Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


If We Do Not Select QB at #10.......

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2011, 10:23 PM   #76
The Starter
 
diehard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10.......

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinzWin View Post
^^bingo. Golf clap to the new guy. Welcome by the way. Can you get me a discount on a license plate renewal?? Or free personalized tags?!
D.C., Maryland, Virginia not Department of Motor Vehicles. Either way, that's funny.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.'
diehard is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-25-2011, 01:54 AM   #77
Registered User
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10.......

Lombardi's mock draft has us taking Akeem Ayers of UCLA..
I like him, he reminds me of a young adalius thomas, but I don't think we'd be smart enough to get him.
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2011, 10:57 AM   #78
Impact Rookie
 
Son Of Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 643
Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10.......

I'm warming to the thought of a pass rushing LB in the first and a Jake Locker in the second. But I don't think Locker will last past the late first.
__________________
RG3 or bust!!!!!!!!!!
Son Of Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2011, 11:12 AM   #79
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 85,869
Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10.......

I would love to see us grab a quality LB or DE at #10. We definitely need someone to help bring the heat along with Rak.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2011, 12:31 PM   #80
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10.......

I wouldn't be upset w/ a nose tackle/DE/LB. DE's seem a little hit or miss nowdays too. We've got so many areas of need, we just need to get the best guy available. We can't afford to miss on someone. This draft is so deep we should be able to pick up a great player at 10 or we if trade down there should be some talent in later rounds too.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2011, 12:49 PM   #81
Playmaker
 
SkinzWin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,746
Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10.......

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsk1 View Post
I wouldn't be upset w/ a nose tackle/DE/LB. DE's seem a little hit or miss nowdays too. We've got so many areas of need, we just need to get the best guy available. We can't afford to miss on someone. This draft is so deep we should be able to pick up a great player at 10 or we if trade down there should be some talent in later rounds too.
I agree except with taking a nose tackle at 10. We NEED a NT, but I think even with the kid from Baylor, he is not a #10 overall pick. As many others have said, and I agree, it is a deep draft and I don't think we can go wrong picking the BPA in one of our many areas of need. The last thing we want to do is start reaching.
__________________
Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever...

Draft winners, not stars.

Hail to the Redskins
Hail victory
Braves on the warpath
Block for RG3
SkinzWin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2011, 03:56 PM   #82
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,750
Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10.......

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinzWin View Post
I agree except with taking a nose tackle at 10. We NEED a NT, but I think even with the kid from Baylor, he is not a #10 overall pick. As many others have said, and I agree, it is a deep draft and I don't think we can go wrong picking the BPA in one of our many areas of need. The last thing we want to do is start reaching.
Exactly. That kid is just as likely to end up being the next Alan Branch as he is the next BJ Raji. Might be better off taking one of the kids in the second round that can either man the position at 6'1 315 or has the potential to add 20 or 30 pounds to his frame.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2011, 02:23 AM   #83
Registered User
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10.......

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
Exactly. That kid is just as likely to end up being the next Alan Branch as he is the next BJ Raji. Might be better off taking one of the kids in the second round that can either man the position at 6'1 315 or has the potential to add 20 or 30 pounds to his frame.
I think Jerrell Powe would be as good, if not better than Phil Taylor at the nose for us. Plus we could draft two NT's and play a defense like green bay, with their two NT's (pickett and raji) and a pass rusher/run stuffer DE in cullen jenkins. Imagine for a second, Powe at DE/NT, Anthony Bryant at NT, Carriker at DE. with a rotation of NT Sione Fua of Stanford and a Brandon Bair DE (oregon) in that rotation.

theres no such thing as having too many NT's..
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2011, 03:48 PM   #84
Special Teams
 
Terpfan76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cumberland, Md
Posts: 242
Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10.......

Robert Quinn please. I suspect however that after the combine, his stock may skyrocket.
Terpfan76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2011, 04:23 PM   #85
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,057
Re: If We Do Not Select QB at #10.......

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsk1 View Post
I wouldn't be upset w/ a nose tackle/DE/LB. DE's seem a little hit or miss nowdays too. We've got so many areas of need, we just need to get the best guy available. We can't afford to miss on someone. This draft is so deep we should be able to pick up a great player at 10 or we if trade down there should be some talent in later rounds too.
I could not agree more, which is why I am against getting these QB's with #10. These three top Qb's are not ready to play in the NFL unless he is exceptional and they go to a really good team with a strong defense and offensive line and running game. We have neither.
On the trading down part, we have tried to trade down every year for the last four or five and there were no takers. In a deep draft like this one, everyone is looking to trade down for more picks. Very unlikely we trade down.
Lets get solid day 1 starters that will play for 10 years. No projects or guys with questionable past or injuries. This draft is deep, we can get a stud starter at #10.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.21975 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25