![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #46 |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 1,217
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... I'd like to get Cameron Jordan @10 even if there is qb's available. He's ready to start as a 3-4 RE now. Phil Taylor (NT, Baylor) in the second round and then best available OLB, ILB, FS and CB to round out the draft. IMO, a defensive heavy draft this year to go with some good key young guys already on the roster (Jarmon, Barnes, Bryant, Carriker and Rob Jackson) and studs Landry and Orakpo is the best way to go. We obviously didn't have 3-4 personnel before we made the change and it cost the 2010 season.
__________________ Playing a kids game for a kings ransom. |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #47 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,560
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... Quote:
__________________ Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever... Draft winners, not stars. Hail to the Redskins Hail victory Braves on the warpath Block for RG3 | |
| | |
| | #48 | |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,568
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... Quote:
And to the other comment. I say if we don't get a QB in the first or second round this year, then don't bother getting one until next year, because after Newton Mallet Gabbert and Locker, the QB's in this years class suck. Yes even Andy the ginger Dalton isn't pro ready IMO, he's a backup in the NFL at best.
__________________ When in doubt, go with the SEC | |
| | |
| | #49 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... I'd take NT, a DE/LB, or RT, or C. Basically DL or OL it doesn't matter in which order so long as the team takes BPA at one of those needs. Then I'd take that "shitty" QB Dalton or the other "shitty" QB Ponder in the second round. Honestly it doesn't matter who we take at QB. The only QB to know the system well enough is Grossman. Even one of the best QB's couldn't understand the whole system in one offseason (McNabb) so I doubt whoever is brought in is going to start right away. The team might as well beef up the OL so no matter who is at QB they are not running for their life or getting it almost every play. |
| | |
| | #50 | |
| Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Originally Portsmouth, VA but now Ocala, FL
Posts: 207
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... Quote:
We dont need a RB cause i have trust in Torain/Davis/Williams. Especially Davis once he cleans up his Pass Protection. TE is set. I dont think ILB is a pressing need cuz Perry Riley looked leaps and bounds better than Rocky McIntosh in there. You just have to go BPA with all the spots we have to fill. I believe the Shanahans, if not in the 1st round, will trade back more than once. Follow me on Twitter @Mr_Redskins for the latest Redskins news and opinions.
__________________ If "The Future is Now" why would we use our #4 Pick on a QB who will spend the 1st year on the bench? | |
| | |
| | #51 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 1,217
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... Quote:
Your assessment of the QB and mine are the same. I'd rather have a season of Rexy (or a McNabb wanting to prove everyone wrong) over a Dalton or someone similar bumbling along. Isn't Beck a project?
__________________ Playing a kids game for a kings ransom. | |
| | |
| | #52 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,560
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... Quote:
__________________ Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever... Draft winners, not stars. Hail to the Redskins Hail victory Braves on the warpath Block for RG3 | |
| | |
| | #53 | |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,568
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... Quote:
But honestly, I wouldn't even take a DE with the 10th overall pick. I'd go for a CB WR or trading with NE getting some of there picks. This draft has a lot of great DL WRs and interior OLineman, which is what we need. So if we could I'd just get both of New England's first round picks I'd take like a Heyward and a Phil Taylor.
__________________ When in doubt, go with the SEC | |
| | |
| | #54 |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 1,217
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... Or even their own first and Carolina's second for the 10 spot. But who'd they want to trade up for? Picks 28, 33 and 41 should give us NT, DE and OLB that should all immediately start but I don't think the Pats have a desire to jump up to 10.
__________________ Playing a kids game for a kings ransom. |
| | |
| | #55 | |
| Mann Up HOF! ![]() Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 8,906
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... Quote:
Last year's draft was tilted towards the offense. I think this year's should be tilted towards defense.
__________________ Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder. | |
| | |
| | #56 | |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 33
Posts: 14,884
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... Quote:
Beck has started and shown what he can do. He's a backup at the highest, but if he needs to play, it won't be a disaster.
__________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster | |
| | |
| | #57 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Colorado
Posts: 373
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... Yea of course IF AJ Green is there i would snap him up. I would also like Miller to compliment Orakapo. In the later rounds we need to address kicker, lets try for nebraskas kicker who is the most accurate and college history and a free saftey if OJ isn't signing with us. No one has even scratched the surface of sean taylor's spot. |
| | |
| | #58 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 383
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... Based on his best plays it's apparent that Blaine Gabbert is better in the shotgun then being under center. However I do like his quick release and he has above average mobility. The one thing I noticed is his deep balls get there in a hurry, I wouldn't object at all to drafting this guy. YouTube - Missouri QB #11 Blaine Gabbert Highlights |
| | |
| | #59 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... Quote:
If you pro-rate his numbers during that 4 game stint over a season he would have numbers in the same realm as Mark Sanchez and Josh Freeman's rookie seasons. I'm not commenting to say that he's good or bad; just that we don't know and can't really say.
__________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole | |
| | |
| | #60 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,652
| Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10....... Jim Miller was commenting on Beck the other day on NFL Radio and he was actually pretty supportive of him and said he has all the tools you look for and is a smart guy. He also said whether he gets a shot and is able to put it all together remains to be seen. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |