![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #31 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford I will have to agree. I don't see anything wrong with this thread, if you don't like it or you don't want it around, then don't acknowledge it and it will go away. Yes, there are 20 other threads on here about it, but who in the hell wants to read through all of that crap? Anyway, I agree that Bradford isn't the answer for the Skins, he will be hurt very quickly if he gets the start. I also don't have any confidence in a QB that ran a spread offense in college. |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #32 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Queens, NYC Age: 43
Posts: 2,975
| Re: We should stay away from a QB with the number 4 pick Quote:
Well said, we need OL it's amazing to me how people screamed our OL sucked & are now screaming get a QB. Look at our draft record we haven't really addressed the OL in years. | |
| | |
| | #33 |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,593
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford Good points...Bradford may be a good QB, I just don't think he's right for the Skins at the moment. I'd rather have a LT that can start right away, instead of a top 5 QB that's going to sit on the bench. I'm ok with the Redskins taking Bradford if that's what Shanny/Allen think needs to happen. I wonder if they Bradford camp would be fine if we took Okung.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force |
| | |
| | #34 | |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,098
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford Quote:
I suggested the search function be used. I used the search for you. I stated why I thought you were mistaken on a couple of points, and the thread is still open isn't it? Truthfully, I don't have a problem with this thread but don't say you couldn't find any discussion on Bradford
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You | |
| | |
| | #35 | |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford Quote:
Smooty you were rude and disrespectful, wait that came out wrong I mean you were informative and helpful
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. | |
| | |
| | #36 |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford If there's anything the draft has proven with 100% certainty is that it's all a crap shoot. Especially when it comes to quarterbacks and wide receivers in the first round. If I'm the Skins, I take Okung and hope there's still some gem at QB in one of the later rounds. Your GM prowess isn't proven in the first and second rounds. It's proven, I would say, in rounds 3-7. Let's see what Allen and Co. really have. Play it safe, draft Okung and if Jason Campbell doesn't work out this year, at least you have a quality tackle going into his second year with the team. At least you have began the process of building a dominant offensive line. |
| | |
| | #37 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: BillysBurg, Va.
Posts: 489
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford holy crap |
| | |
| | #38 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Detroit area
Posts: 3,961
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford I was against getting Bradford on the account of his being on a powerful team that to me, with the exception of a couple of games, played clearly inferior opponents most of the year in a conference not known for defense. THat being said, one thing other than arm strength that I want in a franchise guy for the SKins is a guy with a brain. Bradford scored a 36 on his Wonderlic test. Clausen only scored 23, and Tebow a 22. I would like to see what Stull and Kafka scored on theirs as both of their schools(Pitt and Northwestern) usually have some of the highest academic standards for athletes around. |
| | |
| | #39 |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,098
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford I want CJ "Perfect 10" Spiller
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
| | |
| | #40 | |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #41 |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford |
| | |
| | #42 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Detroit area
Posts: 3,961
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford Quote:
I agree, I am warming on Bradford if we do in fact take him, But if I am GM our first two picks are OL. This is going to be a "buyers market" for QBs this draft. Over a dozen really good college QBs coming out. Stull, Crompton, Kafka, Brown, Locker, Snead, with many more that probably won't be drafted like Sheehan, and Elliot. WE can wait for a potential franchise QB I think, or even wait a year or two to see how Mallet develops at Arkansas. | |
| | |
| | #43 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Detroit area
Posts: 3,961
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford |
| | |
| | #44 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,673
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford |
| | |
| | #45 | |
| MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,363
| Re: We should stay away from Bradford Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |