Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


Mark Ingram at #10?

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2011, 09:59 PM   #31
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,080
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinzWin View Post
LOL... That was my "playful ribbing" line I could have said this thread sounds like it'd be started by Ace...
I was just tossing it out there to discuss... Not much else going on right now
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-29-2011, 10:34 AM   #32
Special Teams
 
BuckSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Eastern Ohio
Age: 45
Posts: 232
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BuckSkin View Post
I think Ingram is a definite talent, and I would enjoy anointing him the heir to Portis. freddyg12 is right though... he is not a once a decade back. There were several experts that even questioned if he was even the best back at Georgia this past season. So.... to answer the original question of this thread, regrettably "no".
WOW! I'm amazed that no one slammed me on that one. I know that Ingram played at Alabama. Some said he may not even be the best back for 'Bama. I'll accept "dumb a$$" of the day.
__________________
"Any Nation willing to give up a little freedom, to gain a little security, will deserve neither, and lose both."
-Benjamin Franklin
BuckSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2011, 12:31 PM   #33
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 25
Posts: 11,921
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BuckSkin View Post
I think Ingram is a definite talent, and I would enjoy anointing him the heir to Portis. freddyg12 is right though... he is not a once a decade back. There were several experts that even questioned if he was even the best back at Georgia this past season. So.... to answer the original question of this thread, regrettably "no".
Ummmmmmmmm. Ingram didn't go to UGA.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2011, 12:35 PM   #34
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,104
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
Ummmmmmmmm. Ingram didn't go to UGA.

HEY! It's all da same down herrrr in da souf budi
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2011, 07:59 PM   #35
Playmaker
 
SkinzWin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,693
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I was just tossing it out there to discuss... Not much else going on right now
Duly noted. Anyone think any of these rumors are famous Shanny smoke screens? I hear tell people saying something about Gabbert being taken #2, any credence to that anyone may know of?
__________________
Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever...

Draft winners, not stars.

Hail to the Redskins
Hail victory
Braves on the warpath
Block for RG3
SkinzWin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2011, 08:07 PM   #36
The Starter
 
NM Redskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,009
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

Wouldn't want him at 10, but if we could manage a trade with say NE and get their second, I wouldn't mind taking him at 17, and use that second rounder on P Taylor and our 2nd on a QB T Taylor.
__________________
Despite my solid 40 time and great intangibles I went undrafted AGAIN!
NM Redskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 08:07 AM   #37
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NM Redskin View Post
Wouldn't want him at 10, but if we could manage a trade with say NE and get their second, I wouldn't mind taking him at 17, and use that second rounder on P Taylor and our 2nd on a QB T Taylor.
Tyrod? I'm a Hokie (& a VCU Ram, just had to get that in!) but no way is he worth a 2nd round pick.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 09:20 AM   #38
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,104
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44ever View Post
Hope our #10 can stop this guy, If he lands on the Giants, we will regret not picking him up. I would love to see this guy in B/G
YouTube - Mark Ingram(#22)- Official 2009 Heisman Highlights



I would also but not at 10, we have too many glaring needs
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2011, 09:27 AM   #39
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

I'm w/ you Matty, we have too many other pressing needs. I will say it would be tempting if Ingram is there. I think he's going to be a good one.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 09:35 AM   #40
The Starter
 
Redskin Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,479
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

First I would like to say I'm a Crimson Tide I would Ingram or Julio. This is probably a smokescreen to lay out trade bait to move back smart tho. If you notice 95% of mock drafts have Ingram going to Miami @ 15 (I think) maybe we get them to bite
__________________
WIN, LOSE OR DRAW I'M A DIE-HARD REDSKIN FAN!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
First they ban winning...now this?
Redskin Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2011, 09:36 PM   #41
The Starter
 
budw38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,386
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

Take the best player , this April ( if we do that for the next few years ) ,we could build something to be proud of for the long hall .... HAIL SKINS !!
budw38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2011, 10:11 AM   #42
Playmaker
 
mlmpetert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,257
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

So ill chime in and give my 2cents. I got 2 main problems with this. Like most everyone else I think we got way too many needs to pick a running back over other positions, particularly that high in the draft. Which leads me to my bigger issue.

I don’t think you ever draft a running back that high, ever….. First I think rb is truly a position where its easier to find a late gem than any other position, and to go along with that I think we have one of the best rb evaluators ever in Mike Shanahan. Secondly I think the difference in talent from a first round pick to a mid round pick to a late round pick for running backs is not all that significant. Adrian Peterson is damn good, but he’s got his quirks and overall hes not significantly better than any other top 10 back in the league, most of which arnt top 10 picks nor 1st round picks. And lastly rb’s normally have a shortly “self life” then most other position. To contrast with that they also seem to have a shorter learning curve so they seem to be able to step in from almost day one have the potential make a impact right away. So since, in my opinion, this team aint a season away from being 1 dynamic player short from being a championship caliber team it would be foolish to “waste” a pick on a dynamic running back that likely will be slowing down by the time the Redskins are ready to routinely go deep in the playoffs.
__________________
mlmpetert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 07:47 AM   #43
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,080
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

Report: Bad knee eliminates Mark Ingram from two draft boards | ProFootballTalk
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 08:07 AM   #44
The Starter
 
SolidSnake84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 1,861
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

I'm a huge Tide fan, and i can tell you Ingram has the same condition that Da'Quan Bowers has.

Basically his knee is a ticking time bomb, and everytime he steps on the field, he is in tremendous pain and only his toughness and his spirit is what keeps him playing.

Da'Quan Bowers career will be over the next time he goes in for surgery. The long term goal is obviously not playing football, but being young and living a pain free life, with no handicaps. I have been told by more than one person that the type of knee conditions these men have, they will be lucky to play 2 seasons at best. Bowers is in a much worse way.

Just look up Reggie Williams knee on google, to see what happens if these guys try to keep playing with what should be a career-ending injury.
__________________
Time to nut up or shut up
SolidSnake84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 10:00 AM   #45
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Mark Ingram at #10?

NO!, QB, OL, or DL. With this in mind I'd almost say OL, or DL because we need an OL to protect whoever is QB and we need a NT or LB/DE for creating a better pass rush.

Report: Bad knee eliminates Mark Ingram from two draft boards | ProFootballTalk

Quote:
But there have been rumors that the long-term stability of Ingram’s knee is tenuous. And NFL Network’s Mike Lombardi reported something that may substantiate that speculation on Wednesday evening’s Path to the Draft.

“I’ve had two teams tell me the knee is very bad,” said Lombardi. “He won’t be on their boards. These are teams that need running backs.”
No thank you. MS is known for getting really good quality out of mid to late round RB's, so I'll stick with that plan.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.40855 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25