Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

LandrySlice · 12-20-2009, 07:08 PM

If we got Marshall, paried with Thomas, Moss, and the TE's, this offense would be so sweet, but you need o-line first so you have time to pass it to them. I am getting so excited about next year its crazy, but I feel this way every year! GOLLY!

vallin21 · 12-20-2009, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LandrySlice

If we got Marshall, paried with Thomas, Moss, and the TE's, this offense would be so sweet, but you need o-line first so you have time to pass it to them. I am getting so excited about next year its crazy, but I feel this way every year! GOLLY!

Yeah definetely agree with addressing the o-line first, but assuming Shanahan comes in, and if Marshall's available this is the perfect spot for him. An owner willing to shell out big contracts, and he's familar w/ Shanahans scheme. Marshall does have a "me first" but so did D-hall, but we need to shore up that O-line first.

RiggoDrill · 12-20-2009, 07:28 PM

I don't see the skins using a high draft pick on a RB if Shanny comes in as the coach. He has been very successful with late rounders and FA's in his plug-n-play running game.
A major rebuilding is in the works, and there are needs at every position, if not for starting talent then for depth.
I think Campbell stays for another year, maybe two.

GMScud · 12-20-2009, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LandrySlice

If we got Marshall, paried with Thomas, Moss, and the TE's, this offense would be so sweet, but you need o-line first so you have time to pass it to them. I am getting so excited about next year its crazy, but I feel this way every year! GOLLY!

I don't see Marshall leaving Denver. He's got great rapport with Orton, and Pat Bowlen already indicated Marshall has a big raise coming. They'll lock him up long term.

Zerohero · 12-20-2009, 08:30 PM

If we have a running back other than Portis next year starting we will already be ahead the game.

wolfeskins · 12-20-2009, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMScud

Starting over with a rookie QB in a complex system like the WCO is not the way to go.

was cutler a starter his rookie year for shanny? if so, how did he do?

CultBrennan59 · 12-20-2009, 09:21 PM

IF Mike Shanahan comes here, this is what I see happening.
-Our first pick will be a QB, because OLineman are rich in free agency especially guys who know shanahans system like mentioned before. I see us getting Sam Bradford.(If he's not available then I see us getting Okung from Oklahoma state, plus some other good OT's that are juniors are declaring this year so you know some will drop and we could get one with our second rounder)

-We make a play for Brandon Marshall for sure

-We bring in at least one offensive lineman (Logan Mankins, and Marcus McNeil are free agents)

-Portis is surprisingly kept because he knows Shanahans offense well and can teach Ganther and the RB we'll bring in through the draft (Betts is gone, possibly Cartwright)

-We also make a play for Keith Bulluck of the Titans, and Josh Cribbs for our poor return game

-Orakpo gets moved to DE, and Bob Slowik will probably be our DC after Blache retires

-Levi Jones is resigned and Rocky is signed to a long term deal. Dockery and Levi will most likely be the only guys from this current line who are on it next year. Rabach maybe gone, as well as heyer (or kept as a backup)

-Possible OL for next year Levi Jones, Dockery, Rabach?, Chris Kuper/Chester Pitts, Russell Okung
Jones, Dockery, Rabach?, Mike Iupati (rookie; Idaho), Tyson Clabo

-Antwaan Randel El, Randy Thomas, Chris Samuels, Philip Daniels, Cornelius Griffin, Fred Smoot, Todd Collins, and Justin Tryon gone. With Portis, Rabach, Moss, Cooley, Campbell?, Heyer, Fletcher?, Landry, Carter, Rogers all on the fence as to who stays/ goes/gets traded.

SBXVII · 12-20-2009, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zerohero

If we have a running back other than Portis next year starting we will already be ahead the game.

If we have a healthy RB next year we are ahead of the game.

Lotus · 12-20-2009, 09:24 PM

We will win the Super Bowl if we sign Pacman Jones.

dmek25 · 12-20-2009, 09:30 PM

no way Shanahan brings Marshall here. there were reports that he was ready to cut him, but he got fired instead. tired of his antics

mlmdub130 · 12-20-2009, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lotus

We will win the Super Bowl if we sign Pacman Jones.

i actually had a conversation about him with a friend, and i know it will probaly get shot down, but i thought it wouldn't have been that bad for us to bring him into camp, or atleast try, just pay him dirt and if he does anything wrong kick him out, i think he would have been a better option than anyone we have beside los smoot and hall

Ruhskins · 12-20-2009, 09:33 PM

Are people with all these theories taking into consideration how some free agents are going to be RFAs with the uncapped year? Just asking because many sites that have list of free agents don't have this information. I think Yahoo Sports has a list of UFAs and RFAs based on an uncapped year.

GMScud · 12-20-2009, 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wolfeskins

was cutler a starter his rookie year for shanny? if so, how did he do?

Cutler started 5 games his rookie year at the end of the season. He had 9 tds and 7 turnovers and had a rating of 82.5. Can't really take much from that.

