![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #16 |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 36
Posts: 4,261
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 If Suh truly is the most dominant player in the draft, I think you take him. You can never have too many pass rushers. |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #17 |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,954
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 Except when you have no one to throw the ball.
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 But on a 3-4, where would Suh fit? As a DE? Do was have a d-line of Haynesworth at DE, maybe Montgomery (or Justin Banan from Baltimore) at NT, and Suh at DE?
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 Or if no one can throw the ball because they are flat on their asses due to the pudding of an offensive line.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 36
Posts: 4,261
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 I have no problem with Campbell starting, less comfortable if Brennan starts, but I would have a big problem with starting any College QB. There will also be some Free Agent QB's out there (although most sites say Campbell is the best FA QB) and mid to later round guys that could be drafted. I am not convinced that QB is a huge priority at this moment. |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,579
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 And I can truly say with confidence that between now and April 22nd, So many draft analysts will predict this guy definitely going here and that guy definitely not going there. Sam Bradford hasn't even had his pro day people/schefter. He could go out there and throw wobbly balls or not be able to make all the throws, or his shoulder may wear down in workouts, whatever, I don't know, what I'm saying is anything can happen, plus theres also a guy named Jimmy Clausen who could do way better than Bradford, and have the Rams going hey lets take him, also maybe the rams want people to think that their going to take Bradford at number 1, and get teams like us or the seahawks, browns, or bills going "Hey lets swap picks with them before its too late." By the way, if we were to get Bradford, have any of you thought that maybe thats a good thing from a different standpoint, the fact that he's part native american, and us being the Redskins, who go to court with Native Americans over the team name, wouldn't getting Bradford be like a resistance from us going to court away from the Native Americans for a while? Just a thought.
__________________ When in doubt, go with the SEC |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 Quote:
In reality, I don't see Suh falling past Tampa Bay though. Although, I wonder if any team would be willing to trade up to pick up Suh?
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force | |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,954
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 Quote:
If they get Suh they'll just be a less expensive version of us in terms of their record. I want options at the #4 pick but I can't fault the Rams for taking him if they do. Of course lets not forget the Rams were looking to possibly trade back with the Bucs so I guess Smootsmack is on to something here about elaborating on the possibility that Bradford will be their first pick, not first overall.
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President | |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Playmaker Join Date: May 2007 Location: Harrisburg, PA Age: 29
Posts: 2,714
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 I just want offensive help with our first pick.
__________________ "I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown |
| | |
| | #25 |
| What will Shanny do this offseason? Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,924
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 If the Rams take Bradford they would be like the the portland trailblazers pasing on Jordan for Sam Bowie. Then later pasing on Kevin Durant for Greg Oden. Suh is the closest player to Rev. White. This must be a smoke screen!
__________________ Let's win games now...PLEASE |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Waldorf, MD Age: 29
Posts: 12,512
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,954
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 The Rams, we're talking about the Rams. The team with two first round OT's. I mean I want us to take Bradford but right now we're talking about The Rams taking Bradford and why it makes sense.
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 Quote:
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 My bad, yeah they should take Bradford, makes sense for them.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 Unlike us though, they figure to be picking in the top five or six next year, so their big question should be whether or not Bradford is the best quarterback in the next two drafts. And the answer, at least in terms of underclassmen, is probably yes. I'm guessing Locker isn't going to post a 67% completion season out of nowhere. With that said, I'm not confident that he's actually a better pick for the Rams than is Jimmy Clausen. But without a doubt, the Rams should trade down if it's at all possible (it's not).
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |