Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-14-2010, 04:54 AM   #91
The Starter
 
DBUCHANON101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

#4 "worth it picks" imo
Okung
McClain
Suh
Haden -too high but he is a very good Corner.
Berry- reminds me of a certain Skin we all hold near and dear. makes plays
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on.
DBUCHANON101 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-14-2010, 05:04 AM   #92
The Starter
 
DBUCHANON101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Chad Jones S from LSU is also a playmaker to look at in the later rounds.
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on.
DBUCHANON101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 05:59 AM   #93
Impact Rookie
 
tootergray34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 681
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

we've already got one BUST safety from LSU...we don't need another. I'll take ciron black in rounds 4 or later though. I think we need to trade back, take CJ Spiller and hope that Brian Baluga is still around, in round two we can take the Pouncey kid from UF to replace Rabach.

It seems from what I read that Shanny wants to keep JC around...which is a good thing in reality...cause we have so many other holes...and while JC may not be a Brady or a Bree's or any other so claimed studs in the league...he is serviceable and had a great season behind our patchwork OLINE that we had.

what we need is some playmakers to surround him with, and most importantly...somebody to protect his rear end so he can turn his back to the defense on playfakes and not have to worry about getting creamed!
tootergray34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 06:18 AM   #94
The Starter
 
DBUCHANON101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by tootergray34 View Post
we've already got one BUST safety from LSU...we don't need another. I'll take ciron black in rounds 4 or later though. I think we need to trade back, take CJ Spiller and hope that Brian Baluga is still around, in round two we can take the Pouncey kid from UF to replace Rabach.

It seems from what I read that Shanny wants to keep JC around...which is a good thing in reality...cause we have so many other holes...and while JC may not be a Brady or a Bree's or any other so claimed studs in the league...he is serviceable and had a great season behind our patchwork OLINE that we had.

what we need is some playmakers to surround him with, and most importantly...somebody to protect his rear end so he can turn his back to the defense on playfakes and not have to worry about getting creamed!
So because 1 player at a position from a school failed that means every other player at that position from the same school that follows is destined to fail also?? Landry has failed with us, i recall another safety that didnt do to well with us who went to the Steelers and was a starter on a championship defense. --Ryan Clark-- Maybe just maybe it was on the coaches of our defense and there are reasons that they are no longer here. Who knows, maybe Haslett can get LL to play up to his potential. But to say a player will fail because another player at the same position / same school did is just foolish.
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on.
DBUCHANON101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 07:24 AM   #95
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 53
Posts: 10,519
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

i don't know if you can say R Clark didnt do well here. his level of play was alittle more then adequate. and he kept Taylor in check
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 07:28 AM   #96
Special Teams
 
redskin37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oneida N.Y
Posts: 132
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

If the skins don't spend major $$ in free agency on the o line. How can anyone say that they should not use the first 2 draft pick on a tackle and guard or center is mind boggling to me.
redskin37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 12:28 PM   #97
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,728
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Just a note, turns out we might be able to get Terrance Cody in the Second Round, if we really are switching to the 3-4 then he would be a great acquisition. However personally I would only be on board with it if we were able to get picks more picks from trades, which is possible thanks to the lack of free agents available on the market trades for veterans will probably be on the rise. Still I want to see the team come away with either Bradford/Brown (T, USC) or Okung/ McCoy (QB Texas) with our first two picks.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 01:38 PM   #98
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by redskin37 View Post
If the skins don't spend major $$ in free agency on the o line. How can anyone say that they should not use the first 2 draft pick on a tackle and guard or center is mind boggling to me.
O line needs to be addressed but there are some other positions on the team w/aging players, e.g. MLB, and positions that might see departures; CB, RB.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2010, 03:44 PM   #99
Camp Scrub
 
Redskin301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Bring on Bradford the next Payton manning
Redskin301 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 03:02 AM   #100
Special Teams
 
LandrySlice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AFGHANISTAN
Posts: 334
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

bradford the next manning? I doubt it, but that would be nice!
__________________
Don't tase me bro!!!!
LandrySlice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 04:56 AM   #101
The Starter
 
DBUCHANON101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Joe Haden! -ducks and runs for the door-
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on.
DBUCHANON101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 10:53 AM   #102
The Starter
 
Redskin Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,505
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

NFL Draft - 2010 Draft Prospects - CBSSports.com - NFLDraftScout.com
__________________
WIN, LOSE OR DRAW I'M A DIE-HARD REDSKIN FAN!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
First they ban winning...now this?
Redskin Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 02:34 PM   #103
The Starter
 
T.O.Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,030
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Speaking of drafts, did anyone notice that Cody Glenn is on the active roster for the Colts and made a huge play on special teams. Did anyone other than me, realize that Jasper Brinkley, the starting middle linebacker for the Vickings was our pick that we traded for more picks.
T.O.Killa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 02:59 PM   #104
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 31
Posts: 2,726
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
Speaking of drafts, did anyone notice that Cody Glenn is on the active roster for the Colts and made a huge play on special teams. Did anyone other than me, realize that Jasper Brinkley, the starting middle linebacker for the Vickings was our pick that we traded for more picks.
If he was on the Oline i'd be pissed
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 03:12 PM   #105
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,875
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
Speaking of drafts, did anyone notice that Cody Glenn is on the active roster for the Colts and made a huge play on special teams. Did anyone other than me, realize that Jasper Brinkley, the starting middle linebacker for the Vickings was our pick that we traded for more picks.
Are you sure about Brinkley? I don't recall us or the Vikings being involved in any trade with each other in 2009 other than Erasmus James for a 7th rounder, and I think Brinkley was a 5th rounder

As for Glenn, when we drafted him most people were blasting the front office for drafting a converted running back.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.27046 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25