Skins4L · 12-20-2009, 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMScud

I think we keep Jason Campbell and focus strongly on the O-line via the draft and FA. Ideally I'd like to move our #1 pick and stockpile more selections. I'm not opposed to taking a QB, but I'd like to do it in the 2nd or 3rd round (if we can get a 3rd by trading down) with a guy like Pike, Lefevour, or Zac Robinson. We're gonna need to address the RB position as well.

Starting over with a rookie QB in a complex system like the WCO is not the way to go. I would be fine with JC starting behind a re-tooled O-line, and Colt and a rookie with potential backing him up. We have a very solid, young defensive foundation. We're not going to need to score 30 points a game to win. Our offense will regress with a rookie QB starting, and if said rookie ends up as a bust, it could set us back years. We know we have a solid player in JC. He'll never be a top 5 QB (hell, only 5 men on earth are), but with a great D and better O-line, we can win with him.

Keeping JC will make this offense better in 2010. Build the O-line, and a RB, and let the 3 redshirt pass catchers continue to develop. Two TE sets with Cooley and Davis could be really nasty.

Tell em.

BigHairedAristocrat · 12-21-2009, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wilsowilso

This thread is unique.
That's all I got for the moment, but in the spirit of this thread I will post more thoughts as they come to me.

i agree with your theory on the uniqueness of the thread and will also post my thoughts

12-20-2009, 07:08 PM	#16
LandrySlice Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: AFGHANISTAN Posts: 334	Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins If we got Marshall, paried with Thomas, Moss, and the TE's, this offense would be so sweet, but you need o-line first so you have time to pass it to them. I am getting so excited about next year its crazy, but I feel this way every year! GOLLY! __________________ Don't tase me bro!!!!

12-20-2009, 07:28 PM	#18
RiggoDrill Camp Scrub Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Annandale, VA Posts: 57	Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins I don't see the skins using a high draft pick on a RB if Shanny comes in as the coach. He has been very successful with late rounders and FA's in his plug-n-play running game. A major rebuilding is in the works, and there are needs at every position, if not for starting talent then for depth. I think Campbell stays for another year, maybe two. __________________ "In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom, in water there is bacteria." - Benjamin Franklin

12-20-2009, 08:30 PM	#20
Zerohero Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: newport news, va Age: 34 Posts: 723	Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins If we have a running back other than Portis next year starting we will already be ahead the game.

12-20-2009, 09:21 PM	#22
CultBrennan59 Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 5,570	Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins IF Mike Shanahan comes here, this is what I see happening. -Our first pick will be a QB, because OLineman are rich in free agency especially guys who know shanahans system like mentioned before. I see us getting Sam Bradford.(If he's not available then I see us getting Okung from Oklahoma state, plus some other good OT's that are juniors are declaring this year so you know some will drop and we could get one with our second rounder) -We make a play for Brandon Marshall for sure -We bring in at least one offensive lineman (Logan Mankins, and Marcus McNeil are free agents) -Portis is surprisingly kept because he knows Shanahans offense well and can teach Ganther and the RB we'll bring in through the draft (Betts is gone, possibly Cartwright) -We also make a play for Keith Bulluck of the Titans, and Josh Cribbs for our poor return game -Orakpo gets moved to DE, and Bob Slowik will probably be our DC after Blache retires -Levi Jones is resigned and Rocky is signed to a long term deal. Dockery and Levi will most likely be the only guys from this current line who are on it next year. Rabach maybe gone, as well as heyer (or kept as a backup) -Possible OL for next year Levi Jones, Dockery, Rabach?, Chris Kuper/Chester Pitts, Russell Okung Jones, Dockery, Rabach?, Mike Iupati (rookie; Idaho), Tyson Clabo -Antwaan Randel El, Randy Thomas, Chris Samuels, Philip Daniels, Cornelius Griffin, Fred Smoot, Todd Collins, and Justin Tryon gone. With Portis, Rabach, Moss, Cooley, Campbell?, Heyer, Fletcher?, Landry, Carter, Rogers all on the fence as to who stays/ goes/gets traded.

12-20-2009, 09:24 PM	#24
Lotus Mann Up HOF! Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS Posts: 8,906	Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins We will win the Super Bowl if we sign Pacman Jones. __________________ Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.

12-20-2009, 09:30 PM	#25
dmek25 MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 51 Posts: 10,438	Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins no way Shanahan brings Marshall here. there were reports that he was ready to cut him, but he got fired instead. tired of his antics __________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan

12-20-2009, 09:33 PM	#27
Ruhskins Gamebreaker Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34 Posts: 14,592	Re: Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins Are people with all these theories taking into consideration how some free agents are going to be RFAs with the uncapped year? Just asking because many sites that have list of free agents don't have this information. I think Yahoo Sports has a list of UFAs and RFAs based on an uncapped year. __________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Diehardskin's Theory of the 2010 Redskins

NFL Draft Central