Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


Redskins pick 4th in the draft

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-25-2010, 02:56 PM   #241
What will Shanny do this offseason?
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,318
Re: Redskins pick 4th in the draft

We trade Jason Campbell and the #4 pick for the 49ers 13th, 17th and 3 rounder. Use those picks to select Mike Iupati and Bruce Campbel in the first round. Pick Colt McCoy or the top QB Shanahan sees fit.
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-25-2010, 03:05 PM   #242
Impact Rookie
 
SOUL-SKINS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 868
Re: Redskins pick 4th in the draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehardskin2982 View Post
We trade Jason Campbell and the #4 pick for the 49ers 13th, 17th and 3 rounder. Use those picks to select Mike Iupati and Bruce Campbel in the first round. Pick Colt McCoy or the top QB Shanahan sees fit.
That is so not going to happen. So you're telling me Campbell is worth a 1st and a 3rd..............ummmm we'd be lucky to get just a 3rd round pick for him.
__________________
TODD COLLINS WILL ALWAYS HOLD A SPECIAL PLACE IN MY HEART
SOUL-SKINS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 03:16 PM   #243
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,661
Re: Redskins pick 4th in the draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehardskin2982 View Post
We trade Jason Campbell and the #4 pick for the 49ers 13th, 17th and 3 rounder. Use those picks to select Mike Iupati and Bruce Campbel in the first round. Pick Colt McCoy or the top QB Shanahan sees fit.
Iupati is not a good fit in this scheme. Maybe they could make it work but he's to much of a mauler to fit into a zone blocking scheme. Iupati is also likely to be available in the second round.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 03:16 PM   #244
Pro Bowl
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,392
Re: Redskins pick 4th in the draft

If JC is worth a 1rst and a 3rd....why would we WANT to get rid of him?
__________________
"Cautiously And Optimistically... Looking Forward To Change"
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 03:53 PM   #245
What will Shanny do this offseason?
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,318
Re: Redskins pick 4th in the draft

I think a top 5 pick and JC would be enough to get those picks from SF. I would even be willing to trade Carter instead JC (he's not as good in a 3-4) if they wanted him.
If Iupati is around in the second round I'd take him in a heart beat. He will be the next Kevin Mawae, Mangold, Faneca type of interior lineman and I would draft him based off of his talent and will coach him into the type of lineman that I want him to be.
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 04:55 PM   #246
Impact Rookie
 
tootergray34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 681
Re: Redskins pick 4th in the draft

cause JC is a indecisive bum!
tootergray34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 02:19 PM   #247
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: Redskins pick 4th in the draft

1. St. Louis (1-15)
2. Detroit (2-14)
3. Tampa Bay (3-13)
4. Washington (4-12)
5. Kansas City (4-12)
6. Seattle (5-11)
7. Cleveland (5-11)
8. Oakland (5-11)
9. Buffalo (6-10)
10t. Denver (acquired from Chicago) (7-9)*
10t. Jacksonville (7-9)*
12. Miami (7-9)
13. San Francisco (8-8)
14. Seattle (acquired from Denver) (8-8)
15. New York Giants (8-8)
16t. Tennessee (8-8)
16t. San Francisco (acquired from Carolina) (8-8)
18. Pittsburgh (9-7)
19t. Atlanta (9-7) *
19t. Houston (9-7)

Out of the 1st 20picks, the only teams i could see that could draft a QB are St Louis, Sea, Buff, SF (maybe if they are not sold on Alex S and his improvement). Yes, SF could move up from 13 or 16 and get our 4th and still have their 2nd 1st rounder. I'm sure we would be able to snag a 2nd rounder from SF too. Win/Win for both teams. We may not get JC or SB but we'd have 3 picks in the top 40 or so.

If St Louis doesn't take a QB and takes Suh. I think we are going to have many options. Sorry if all this has been said, just trying to talk some Skins.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 02:46 PM   #248
Impact Rookie
 
tootergray34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 681
Re: Redskins pick 4th in the draft

I just don't think SF will make that trade man, I really think we are going to go Bradford with this choice...there is a reason that 90% of the mock drafts have us taking Bradford....like it or not, it's time for a new QB change in the nation's capital.
tootergray34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 03:08 PM   #249
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 26
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins pick 4th in the draft

Bradford is who I would go with of the two of them as well, but he's just the classic college underclassman top ten quarterback. He's got a legitimate track record of success (two years worth) under one team. This year was supposed to be the big test to Bradford's candidacy of a first overall type quarterback, and well, it was incomplete at best and a massive failure at worst.

Bradford could be a Mike Williams (the WR, not the OT) or a Rex Grossman. There's little statistical evidence to suggest he isn't. But what film we actually have on him is overwhelmingly positive. That doesn't mean he's not a bust, especially in Washington, but he does LOOK like a first overall type quarterback for the world. Obviously, things aren't as they appear, but he appears to be an accurate passer behind a great offensive line. A team like St. Louis with a strong, young OL should seriously consider Bradford at first overall. A team like Washington probably shouldn't risk it.

Clausen is someone I think we know way more about. He holds the ball a long time, he has a good arm (but not a great arm), is accurate downfield, but definitely lived off the jump ball as a sophomore and a junior. If we take Jimmy Clausen at No. 4, I think we know what we are getting: a guy who in many ways is a Jason Campbell clone, but does offer the ability to throw downfield and to the sideline with intent, where Campbell is a lot more comfortable throwing in the middle of the field.

Right now though, our passing game is built to go to the middle of the field. We'd be better in the short-term with Campbell than Clausen, and Campbell is a better fit for a Shanahan styled offense than Clausen is. He'd probably be more decisive in the offense than Clausen would be. But obviously, you could take Clausen with the intent to put the offense around him over time, and then it would make more sense.

In the end, you'd probably get an efficient passer who has a good TD/INT ratio and high completion percentage who sometimes makes boneheaded plays with the football. Essentially, Campbell, but younger. Bradford gives us something that we don't currently have, but someone who would probably need to sit, for risk of getting killed with these current teammates.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 03:39 PM   #250
Registered User
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,917
Re: Redskins pick 4th in the draft

I think, depending on Shanahan's feelings about Campbell, we'll either

A. Draft Bradford at 4 and trade our 2nd round pick and a player or future pick to get back in to the 1st and take a tackle in the lower part of the first round; or

B. Trade down (most likely with SF), picking up thieir #13/#16 and 2nd round pick and not drafting a QB until later in the draft.

It really depends on how Shanahan truly feels about Campbell. There's also the chance that because of our interest in Bradford, another team trades ahead of us to get him. I don't see that being likely though. Trading into the top 3 just gets too expensive. If, for some stupid reason, St. Louis takes Bradford instead of Suh, then all bets are off and i dont see us being able to trade down.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 03:45 PM   #251
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,732
Re: Redskins pick 4th in the draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat View Post
I think, depending on Shanahan's feelings about Campbell, we'll either

A. Draft Bradford at 4 and trade our 2nd round pick and a player or future pick to get back in to the 1st and take a tackle in the lower part of the first round; or

B. Trade down (most likely with SF), picking up thieir #13/#16 and 2nd round pick and not drafting a QB until later in the draft.

It really depends on how Shanahan truly feels about Campbell. There's also the chance that because of our interest in Bradford, another team trades ahead of us to get him. I don't see that being likely though. Trading into the top 3 just gets too expensive. If, for some stupid reason, St. Louis takes Bradford instead of Suh, then all bets are off and i dont see us being able to trade down.
BHA, I think you pointed out that we should, as Redskins fans, be hoping for a rookie salary cap this year. I think both sides are trying to get that accomplished this year, and if they did the Redskins might be the largest beneficiary because it would open up top level trades to more teams. I hope that they do get one in place, and then we find a way to trade down - assuming Okung and/or Bradford are both gone.
__________________
Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.24970 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25