Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2010, 02:21 PM   #106
The Starter
 
T.O.Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,029
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Yeah Brinkley was our pick. It moved us down and we took Glenn, and got the the pick we used to pick Eddie Williams in the seventh.
T.O.Killa is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-17-2010, 10:29 PM   #107
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,634
Who Will Be A Redskin?

__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 10:37 PM   #108
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,013
Re: Who Will Be A Redskin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
I'll take #76 with the number four overall please.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 10:42 PM   #109
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,634
Re: Who Will Be A Redskin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
I'll take #76 with the number four overall please.
Lol, I also am going to have this made.



See after we lock up home field advantage in week 13, we're going to rest our starters including our QB and O-Line. When that happens we're going to have Cerrato play QB behind a line made up of practice squad players. Jason Campbell will call plays, word is he likes to call a lot of 7 step drops.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 03:39 PM   #110
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,634
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

A few more possible Redskins:


And from the "You Wish" collection:
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 04:05 PM   #111
Pro Bowl
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,392
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Good stuff Dirtbag! I'll have one of each please srarting with Okung.
__________________
"Cautiously And Optimistically... Looking Forward To Change"
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 07:46 PM   #112
The Starter
 
TheSmurfs22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Staunton, VA
Posts: 1,103
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Please Redskins DO NOT draft a qb with the first pick! Go for Okung!
__________________
F#$% the Cowpukes!
TheSmurfs22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 07:50 PM   #113
Mann Up HOF!
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 10,621
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

We could do like Jax did last year and use our first two picks on tackles, such as Okung in the 1st and Charles Brown in the second. Then, hopefully, our tackle problems would be solved for years.
__________________
Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2010, 08:03 PM   #114
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,634
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
We could do like Jax did last year and use our first two picks on tackles, such as Okung in the 1st and Charles Brown in the second. Then, hopefully, our tackle problems would be solved for years.
Only thing that worries me about that is the fact that Jacksonville went 8-8 this year, add to that the fact that a good amount of people have said that Garrard and Campbell seem to be similar players and you wonder if it would just result in another mediocre year. Then again maybe we have better coaching and could do more with a similar level of talent. Of course obviously things don't exactly translate (ie if Team X did this then when we do that we'll get the same result as Team X).
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 04:11 PM   #115
Camp Scrub
 
skinzfan4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Bradford scares me,yea he has talent but his throwing shoulder has been crunched.and stuff like that becomes a life long problem.also he is a small quaterback as well,there are other people for consideration out there and then trade downs that could get us more picks.Terry the Tenn safety would give us a player close to SEan T. and he has been missed in more ways than has been stated.we have no ballhawking safeties at all.Landry is regressing and if Terry's shoulder is sound then he would give us a turnover creator and help to the cb's they lacked last year.terry is also a thumper and can intimidate wr's coming over the middle.Suh will be gone but if by some crazy thing he is still there we would need him.we haynesworth and unless we are going 3-4 then we need another dt.Griff is becoming more and more of a part timer.Golhston and Monty ar part timers that play good in stretches but haven't shown that they are cpaable of becoming full timers.we needlb's and oline guards and center.theres alot of holes on this team.i really hope that shanahan doesn't try a do that small oline thing in this division.i don't think it will fly so he will have to augment some of his style to fit the nfc beast.but this ab crop hasn't set me ablaze with desire and like i said with the shouldser thing and it being his throwing shoulder to boot makes hima risky propositio to me.with that type of injury you ar more suseptable to more injuries to the same arear,even career ending stuff.
skinzfan4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 04:28 PM   #116
The Starter
 
Redskin Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,488
Re: Who Will Be A Redskin

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
I guarantee you that one of these people will be a redskin come April. I say Okung.
Give me #76 in the 1st round
Give me #71 in the 2nd round
Give me #13 in the 4th round (I like him)
__________________
WIN, LOSE OR DRAW I'M A DIE-HARD REDSKIN FAN!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
First they ban winning...now this?
Redskin Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 05:42 PM   #117
Special Teams
 
RedskinMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Odenton, MD
Age: 35
Posts: 301
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
Only thing that worries me about that is the fact that Jacksonville went 8-8 this year, add to that the fact that a good amount of people have said that Garrard and Campbell seem to be similar players and you wonder if it would just result in another mediocre year. Then again maybe we have better coaching and could do more with a similar level of talent. Of course obviously things don't exactly translate (ie if Team X did this then when we do that we'll get the same result as Team X).
That would not be a move to win next year but for years to come. It would be possible that because it would be an upgrade and coupled with better coaching we could be alot better. But 8-8 next year would be better than most people would expect for us.
RedskinMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 05:53 PM   #118
Impact Rookie
 
JLee9718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 567
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

We don't need Bradford or Clausen. We need offensive linemen! Then after we fix the line, get a QB.
JLee9718 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 03:11 PM   #119
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,634
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLee9718 View Post
We don't need Bradford or Clausen. We need offensive linemen! Then after we fix the line, get a QB.
Where do we get the QB? Do we do the Gruden system where we draft every QB under the sun and hope that one of the 5 QB's that ends up on our roster develops despite lack of reps?

If we end up taking our QB in the next two years then thats one or two years worth of development we miss out on, not to mention the fact that trading up to get the QB prospect we want is probably going to cost us as much as a 2nd and 3rd round pick. Thats possibly two offensive lineman or at the very least two starters.

Do you really want to trade the farm for Jake Locker and his 58% completion percentage or Bradford and his 65%+ completion percentage? Not to mention the fact that Bradford is one of the most accurate QB's to come out of college in a long time. Did I mention that he put up huge numbers in a pro style offense as a red shirt freshman (36 TD's 8 Int's), then got a whole new system the next year only to win the Heisman?

If we're going to take a QB, then we're going to do it now. We're in as good of a position as ever and when it comes down to it we only need to find one or two QB's.

On the other hand we're going to need as many as 7 quality offensive lineman and passing on a QB of Bradfords caliber is just simply bad judegement. Okung is dominant, but the fact of the matter is Bradford is a better QB then Okung is a Tackle. My only hope is that the Rams get scared off by Bradfords shoulder and take Clausen or Suh.

In the end if you're building for the long run you take the QB now and spend four or five picks over the next two years, along with free agents, to rebuild the O-Line. Thinking you can completely fix the O-Line in one offseason is pretty far fetched.

Also before I forget just take a look at the O-Lines in the Super Bowl. You have one first round pick playing in it and he was picked at 13 (Jamaal Brown). The rest were well scouted guys that were picked after the first. The Saints for example have a 1st and 2nd at tackle, a 4th and 5th at Guard (the best Guard Tandem in the league), and a 5th at center.

The Colts have an UDFA and 4th at Tackle, Two UDFA's (including former Redskin Kyle DeVan), and an UDFA at Center. Behind those guys they have two second round picks that will probably end up taking over in the next year or two.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 03:55 PM   #120
Pro Bowl
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,392
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
Where do we get the QB? Do we do the Gruden system where we draft every QB under the sun and hope that one of the 5 QB's that ends up on our roster develops despite lack of reps?

If we end up taking our QB in the next two years then thats one or two years worth of development we miss out on, not to mention the fact that trading up to get the QB prospect we want is probably going to cost us as much as a 2nd and 3rd round pick. Thats possibly two offensive lineman or at the very least two starters.

Do you really want to trade the farm for Jake Locker and his 58% completion percentage or Bradford and his 65%+ completion percentage? Not to mention the fact that Bradford is one of the most accurate QB's to come out of college in a long time. Did I mention that he put up huge numbers in a pro style offense as a red shirt freshman (36 TD's 8 Int's), then got a whole new system the next year only to win the Heisman?

If we're going to take a QB, then we're going to do it now. We're in as good of a position as ever and when it comes down to it we only need to find one or two QB's.

On the other hand we're going to need as many as 7 quality offensive lineman and passing on a QB of Bradfords caliber is just simply bad judegement. Okung is dominant, but the fact of the matter is Bradford is a better QB then Okung is a Tackle. My only hope is that the Rams get scared off by Bradfords shoulder and take Clausen or Suh.

In the end if you're building for the long run you take the QB now and spend four or five picks over the next two years, along with free agents, to rebuild the O-Line. Thinking you can completely fix the O-Line in one offseason is pretty far fetched.
On the NFL level I think that is yet to be decided. Even though Bradford has a ton of potential, he also has many more questions about his transition to the pros than Okung. I haven't seen a scouting report yet that didn't project Okung to be a starter from day one.
__________________
"Cautiously And Optimistically... Looking Forward To Change"
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.37111 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25