![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Aug 2005 Age: 42
Posts: 752
| Mock Database Update (1/30) Ok, we not have 165 mocks drafts for 2009 and we have had a total of 139 updated in January and a good chunk of them have been update over the last 7 days. We added a new feature as well, we now provide at the top of the main table the tabulated consensus picks for the first 5 picks and the Redskins pick. These tabulations are based on all mock drafts updated in the last 10 days. The Redskins pick at 13 is obviously all over the board, though position wise, DE and OT rule, while some are projecting LB and CB. Right now: DE Everette Brown leads with 19 mocks but only trailed by OT Michael Oher by 1, at 18 mocks. Right behind those two is OT Jason Smith with 14 mocks projecting him at #13. http://dcprosportsreport.com/MockDraft.htm
__________________ DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #2 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) What I want to know is why 59% of the people have us taking a QB Matt Stafford with our first pick? or am I missing something. Do we really need a QB? huh, wait, umm don't answer that. We have glaring needs elsewhere and I have noticed some drafts out there have us taking this kid. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,004
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) Quote:
__________________ Despite my solid 40 time and great intangibles I went undrafted AGAIN! | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) I'm sorry I guess I'm reading it wrong. Its who they think will be picked in the first 1-5 picks then they show who they think the Skins will pick. Sorry for taking up space. lol. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) Quote:
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,004
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) Quote:
the first time i did the same.
__________________ Despite my solid 40 time and great intangibles I went undrafted AGAIN! | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Three Chopt Virginia Age: 35
Posts: 2,906
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) I'll take Oher, Smith, or Brown. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Ontario,Ca Age: 39
Posts: 274
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) Personally with only 4 picks Id rather pass on all 3 Trade down and take Max Unger..He can play OT/C Add Free Agent OT..Kalif Barnes,or Vernon Carey, Max Starks all could play RT |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) Oher is not worth the #13 pick. Maybe if we trade down & he's there in the late 20s or early 2nd. His stock is falling, and based on the only game I watched (bowl game), I can see why. I have a really good impression of Brown, but DEs are higher risk. |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Dallas/Ft Worth, Tx Age: 27
Posts: 46
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) Quote:
Some of those people doing Mocks are on crack....Is Monroe really gonna fall all the way to 13? lol. And it's starting to look like Smith might not make it that far neither, with most the top 10 teams in need of an OT. Brown only makes sense if Taylor can stand up and play LOLB to replace washington | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Pro Bowl ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,021
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) The mocks that have us taking a DE are a little puzzling... actually really puzzling. Basically we're bringing back two starters from last year (i would count Evans as a starter now even though i'd like to upgrade him) while the oline has these glaring holes.
__________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you. |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) Quote:
I do agree that the o line is more in need, especially RT. I think the smart pick is an OT w/13 but if they feel the class is deep enough to get somebody decent in rnd. 3 maybe they take Brown or Orakpo if they can. If Oher is the last of the top OTs left at 13 I hope we can trade down or take somebody they've rated higher on the d line. | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 643
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) I agree with passing on Oher. I've watched the senior bowl on DVR twice and he doesn't appear to be that good. Also, the knock on him is effort, especially in run blocking! Pass on him please!!! (pass on Peria Jerry and BJ Raji too). One week of senior bowl practice does not do enough for a college career of hacking it. If no trade take Maualuga at 13. If we can trade down take Eben Britton or Fili Moala in the late first round and Ayers the DE in the third. If |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Pro Bowl ![]() Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: DC Metro Area Age: 34
Posts: 5,829
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) I always wanted to tell you that you sig is effed up...yet funny in a sick sort of way. I feel bad for the boy and the reporter.
__________________ Read "The Book", life will gain meaning. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,354
| Re: Mock Database Update (1/30) PennSkinsFan. Do you know which mock was the closest to getting it right last year?
__________________ "Cautiously And Optimistically... Looking Forward To Change" |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |