![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #271 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,360
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 ^ And gold is going up all the time.
__________________ "Cautiously And Optimistically... Looking Forward To Change" |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #272 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Three Chopt Virginia Age: 35
Posts: 2,906
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 I wouldn't mind picking him either if we go to a 3-4. If we didn't need a whole new offensive line he and Taylor Mays would be my choice. Well at least right now.
__________________ A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
| | |
| | #273 |
| Pro Bowl ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,044
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 I mean the thing w/ Suh is it all depends whether he can dominate as NT in the 3-4 since we'll see it a fair bit. I sorta think back to last year w/ BJ Raji. Understandably injury held him back but in general he found it hard to adjust to the 3-4. Very hard to say if Suh would make an immediate impact. I also doubt Haslett would stay in a 4-3 base just because we got Suh. We got awesome dline play last year, especially when Griff was 100%. Coming up we had Jarmon coming into his own possibly at LDE and Alexander progressing as a rotation lineman. Haslett is forcing the 3-4 regardless of personnel is my feeling so again everything depends about Suh's ability in the 3-4.
__________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you. |
| | |
| | #274 | |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,614
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 Quote:
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force | |
| | |
| | #275 |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 37
Posts: 4,261
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 I don't know...I kind of prefer handing our pick card to the commissioner before he has even finished announcing the pick before ours. Who needs to use our allotted time to see if another team is interested in trading up. |
| | |
| | #276 |
| Swearinger ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Age: 34
Posts: 12,623
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 After releasing Griffin, I wouldn't really say we're "set" at DT. Montgomery and Golston aren't exactly studs by any means. If we're fully committed to a switch to a 3-4, we're going to need some flux with D-lineman. I wonder how Suh would be as a 3-4 DE? My gut is that he's best suited as a 4-3 DT.
__________________ Insert witty signature here |
| | |
| | #277 | |
| Pro Bowl ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,044
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 Quote:
__________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you. | |
| | |
| | #278 |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 37
Posts: 4,261
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 I think Suh would be a DE in the 3-4 as well and I like Williams too. Can we really afford to sign Williams and use a pick on a NT? |
| | |
| | #279 | |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,614
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 Quote:
I saw them during the combine on the NFLN, and the pundits were talking about these guys fitting well in the 3-4 at NT.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force | |
| | |
| | #280 | |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 37
Posts: 4,261
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 Quote:
If that is the case, then we should leave Williams alone, especially if we need to use a draft pick on the nose. I am hoping Monty steps up....finally. | |
| | |
| | #281 |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,614
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 Yeah but Monty has no 3-4 experience. These youngsters would learn from Williams. I'm getting more confidence in the FO to be able to make a good deal and not overpay someone like Williams.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force |
| | |
| | #282 |
| Pro Bowl ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,044
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 Jeez it would be fantastic if Monty could breakout as a dominant NT, but it would be downright irresponsible for our FO to gamble on it. Monty hasn't flashed jack squat and may not have the talent to be a legit NT anyway.
__________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you. |
| | |
| | #283 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,721
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 So what are the chances we trade jason campbell, I say this because you'd be surprised what teams are willing to give up draft pick wise to get a QB.
__________________ "Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
| | |
| | #284 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,721
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 So I was just watching Sam Bradford's Highlights and Clausen's highlights, and I got to say that all Sam throws are short passes, and mid passes, rarely to never did he go deep. Also part of the reason why he had so many yards passing is because his receivers would get twice the yards on a throw from Sam (if Sam threw the ball 7 yards the receivers would pick up 14yards for example). Clausen however, throws the ball all over the field. The farthest throw I saw him make and complete was a 55 yard ball, where as Bradfords farthest from what I saw was 40 yards. I'm sure people are saying hey throwing deep balls doesn't matter that much, but they do, especially in the NFL they sure as hell matter. Also in the NFL the corners know how to wrap up and take down receivers after the catch unlike Washington or Baylor for example from his highlight tape where Jauquin Igelisas or Ryan Broyles turns a 7 yard slant into a 65 yard TD. Clausen definitely seems like the NFL QB for sure, plus he didn't play with a good OL anyway so he's already fit for the skins. I'm very curious to see how far Sam can throw..
__________________ "Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
| | |
| | #285 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: May 2007 Location: Harrisburg, PA Age: 29
Posts: 2,714
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 Quote:
__________________ "I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |