Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-01-2010, 11:01 PM   #196
Pro Bowl
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,391
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

I honestly would have a terrible time picking between Suh and Berry. But just for the sake of discussion, here's an article talking about why safetys are becoming more valued.

Four good options in search for the next great safety
__________________
"Cautiously And Optimistically... Looking Forward To Change"
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-01-2010, 11:09 PM   #197
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 28
Posts: 14,418
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
As much as I'd be tempted, truthfully I'd prefer Best...and I wouldn't take him at #4

Who said Okung was going to the Chiefs via a trade?
THAT WAS YOU YA BASTARD! Either way I guess your strategy is "Best" player available ha ha ha....oh that was lame.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
No but I mean all up to the combine, its been a 'lock' for Suh to go to the Rams, and now its like people are re-realizing that Bradfords good after he gains 13 lbs. They should have already known that he's good just by all the tape they've had of him and time they've had to watch it.
How do you know that? The only people saying that the Rams were taking Suh were the mock draft experts. Todd McShay also told me that Anthony Davis was going to blow the combine wide open, that didn't happen either.
__________________
"Hey baby, wake up from your a sleep." -Zlad

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 11:40 PM   #198
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,581
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

LOL. Go back and read what I wrote. I didn't say the Chiefs were planning to trade up to take Okung. I said the Lions and Chiefs are rumored to be discussing a deal that would give the Lions Glen Dorsey (but not for the #2 overall pick) and free up the Lions to take Okung with the #2 pick.

The Chiefs would stay at #5 and possibly take Bulaga (maybe McLain)
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 11:40 PM   #199
Special Teams
 
PHazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Originally Portsmouth, VA but now Ocala, FL
Posts: 207
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Assuming our roster stays as is (as in we don't trade Landry) I give the edge to Suh. I think Suh has the chance to be Haynesworth at his best, a dominating game changing DT. McCoy to me is another Renaldo Wynn type, a solid run-stopping DT/DE who you can count on to do the dirty work for years to come. I want more than that at #4
Why get someone we already have (i.e. the haynesworth comparison) If we didnt have Hanyesworth i could picture it. And we will be using more of a 3-4 then a 4-3 so we dont need a dominating game changing DT. we'd need a NT. Suh is not a NT, n neither is McCoy. So now we use the #4 pick on a DT that we'd be sliding out to DE in a 3-4? So ill repeat, take a DLineman high in a defense based on DE's eating up blocks so the LBs can make plays? Berry would be the more "game changing" player for the redskins and their new scheme. Id like to reiterate tho, that Okung should be the pick if hes not swept up by the lions.

And how Bruce Allen keeps saying "we're gonna take the best player for the REDSKINS" makes it sound like hes bracing the Redskins nation for him to not grab an OT with that #4 pick
__________________
If "The Future is Now" why would we use our #4 Pick on a QB who will spend the 1st year on the bench?
PHazard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 11:48 PM   #200
Mann Up HOF!
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 10,438
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by PHazard View Post
Why get someone we already have (i.e. the haynesworth comparison) If we didnt have Hanyesworth i could picture it. And we will be using more of a 3-4 then a 4-3 so we dont need a dominating game changing DT. we'd need a NT. Suh is not a NT, n neither is McCoy. So now we use the #4 pick on a DT that we'd be sliding out to DE in a 3-4? So ill repeat, take a DLineman high in a defense based on DE's eating up blocks so the LBs can make plays? Berry would be the more "game changing" player for the redskins and their new scheme. Id like to reiterate tho, that Okung should be the pick if hes not swept up by the lions.

And how Bruce Allen keeps saying "we're gonna take the best player for the REDSKINS" makes it sound like hes bracing the Redskins nation for him to not grab an OT with that #4 pick
Suh or McCoy can play nose tackle, just like Jay Ratliff can.
__________________
Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 11:49 PM   #201
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,581
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

Fair points, I just don't know about how Landry and Berry together would work. Of the three options given I'd be fine with any of them

Incidentally, I think Nate Allen could be a solid 2nd-3rd round option at safety
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 11:51 PM   #202
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 28
Posts: 14,418
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
LOL. Go back and read what I wrote. I didn't say the Chiefs were planning to trade up to take Okung. I said the Lions and Chiefs are rumored to be discussing a deal that would give the Lions Glen Dorsey (but not for the #2 overall pick) and free up the Lions to take Okung with the #2 pick.

The Chiefs would stay at #5 and possibly take Bulaga (maybe McLain)
Crap thats even worse. Not only does Dorsey go to the NFC on a promising young team but Detroit gets our tackle. Oh well, I'll believe when I see it. Sure it's ignorant but I've already seen a Dorsey trade fall through with the Falcons last year. Though I do think the Falcons should have pulled the trigger considering that they just ended up drafting Jerry the DT from Ole Miss.

Crap now I'm starting to like Jevan Sneed.

Didn't realize that so much of that offense was getting the ball downfield instead of padding stats with dump offs.
__________________
"Hey baby, wake up from your a sleep." -Zlad

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 11:55 PM   #203
Special Teams
 
PHazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Originally Portsmouth, VA but now Ocala, FL
Posts: 207
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

Well Laron Landry belongs near the line of scrimmage in he box, timing blitzes and supporting the run. Eric Berry is a poor man's ed reed. But has potential to be a rich mans ed reed as well. Eric Berry pointed out that he has been an impact player since he stepped on Tennessee's campus and the same cant be said about McCoy or Suh. I saw nate allen during senior bowl practices and liked what i saw. But i dont think we should take a safety anywhere in this draft unless its @ 4 n Berry is there. I think we have much bigger needs for 2, 4, 5, n 7th picks. Im just saying @ 4 with Okung off the board he's easily a consideration.
__________________
If "The Future is Now" why would we use our #4 Pick on a QB who will spend the 1st year on the bench?
PHazard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 02:43 AM   #204
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 28
Posts: 14,418
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

Actually Smoot if you like Snead so much then make it official and send him a Facebook friend request. I already got Charles Brown, alright not really but a few years ago I became friends with Lance Ball and DeAngelo Williams. Now I don't really use Facebook anymore.

Jevan Snead | Facebook

And for the rest of you Okung lovers:

Russell Okung | Facebook
__________________
"Hey baby, wake up from your a sleep." -Zlad

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 08:54 AM   #205
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
Actually Smoot if you like Snead so much then make it official and send him a Facebook friend request. I already got Charles Brown, alright not really but a few years ago I became friends with Lance Ball and DeAngelo Williams. Now I don't really use Facebook anymore.

Jevan Snead | Facebook

And for the rest of you Okung lovers:

Russell Okung | Facebook
That's really weird, man. You're like a 15 year-old girl.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 09:07 AM   #206
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 44
Posts: 3,386
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
That's really weird, man. You're like a 15 year-old girl.
That's funny, true but funny.
NYCskinfan82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 02:27 PM   #207
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 28
Posts: 14,418
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
That's really weird, man. You're like a 15 year-old girl.
Thanks, it's always been my dream to be compared to a 15 year old girl. The thing is that online networking has really changed how much access we have to players. It's like instead of waiting for an autograph now you collect friend request, something which I haven't done since whenever DeAngelo Willimas was drafted (2006).
__________________
"Hey baby, wake up from your a sleep." -Zlad

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 02:33 PM   #208
Playmaker
 
mlmdub130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 3,158
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
For those of you who want to judge Bradford in a pro offense, here you go...

Hulu - Tostitos Fiesta Bowl: Oklahoma vs. West Virginia
what a great game, white was a beast that day
__________________
"I don't think anybody should have regrets, especially me, ... You don't regret what you do in your life. If you do it, you do it for a reason."

ST21
mlmdub130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 03:05 PM   #209
Franchise Player
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,592
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

Report: Rams Talk With Eagles About McNabb - Vinnie Iyer - The Trenches - Sporting News

Interesting I don't see the Rams making this trade and taking Bradford it will be one or the other.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 09:28 PM   #210
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 26
Posts: 15,993
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
Report: Rams Talk With Eagles About McNabb - Vinnie Iyer - The Trenches - Sporting News

Interesting I don't see the Rams making this trade and taking Bradford it will be one or the other.
Depends on the draft pick compensation. If they end up giving up this year's second rounder in the deal, I doubt they'll be spending both of their top 60 picks on QBs. Some guys might, Devaney will not.

You know what trade would be really interesting for both teams? No. 1 pick to Philly for the No. 24 pick, McNabb, and DE Victor Abiamiri. Rams would still be in position to pick a quarterback early in the draft and add another impact player, would get a mediocre defensive end to play opposite Long, and McNabb to be the starter there in 2010.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.39478 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25