Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-25-2010, 08:52 AM   #76
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 86,444
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

6'6 320 is too small?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-25-2010, 08:54 AM   #77
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,861
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
6'6 320 is too small?
For an elephant, yes. LOL.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried - Agianst

"If you have to debate which of your 3 QBs is your best, you don't have a QB. Say it with me now... it... doesn't... matter." Schneed
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 05:07 PM   #78
Special Teams
 
RedskinMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Odenton, MD
Age: 36
Posts: 346
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
I'm speculating as well as you ant SI is. Yes they think he was worthy of the draft spot but it doesn't mean he actually would have been drafted there. It all depends on what teams need and what teams had him on there radar and well after the draft we heard from media people saying some teams felt we reached for him taking him in the 1st round and some teams wondered why we even drafted him because they felt JC would have been available after the draft as a UFA. But.... as I said it's all speculation. What we do know is he was drafted in the 1st round. Whether he's worthy of that spot is opinion.

My opinion? JC was most likely worthy of a 4,5,or 6th round spot and was majorly coached up. He's definitly a great back up QB. We need a Franchise QB though for the long haul. Hopefully between Dad and Son the Shanahan's can find one where ever they draft him.
Nobody thought Campbell was going to go undrafted. It might have been a reach to take him in the first but there wasn't an analyst anywhere who did not have campbell as a top 3 round talent.
RedskinMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 05:22 PM   #79
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
....I personally feel like Edwin Williams and Kory Lichtensteiger are going to work out well for our interior. Heck Casey Rabach might have his best season for the first time in a while. The thing we do know right now is that we need two tackles. Maybe for now the best COA would be to add one this year early in the draft and use Levi Jones as a stopgap at RT but theres a lot of time between now and the draft.
What we also know right now is that Bruce Allen is a member of this site and he's been reading my past posts

http://www.thewarpath.net/nfl-draft-...tml#post429251 (The Official draft Marcus Monk thread.)

I didn't even know we picked up KL until I read your post, see how much I'm paying attention.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 05:25 PM   #80
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 27
Posts: 15,994
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Something that just hit me now is that the argument to draft a QB at No. 4 is identical to the BPA argument.

I.e. we don't have a pressing concern at quarterback, but if a franchise guy is available at number four, we should take him and not think twice about it.

I agree with the logic. But that's the BPA argument that we always poked Vinny for, and a lot of people are using the same logic to suggest that Bradford/Clausen should be the pick.

/off-topic rant.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 05:54 PM   #81
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 30
Posts: 14,750
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
6'6 320 is too small?
What do you expect us to do with a 6'6 tackle in the Ravens-Redskins intersquad basketball tournament? Jared Gaither is 6'9, we still don't have anyone to cover him!!!!
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 06:05 PM   #82
Pro Bowl
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,473
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Something that just hit me now is that the argument to draft a QB at No. 4 is identical to the BPA argument.

I.e. we don't have a pressing concern at quarterback, but if a franchise guy is available at number four, we should take him and not think twice about it.

I agree with the logic. But that's the BPA argument that we always poked Vinny for, and a lot of people are using the same logic to suggest that Bradford/Clausen should be the pick.

/off-topic rant.
What gets me is that neither guy has really shown alot over a 2-3 year span. And with this logic, if the chosen one doesn't live up to the hype, do we draft the BQBA at #1 next year and every year thereafter until we get the one who has actually earned the hype? A #4 pick in the first round doesn't come around often. I hope we use it wisely and for someone who can win a starting job.... like this year.
__________________
"I'm buying what Scott McCloughan is selling. Count me IN! HTTR!!!"
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 10:15 PM   #83
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Didn't know where to put this so thought I would put it here. This is Mike Mayock's early release of the top draft prospects.
Despite injury, Bradford tops list of QBs in initial prospect rankings
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 10:23 PM   #84
Registered User
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
Didn't know where to put this so thought I would put it here. This is Mike Mayock's early release of the top draft prospects.
Despite injury, Bradford tops list of QBs in initial prospect rankings
Mayock always has a few randoms or misses in his top 5 for each position. For example, Lamar houston and Dan Williams over Terrance Cody? Bryan Bulaga over Anthony Davis and Trent Williams???
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 11:22 PM   #85
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,861
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Something that just hit me now is that the argument to draft a QB at No. 4 is identical to the BPA argument.

I.e. we don't have a pressing concern at quarterback, but if a franchise guy is available at number four, we should take him and not think twice about it.

I agree with the logic. But that's the BPA argument that we always poked Vinny for, and a lot of people are using the same logic to suggest that Bradford/Clausen should be the pick.

/off-topic rant.
A lot of people have the Vinny Cerrato mentality, just look at the thread where people gush over Sanchez, while completely disregarding the great offensive line and running game that the Jets have created.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried - Agianst

"If you have to debate which of your 3 QBs is your best, you don't have a QB. Say it with me now... it... doesn't... matter." Schneed
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 11:45 PM   #86
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 30
Posts: 14,750
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
A lot of people have the Vinny Cerrato mentality, just look at the thread where people gush over Sanchez, while completely disregarding the great offensive line and running game that the Jets have created.
I hate to say it but the Jets got very lucky this year. They're definitely a good team but look at the facts. They had 5 field goals missed against them in their first two playoff games. The last two games of the season where they needed to win out to get to the playoffs they were able to get games where their opponents were resting most of their starters for the second half.

They finally went up against a team with a solid O-Line (not great like the Jets), a good defense, and a franchise QB and basically couldn't keep up once the second half started. And by the way they should have lost to the Chargers. I mean great story that a gritty team like them won but if Nate Kaeding makes 2 of those kicks the Jets are going home a week early.

The Jets success next year will depend heavily on Sanchez becoming an 80+ QB. Make no mistake they worked for what they got but they still had a lot of help along the way.

We will add O-Lineman through the draft. Possibly as many as 3 if BA's draft record holds up. It's just that everyone shouldn't be surprised if it isn't with the #4 pick. Trust me, if it is a QB, you'll be thanking the front office by the end of the 2012 season, and not in a sarcastic way like....you know, "thanks Vinny." This isn't your Vinny Cerrato Redskins. If Vinny Cerrato was running this draft we'd be looking at a S, WR, CB, LB, K, and QB.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33 View Post
I didn't even know we picked up KL until I read your post, see how much I'm paying attention.
Ha ha, I feel like I'm doing a public service now. Something like
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 10:23 AM   #87
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
I hate to say it but the Jets got very lucky this year. They're definitely a good team but look at the facts. They had 5 field goals missed against them in their first two playoff games. The last two games of the season where they needed to win out to get to the playoffs they were able to get games where their opponents were resting most of their starters for the second half.

They finally went up against a team with a solid O-Line (not great like the Jets), a good defense, and a franchise QB and basically couldn't keep up once the second half started. And by the way they should have lost to the Chargers. I mean great story that a gritty team like them won but if Nate Kaeding makes 2 of those kicks the Jets are going home a week early.

The Jets success next year will depend heavily on Sanchez becoming an 80+ QB. Make no mistake they worked for what they got but they still had a lot of help along the way.

We will add O-Lineman through the draft. Possibly as many as 3 if BA's draft record holds up. It's just that everyone shouldn't be surprised if it isn't with the #4 pick. Trust me, if it is a QB, you'll be thanking the front office by the end of the 2012 season, and not in a sarcastic way like....you know, "thanks Vinny." This isn't your Vinny Cerrato Redskins. If Vinny Cerrato was running this draft we'd be looking at a S, WR, CB, LB, K, and QB.



Ha ha, I feel like I'm doing a public service now. Something like
Yes. Something that seems to get lost in this conversation is a longer-term perspective. Suppose that over the next two offseasons we rebuild the offensive line so that it is quite good by 2011 or 2012. Don't we want a Philip Rivers or other bigtime QB behind them, when that happens? If so, you don't get such a QB very often in the lower rounds. Typically such a QB can only be found in the first 5 picks (there are exceptions, of course).

So, in the longer term perspective, if Shanny sees someone that he thinks is a true franchise QB at #4, it actually makes sense to take him, even with our enormous offensive line needs.

I'm not arguing to take a QB. But many people see the argument as an OL/QB either/or for 2010 only, and it seems to me that in long-term perspective things are more complex than that.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 10:27 AM   #88
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,769
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedskinMike View Post
Nobody thought Campbell was going to go undrafted. It might have been a reach to take him in the first but there wasn't an analyst anywhere who did not have campbell as a top 3 round talent.
Not only was it a reach to take him in the first round it was complete stupidity to give away 3 draft picks to make that reach.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 06:38 PM   #89
Special Teams
 
RedskinMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Odenton, MD
Age: 36
Posts: 346
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish View Post
Not only was it a reach to take him in the first round it was complete stupidity to give away 3 draft picks to make that reach.
They gave up 2 and swapped 1sts. But the point I was trying to make was he would not of slipped past the third round let alone go undrafted.
RedskinMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 07:23 PM   #90
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 30
Posts: 14,750
Re: 79 Mock Drafts: Sam Bradford still Redskins projected choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedskinMike View Post
They gave up 2 and swapped 1sts. But the point I was trying to make was he would not of slipped past the third round let alone go undrafted.
In all fairness he was projected to go to the Browns at 34 if he slipped by the Redskins at 25.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.33346 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25