This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford

SkinzWin · 01-08-2011, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

If I were the Redskins, I'd play every young guy I could, and try and lose every single game next year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mooby

Thank goodness you're not the Redskins.

Maybe skinsfan69 should change his name to something else. badskinsfan69. notarealskinsfan69. postterriblecommentsskinsfan69. :cheeky-sm

skinsfan57 · 01-09-2011, 11:37 AM

what kind of logic is that?

SBXVII · 01-09-2011, 03:27 PM

On another site someone mentioned that Mike and Mike had talked about a team drafting Luck anyway and being able to hold the rights to him even though he doesn't come out this year. It was bantered about that there might not be a NFL rule on doing that but others felt that either

A- the team who drafted him would lose his right next draft and he would be placed right back in for next yrs draft. or

B- Teams can't draft a player who has not declared because the NFL does not follow the NBA rules and basically the team would be throwing away a draft pick.

So my question to you all is:

Could Luck wait till after the draft then declare himself for the supplimental draft? and if he can would it change anything in regards to what teams can go after him?

I'm thinking he probably doesn't want to play for the Panthers knowing he owner is cheap or something and maybe worked out a deal with Harbaugh that he would declare after the draft. Why? Maybe it would be too much for the 49ers to give up to trade with the Panthers to go after him but in the supplimental draft the 49ers could offer whatever which would hurt them till the following draft anyway. In other words the 49ers could offer a 1st round pick.

Could this be a possibility? or would the Panthers still get first dibbs on him since they did so bad?

skinsfan57 · 01-14-2011, 10:43 AM

Luck already said that staying in school had nothing to do with being drafted by the panthers.

CultBrennan59 · 07-07-2011, 05:56 PM

Would you make your own Luck? - SportsNation - ESPN

Looks like I'm in the greater half of skins fans that want us to 'lose for luck'

Mattyk · 07-07-2011, 06:19 PM

Ridiculous.

skinster · 07-07-2011, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

Would you make your own Luck? - SportsNation - ESPN

Looks like I'm in the greater half of skins fans that want us to 'lose for luck'

trust me, its not the greater half, I've been ripped apart too many times on this site for daring to mention this outcome being positive.

Mattyk · 07-07-2011, 08:53 PM

I really hope we don't have to hear this junk all season. NFL teams don't tank seasons. It's just absurd.

mbedner3420 · 07-07-2011, 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk

I really hope we don't have to hear this junk all season. NFL teams don't tank seasons. It's just absurd.

I agree! People, stop acting like this is the NBA! This team should try their hardest and let the chips fall where they may.

GMScud · 07-07-2011, 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk

I really hope we don't have to hear this junk all season. NFL teams don't tank seasons. It's just absurd.

I absolutely agree. But if we're going to miss the playoffs (which I'd say is a strong possibility), I'd rather it be with a 2-14 or 3-13 record and the #1 overall pick to land Luck than 6-10 or 7-9 and end up in the 12-15 range. I'm not saying I want us to mail it in, nor do I think we or any other team would. But no playoffs is no playoffs. I'd prefer the #1 pick to be our consolation prize.

Ruhskins · 07-07-2011, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

Would you make your own Luck? - SportsNation - ESPN

Looks like I'm in the greater half of skins fans that want us to 'lose for luck'

Go root for an NBA team if you want to tank Cowboys fan.

SirClintonPortis · 07-08-2011, 03:54 AM

Players will not tank because they want either a roster spot, a payday, or both.
Coaches won't tank because their jobs are on the freaking line.
Only GMs can deliberately weaken their team to the point of suckage, and even then, tanking is INCREDIBLY DIFFICULT because the players and coaches will always want to win.

freddyg12 · 07-08-2011, 08:23 AM

IF we're going to talk about the presumed 2012 draft, let's not talk about tanking, let's talk about what Danny & Bruce have up their sleeve to land one of the QBs. It's way too early to talk about that, but come draft time next year I'm sure they will be on the phones looking into everything. I have confidence in Bruce Allen that he could pull off a crazy deal to move up if anybody can.

Alvin Walton · 07-08-2011, 08:38 AM

The "Suck to get Luck" strategy is for moonbats and fruitcakes.
Probably the same people that think Sept. 11 was an inside job.

CultBrennan59 · 07-08-2011, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMScud

I absolutely agree. But if we're going to miss the playoffs (which I'd say is a strong possibility), I'd rather it be with a 2-14 or 3-13 record and the #1 overall pick to land Luck than 6-10 or 7-9 and end up in the 12-15 range. I'm not saying I want us to mail it in, nor do I think we or any other team would. But no playoffs is no playoffs. I'd prefer the #1 pick to be our consolation prize.

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING ON THIS SITE.

Skin fans think that when I say tank the season they think I mean lose like the Lions of '08.

NO!

I'm saying we're not a playoff caliber team, so why finish 6-10 with a losing record and not getting a good player than a losing record with a great player.

This guy knows what I'm talking about!

01-09-2011, 11:37 AM	#62
skinsfan57 Camp Scrub Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Herndon,Virginia Posts: 81	Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford what kind of logic is that?

01-09-2011, 03:27 PM	#63
SBXVII Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia Posts: 7,498	Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford On another site someone mentioned that Mike and Mike had talked about a team drafting Luck anyway and being able to hold the rights to him even though he doesn't come out this year. It was bantered about that there might not be a NFL rule on doing that but others felt that either A- the team who drafted him would lose his right next draft and he would be placed right back in for next yrs draft. or B- Teams can't draft a player who has not declared because the NFL does not follow the NBA rules and basically the team would be throwing away a draft pick. So my question to you all is: Could Luck wait till after the draft then declare himself for the supplimental draft? and if he can would it change anything in regards to what teams can go after him? I'm thinking he probably doesn't want to play for the Panthers knowing he owner is cheap or something and maybe worked out a deal with Harbaugh that he would declare after the draft. Why? Maybe it would be too much for the 49ers to give up to trade with the Panthers to go after him but in the supplimental draft the 49ers could offer whatever which would hurt them till the following draft anyway. In other words the 49ers could offer a 1st round pick. Could this be a possibility? or would the Panthers still get first dibbs on him since they did so bad?

01-14-2011, 10:43 AM	#64
skinsfan57 Camp Scrub Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Herndon,Virginia Posts: 81	Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford Luck already said that staying in school had nothing to do with being drafted by the panthers.

07-07-2011, 05:56 PM	#65
CultBrennan59 Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 5,590	Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford Would you make your own Luck? - SportsNation - ESPN Looks like I'm in the greater half of skins fans that want us to 'lose for luck' __________________ When in doubt, go with the SEC

07-07-2011, 06:19 PM	#66
Mattyk ‎\m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40 Posts: 72,716	Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford Ridiculous. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

07-07-2011, 08:53 PM	#68
Mattyk ‎\m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40 Posts: 72,716	Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford I really hope we don't have to hear this junk all season. NFL teams don't tank seasons. It's just absurd. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

07-08-2011, 03:54 AM	#72
SirClintonPortis Pro Bowl Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 6,052	Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford Players will not tank because they want either a roster spot, a payday, or both. Coaches won't tank because their jobs are on the freaking line. Only GMs can deliberately weaken their team to the point of suckage, and even then, tanking is INCREDIBLY DIFFICULT because the players and coaches will always want to win. __________________ Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan.

07-08-2011, 08:23 AM	#73
freddyg12 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 4,540	Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford IF we're going to talk about the presumed 2012 draft, let's not talk about tanking, let's talk about what Danny & Bruce have up their sleeve to land one of the QBs. It's way too early to talk about that, but come draft time next year I'm sure they will be on the phones looking into everything. I have confidence in Bruce Allen that he could pull off a crazy deal to move up if anybody can.

07-08-2011, 08:38 AM	#74
Alvin Walton Playmaker Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Holland, Michigan Posts: 3,863	Re: This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford The "Suck to get Luck" strategy is for moonbats and fruitcakes. Probably the same people that think Sept. 11 was an inside job. __________________ REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 CHARTER MEMEBER OF THE DALLAS SWEEPERS CLUB

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

This Just In---Andrew Luck To Stay At Stanford

NFL Draft Central