | |
| | |
| | #791 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Fayetteville, NC Age: 28
Posts: 896
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread Maybe its just me, and maybe this is usually the case, but does anyone else find it odd that Zorn wasn't even at the draft? He also sounded surprised with some of his comments that we got the players we got... |
| | |
| | #792 | |
| Pro Bowl ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,020
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread Quote:
Most running plays went something like this... "Portis/Betts line up in the backfield and take the hand-off to the left but oh, looks like they we're caught from behind or stopped at the LOS when the right side collapsed for Washington." And then Fabini would rub his belly hair and shake his head while looking up at the bleachers. I think I saw Fabini at a truck stop earlier this year even, I'm sure it's his job in the off-season.
__________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you. | |
| | |
| | #793 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Detroit area
Posts: 3,961
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread Quote:
WE get 3 picks 7th round, but come on, how many 7th rounders actually make the team other than practice squad? Last years late rounders are no longer Skins anymore, think it will be any different this year? In my mind we really only have one pick tomorrow in the 4th round and the rest will be cut or just practice squad fodder. We might fulfill our G needs with late picks, but nothing more. The duo WR picks and the surprising TE pickup might be an indication, as others here have speculated of some impending cuts and/or trades with some vets on the squad to deal with our needs. | |
| | |
| | #794 |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread Honestly, this guy is behind the scense drawing up and Xs and Os and still getting adjusted to his new gig. I think after this year, he'll be more active with the draft and that sort of thing. For all intent and purposes, he's a rookie Head Coach. |
| | |
| | #795 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Camino,Ca
Posts: 1,174
| Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |