Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


2nd round mock

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-29-2011, 12:30 PM   #1
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 81,085
2nd round mock

PFT’s second-round mock draft | ProFootballTalk
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-29-2011, 12:36 PM   #2
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 15,799
Re: 2nd round mock

Terrible mock. I don't see the Bengals taking a QB. I just can't see us taking Smith either, as much as I like him.
__________________
R.I.P. #21

New words created on The Warpath:
Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory
Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota
Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual
Stroried

"Give an opinion and move on. Your life doesn't depend on winning the internet." -FRPLG
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 12:37 PM   #3
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: 2nd round mock

That is two HORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRIBLE picks for us.

I should have expected garbage picks from PFT though.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 12:39 PM   #4
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 43
Posts: 2,656
Re: 2nd round mock

Torrey Smith or any WR at #41 would be assinine IMO. Would rather draft Paea at #41. Would be happy with Mallett at #49...that seems like a good risk/reward spot for him. I don't see him lasting that long though.
__________________
Section 115 Row 23

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

http://victorybeer.com/
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 12:39 PM   #5
Franchise Player
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,634
Re: 2nd round mock

PFT must think Vinny is still drafting for us!
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 02:37 PM   #6
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: 2nd round mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I just don't see us going Torrey Smith. Although we need WR help, we've got the some small fast WR's...Banks, Austin, Armstrong. Not saying we won't go w/ Hankerson or Little at some point, but who knows.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 02:59 PM   #7
Special Teams
 
Terpfan76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cumberland, Md
Posts: 239
Re: 2nd round mock

Torrey Smith is 6'1" 200lbs and has a 41" vertical, I'd hardly consider him a small, fast receiver.
Terpfan76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 03:05 PM   #8
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,104
Re: 2nd round mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terpfan76 View Post
Torrey Smith is 6'1" 200lbs and has a 41" vertical, I'd hardly consider him a small, fast receiver.
I was just gonna say the same thing
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 04:10 PM   #9
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 29
Posts: 14,505
Re: 2nd round mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terpfan76 View Post
Torrey Smith is 6'1" 200lbs and has a 41" vertical, I'd hardly consider him a small, fast receiver.
Classic looks like Tarzan plays like Jane player from Maryland. He's basically a bigger version of Ted Ginn Jr. Great physical tools but only ran 4 routes in college. If we MUST go Receiver I would rather go Hankerson, Cobb, Little, or Young.

Still I have absolute contempt for Receivers. Guys who if you're lucky are only involved in 7 or 8 plays a game. Compare that to lineman who are involved in at least 30 to 40 plays a game, and QB's who handle the ball on 99% of offensive snaps that aren't punts and field goals.
__________________
6.67×10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 04:21 PM   #10
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 43
Posts: 2,656
Re: 2nd round mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag59 View Post
Classic looks like Tarzan plays like Jane player from Maryland. He's basically a bigger version of Ted Ginn Jr. Great physical tools but only ran 4 routes in college. If we MUST go Receiver I would rather go Hankerson, Cobb, Little, or Young.

Still I have absolute contempt for Receivers. Guys who if you're lucky are only involved in 7 or 8 plays a game. Compare that to lineman who are involved in at least 30 to 40 plays a game, and QB's who handle the ball on 99% of offensive snaps that aren't punts and field goals.
Completely agree! WR is a luxury pick for a team trying to rebuild. I might take one tomorrow but i wouldn't do it tonight. Focus on QB and line play. I would even draft a RB before I took a WR since a good RB can handle the ball 15 to 20 times in a game.
__________________
Section 115 Row 23

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

http://victorybeer.com/
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 04:27 PM   #11
Mann Up HOF!
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 10,504
Re: 2nd round mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32 View Post
Completely agree! WR is a luxury pick for a team trying to rebuild. I might take one tomorrow but i wouldn't do it tonight. Focus on QB and line play. I would even draft a RB before I took a WR since a good RB can handle the ball 15 to 20 times in a game.
I'm with you guys.

This perspective makes Atlanta's trade seem even sillier. They gave up the farm for a guy who might have 7 touches a game.
__________________
Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 04:42 PM   #12
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,847
Re: 2nd round mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32 View Post
Completely agree! WR is a luxury pick for a team trying to rebuild. I might take one tomorrow but i wouldn't do it tonight. Focus on QB and line play. I would even draft a RB before I took a WR since a good RB can handle the ball 15 to 20 times in a game.
Agree! Although I would say linemen, then QB then CB then RB then WR.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 04:55 PM   #13
Impact Rookie
 
Redskin Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Orleans, LA- via VA
Age: 36
Posts: 635
Re: 2nd round mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32 View Post
Completely agree! WR is a luxury pick for a team trying to rebuild. I might take one tomorrow but i wouldn't do it tonight. Focus on QB and line play. I would even draft a RB before I took a WR since a good RB can handle the ball 15 to 20 times in a game.
We need to take best NT, C, or QB with these picks. I'd love to steal a late rounder like Blackmon WR from Ok St, or his teammate Kendall Hunter RB.
It would be huge if we can make that happen.
__________________
Hail to The REDSKINS
Redskin Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 05:00 PM   #14
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 43
Posts: 2,656
Re: 2nd round mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
Agree! Although I would say linemen, then QB then CB then RB then WR.
Well in general I think QB is most important but as far as tonight goes I think we missed all the QB's that would have excited me so I would just as soon pass on the rest and try and fill some other holes with some big bodies.

And if there's any truth to the Raiders dangling their 2012 1st rounder then I am all over that. I would give them #41 straight up for that pick. That's an Andrew Luck lottery ball!
__________________
Section 115 Row 23

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

http://victorybeer.com/
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 05:05 PM   #15
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,626
Re: 2nd round mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32 View Post
Well in general I think QB is most important but as far as tonight goes I think we missed all the QB's that would have excited me so I would just as soon pass on the rest and try and fill some other holes with some big bodies.

And if there's any truth to the Raiders dangling their 2012 1st rounder then I am all over that. I would give them #41 straight up for that pick. That's an Andrew Luck lottery ball!
I'm with you on this. Though I'd take a flyer on a QB in the 4th (if we have a pick there) or 5th round this year. I've been saying we need two new QBs for a while. A young starter and a young backup.

Personally, I don't think the trade with the Raiders will happen. But they're definitely talking. Apparently, we're talking with the Niners as well. But I think everyone is, so that's not a big deal
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.27723 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25