![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #46 |
| Banned Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 299
| Re: Would you be ok with... |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #47 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Staunton, VA
Posts: 957
| Re: Would you be ok with... I would like it if the Skins would not draft a qb and trade down for more, much needed picks but I am not holding my breath.
__________________ F#$% the Cowpukes! |
| | |
| | #48 |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: IOWA Age: 30
Posts: 1,282
| Re: Would you be ok with... I thought it had been established you cannot trade future picks due to the CBA and lockout.
__________________ No pressure, no diamonds. |
| | |
| | #49 |
| The Starter Join Date: Jan 2006 Age: 24
Posts: 1,035
| Re: Would you be ok with... I tend to agree, Mallet is the most plug and play ready out of all the QB's in this draft as long as you can protect him.
__________________ doing it all in the spirit of the salary cap! |
| | |
| | #50 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Age: 42
Posts: 4,529
| Re: Would you be ok with... Current players for picks, no. Players you draft, no. Current and future picks, yes.
__________________ No Pressure-No Diamonds! Go Catch Your Dreams! |
| | |
| | #51 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
| Re: Would you be ok with... Quote:
I think that notion that 2nd round picks can't be successful is far more anecdotal then meaningful.
__________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole | |
| | |
| | #52 |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,957
| Re: Would you be ok with... I remember the Sugar Bowl.
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President |
| | |
| | #53 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Norman, OK Age: 26
Posts: 12,994
| Re: Would you be ok with... Mallett is the most ready to play QB right now, I still think JL will be the Star of the group
__________________ Robert Griffin III "if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker |
| | |
| | #54 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Age: 42
Posts: 4,529
| Re: Would you be ok with... Locker has just got Heath Shuler written ALL over him. Mobile, inaccurate, low football IQ. Can't see him all of the sudden becoming a great QB when he never was before.
__________________ No Pressure-No Diamonds! Go Catch Your Dreams! |
| | |
| | #55 | |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,957
| Re: Would you be ok with... Quote:
On the other hand you could say that his pro style system has failed to prepare any QB for the NFL level, his decision making is suspect, and he doesn't have the mobility to escape the rush. He'll have to sit for a year or two if for no other reason then to know where everyone is so his inability to avoid the rush doesn't become a liability. QB's that are NFL ready usually have some sort of mobility or pocket presence that allows them to buy extra time as they learn to read NFL defenses. Matt Ryan, Big Ben, Flacco, Marino, and Freeman all had at the very least decent mobility. And yes Flacco and Ryan both have decent mobility. Mallet has minimal. Short of being protected by the Jets line he'll be a major liability his first year. In my mind he's a project. Personally, for better or worse, I feel that Mike Vick is a better comparison.
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President | |
| | |
| | #56 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Norman, OK Age: 26
Posts: 12,994
| Re: Would you be ok with... Yeah but Locker is twice the athlete and has a great arm. Hey I agree he's not a guy ready to play until 2012 OR 13 but he's got a huge upside
__________________ Robert Griffin III "if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker |
| | |
| | #57 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Age: 42
Posts: 4,529
| Re: Would you be ok with... Even with that, I'm still not sold. If we draft him, I vigorously hope that I am wrong.
__________________ No Pressure-No Diamonds! Go Catch Your Dreams! |
| | |
| | #58 |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,957
| Re: Would you be ok with... If the lockout, or the current appeal, causes post draft minicamps and OTA's to be canceled and cuts into training camp time then no rookie QB should play this year until at least week 14. Maybe Newton if he goes number 1 but even then they should have a very simple run heavy system in place for him.
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President |
| | |
| | #59 |
| Mann Up HOF! ![]() Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 8,906
| Re: Would you be ok with... I would argue that Shuler also was a great athlete and had a great arm. Those two qualities alone do not make for NFL success, as Shuler sadly showed.
__________________ Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder. |
| | |
| | #60 |
| The Starter Join Date: Jan 2006 Age: 24
Posts: 1,035
| Re: Would you be ok with... Locker also doesn't seem like someone that'll get butt-hurt if things aren't going as planned. He leaves it all on the field because he loves the game.
__________________ doing it all in the spirit of the salary cap! |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |