Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


Mock Database Update (1/30)

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2009, 01:20 PM   #1
Impact Rookie
 
PennSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Mock Database Update (1/30)

Ok, we not have 165 mocks drafts for 2009 and we have had a total of 139 updated in January and a good chunk of them have been update over the last 7 days.

We added a new feature as well, we now provide at the top of the main table the tabulated consensus picks for the first 5 picks and the Redskins pick. These tabulations are based on all mock drafts updated in the last 10 days.

The Redskins pick at 13 is obviously all over the board, though position wise, DE and OT rule, while some are projecting LB and CB.

Right now:

DE Everette Brown leads with 19 mocks but only trailed by OT Michael Oher by 1, at 18 mocks. Right behind those two is OT Jason Smith with 14 mocks projecting him at #13.

http://dcprosportsreport.com/MockDraft.htm
__________________
DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net

PennSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-30-2009, 01:34 PM   #2
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

What I want to know is why 59% of the people have us taking a QB Matt Stafford with our first pick? or am I missing something. Do we really need a QB? huh, wait, umm don't answer that. We have glaring needs elsewhere and I have noticed some drafts out there have us taking this kid.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 01:37 PM   #3
The Starter
 
NM Redskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,009
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
What I want to know is why 59% of the people have us taking a QB Matt Stafford with our first pick? or am I missing something. Do we really need a QB? huh, wait, umm don't answer that. We have glaring needs elsewhere and I have noticed some drafts out there have us taking this kid.
that's for the first overall pick ,not the redskins pick. look at the far right for that.
__________________
Despite my solid 40 time and great intangibles I went undrafted AGAIN!
NM Redskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 01:38 PM   #4
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

I'm sorry I guess I'm reading it wrong. Its who they think will be picked in the first 1-5 picks then they show who they think the Skins will pick. Sorry for taking up space. lol.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 01:43 PM   #5
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,109
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
What I want to know is why 59% of the people have us taking a QB Matt Stafford with our first pick? or am I missing something. Do we really need a QB? huh, wait, umm don't answer that. We have glaring needs elsewhere and I have noticed some drafts out there have us taking this kid.
The Redskins pick is highlighted in Burgundy (or as Zorn would call it...Maroon). Don't feel bad though, I did the same thing when I saw the database. LOL.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 01:45 PM   #6
The Starter
 
NM Redskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,009
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
I'm sorry I guess I'm reading it wrong. Its who they think will be picked in the first 1-5 picks then they show who they think the Skins will pick. Sorry for taking up space. lol.
No problem, it helps my post count. the first time i did the same.
__________________
Despite my solid 40 time and great intangibles I went undrafted AGAIN!
NM Redskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 01:46 PM   #7
Playmaker
 
Trample the Elderly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 36
Posts: 2,906
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

I'll take Oher, Smith, or Brown.
Trample the Elderly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 03:23 PM   #8
Special Teams
 
ChickenMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ontario,Ca
Age: 41
Posts: 274
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Personally with only 4 picks Id rather pass on all 3

Trade down and take Max Unger..He can play OT/C

Add Free Agent OT..Kalif Barnes,or Vernon Carey, Max Starks all could play RT
ChickenMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 03:24 PM   #9
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Oher is not worth the #13 pick. Maybe if we trade down & he's there in the late 20s or early 2nd. His stock is falling, and based on the only game I watched (bowl game), I can see why.

I have a really good impression of Brown, but DEs are higher risk.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 03:56 PM   #10
Camp Scrub
 
Whiteboi_J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas/Ft Worth, Tx
Age: 29
Posts: 46
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
Oher is not worth the #13 pick. Maybe if we trade down & he's there in the late 20s or early 2nd. His stock is falling, and based on the only game I watched (bowl game), I can see why.

I have a really good impression of Brown, but DEs are higher risk.
u are right in that DEs are a higher risk to bust in the 1st round, or not make an immediate impact (see mario williams).

Some of those people doing Mocks are on crack....Is Monroe really gonna fall all the way to 13? lol. And it's starting to look like Smith might not make it that far neither, with most the top 10 teams in need of an OT. Brown only makes sense if Taylor can stand up and play LOLB to replace washington
Whiteboi_J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 04:09 PM   #11
Registered User
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

The mocks that have us taking a DE are a little puzzling... actually really puzzling. Basically we're bringing back two starters from last year (i would count Evans as a starter now even though i'd like to upgrade him) while the oline has these glaring holes.
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 06:01 PM   #12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
The mocks that have us taking a DE are a little puzzling... actually really puzzling. Basically we're bringing back two starters from last year (i would count Evans as a starter now even though i'd like to upgrade him) while the oline has these glaring holes.
DE & DT are pretty significant needs. We need a pass rush any way we can get it. I don't think it's puzzling at all. If they really like a DE that's there at 13 it makes sense to grab him.

I do agree that the o line is more in need, especially RT. I think the smart pick is an OT w/13 but if they feel the class is deep enough to get somebody decent in rnd. 3 maybe they take Brown or Orakpo if they can.
If Oher is the last of the top OTs left at 13 I hope we can trade down or take somebody they've rated higher on the d line.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 06:20 PM   #13
Impact Rookie
 
Son Of Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 643
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

I agree with passing on Oher. I've watched the senior bowl on DVR twice and he doesn't appear to be that good. Also, the knock on him is effort, especially in run blocking! Pass on him please!!! (pass on Peria Jerry and BJ Raji too). One week of senior bowl practice does not do enough for a college career of hacking it.

If no trade take Maualuga at 13.

If we can trade down take Eben Britton or Fili Moala in the late first round and Ayers the DE in the third.

If
Son Of Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 06:36 PM   #14
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 36
Posts: 5,829
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
The mocks that have us taking a DE are a little puzzling... actually really puzzling. Basically we're bringing back two starters from last year (i would count Evans as a starter now even though i'd like to upgrade him) while the oline has these glaring holes.
I always wanted to tell you that you sig is effed up...yet funny in a sick sort of way. I feel bad for the boy and the reporter.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 06:52 PM   #15
Pro Bowl
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,392
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

PennSkinsFan. Do you know which mock was the closest to getting it right last year?
__________________
"Cautiously And Optimistically... Looking Forward To Change"
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.31089 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25