Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


Rams to select Chris Long with No. 2 pick

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-26-2008, 02:22 PM   #16
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,636
Re: Rams to select Chris Long with No. 2 pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanTaylor21 View Post
...., terrible move in my mind, they already have Michael Bush, Justin Fargas, Dominic Rhodes, and Lamont Jordan, and now they add another RB, retards....
Rhodes probably doesn't have much left. Bush is coming off a major injury. LJ is likely gone (possible June 1 cut?)
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-26-2008, 03:49 PM   #17
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 32
Posts: 5,413
Re: Rams to select Chris Long with No. 2 pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Rhodes probably doesn't have much left. Bush is coming off a major injury. LJ is likely gone (possible June 1 cut?)
Id have to agree that McFadden is a bad pick for them. Im not very high on him in general, but the Raiders have other needs. And running backs will be around later, plus the other LJ, Larry Johnson may be cut next year. Shaun alexnder is a free agent. And they had some great games from their running game last year.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 06:00 PM   #18
Special Teams
 
SeanTaylor21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Age: 21
Posts: 445
Re: Rams to select Chris Long with No. 2 pick

ESPN - Rhodes is odd man out after Raiders draft McFadden - NFL

Didn't think that he was gonna get cut, probably get picked up soon though.
__________________
“The unexamined life is not worth living.” Socrates

http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/6...rmationgg7.jpg

http://www.thehogs.net/sean-taylor/burgundy_heart.jpg
SeanTaylor21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 02:10 PM   #19
The Starter
 
Riggo44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Clemente CA
Age: 40
Posts: 2,389
Re: Rams to select Chris Long with No. 2 pick

The Rams are lucky. I think they got the best player in the draft. I would have loved for the Skins to get Chris Long.

I would also agree that the Raiders are retards. They have so many other needs. But no they wanted to go with the sexy pick to sell jersey's or something.
__________________
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
Benjamin Franklin
Riggo44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 02:12 PM   #20
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 25
Posts: 11,943
Re: Rams to select Chris Long with No. 2 pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riggo44 View Post
The Rams are lucky. I think they got the best player in the draft. I would have loved for the Skins to get Chris Long.

I would also agree that the Raiders are retards. They have so many other needs. But no they wanted to go with the sexy pick to sell jersey's or something.

You could say the same thing about the Vikings last year
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 02:37 PM   #21
The Starter
 
Riggo44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Clemente CA
Age: 40
Posts: 2,389
Re: Rams to select Chris Long with No. 2 pick

The Vikings got extremely lucky with the out put from Peterson. Not to mention the Vikings have a pretty good O-Line where as the Raiders line SUCKS! I don't think you can expect any rookie RB to put up numbers like that anytime soon.
__________________
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
Benjamin Franklin
Riggo44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 06:51 PM   #22
Special Teams
 
SeanTaylor21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Age: 21
Posts: 445
Re: Rams to select Chris Long with No. 2 pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riggo44 View Post
The Vikings got extremely lucky with the out put from Peterson. Not to mention the Vikings have a pretty good O-Line where as the Raiders line SUCKS! I don't think you can expect any rookie RB to put up numbers like that anytime soon.
They also had one of the greatest blocking backs in the league, Tony Richardson.
__________________
“The unexamined life is not worth living.” Socrates

http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/6...rmationgg7.jpg

http://www.thehogs.net/sean-taylor/burgundy_heart.jpg
SeanTaylor21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 07:20 PM   #23
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,522
Re: Rams to select Chris Long with No. 2 pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Rhodes probably doesn't have much left.
I disagree on Rhodes. I think he has two or three DUI's left before they never let him drive again.
__________________
6.67×10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.18590 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25