Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


Official Andrew Luck Thread

NFL Draft Central


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2011, 03:54 PM   #31
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,616
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

I agree that about Moore and Foles. My guess is Tanneyhill would mean they have confidence in Beck for the next two to three years. Good for them, I suppose. I'd be down for going to right Moore to kick off the 2012 season
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  

Advertisements
Old 10-28-2011, 11:02 PM   #32
Impact Rookie
 
sdskinsfan2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 31
Posts: 811
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
That's terrible.
I believe the correct spelling is That's Turrribbbble.
sdskinsfan2001 is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 04:38 AM   #33
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,132
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

We won't suck enough to get Luck and forget about trading to get him. I don't won to mortage the farm to get Luck. As for Kellen Moore from Boise St. he looks great in the college game but he does not play in a strong conference. He is also on the short side for a NFL QB. We have to get a QB in the 2012 draft and I'm not talking about a backup QB we need a bona fide starter. We better do our home work for this draft on the QB's.
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam FlowersRedskins Fan Since 1972
skins89moss is offline  
Old 10-29-2011, 09:46 AM   #34
Registered User
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

I really can't believe we have another thread on this guy.

Personally I think he's over rated. There will be other teams who will finish worse then the Skins who will have a better chance of getting him. and lastly... I think he did want to come out last year but knew his ole ball coach would not be able to get him in San Fran so he decided to stay in college. I'd put good money (if I had it) on the table that he comes out this year and San Fran makes a play for him. A big play. I think if San Fran can't move up to get him then they will offer whoever picks him a couple of players and a couple of picks just to trade for him.

So to me .... Luck is a moot issue. Who's the next best? of course that would fit in this system.
SBXVII is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 12:15 AM   #35
Pro Bowl
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 7,359
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

Anybody watch the game tonight? What a game!! Both QB's looked great especially Luck, Barkley held his own.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 08:37 AM   #36
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Age: 28
Posts: 4,439
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

tannehill is a good shout. hes big and mobile (he was a wide receiver at tamu too)
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs

Last edited by Big C; 10-30-2011 at 08:41 AM.
Big C is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 09:22 AM   #37
Mann Up HOF!
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 10,446
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C View Post
tannehill is a good shout. hes big and mobile (he was a wide receiver at tamu too)
Yeah, there's a lot to like about Tannehill. Lack of experience is a concern. But I wouldn't mind if we got him in a later round.
__________________
Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.
Lotus is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 12:42 PM   #38
Mann Up HOF!
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 10,446
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
Drafting Tannehill would set us back 5 years.
Why?
__________________
Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.
Lotus is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 02:37 PM   #39
Registered User
 
Landry44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 299
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

Andrew Luck is an incredible qb. However, he's not the only great qb in this draft. I think it's 6 guys that's could be drafted in the first round. You have Landry Jones, Matt Barkley, RG3, Nick Foles, and Ryan Tannehill. Now I'm not sold all of these guys but I would much rather draft one of them before I trade away this draft and the next for Luck.

1) Landry Jones has great size, accuracy, good arm strength, and decent mobility. He's a really good qb. I think he would fit in well here like most of the qbs in this draft. My only problem with Jones is that he's inconsistent at times.

2) Matt Barkley isn't great at anything but he's solid at everything. He has average size, good arm strength, good accuracy, good decision making, and good mobility. When I look at this kid play I see a guy who can consistently make all of the throws. He will be a good qb at he next level in my opinion. I think he's a better fit for our offense than Landry Jones, but not as good as RG3 or Tannehill.

3)RG3 is the truth. I really, really do like this kid. He has average size, great accuracy, good arm strength, great decision making, and great mobility. I think that this kid is one of the best players in this draft. Out of all the qbs he fits our system better than any of them. His team has been overwhelmed this year at times, but he still performs at a high level. Even yesterday he team was completely outmatched on both sides of the ball and he stilll manage to pass over four hundred yards while completing 66% of his passes. It wasn't a great day but any means but it showed just how good of a passer he is. When he gets in the nfl and gets it. This kid is a probowl qb. I just don't think he's ready to start right away. He needs a year to really learn the our system.

4) Nick Foles is guy I like a lot. He has great size, great accuracy, good arm strength, and decent mobility. He's shown the ability to carry his team on his back. He would be a good pick for us at qb. The only thing is he will not be ready to start day one.

5) Ryan Tannehill is a interesting guy. I'm not sold on him like the first 4 prospects, but I think this guy has a lot of physical tools. I think he's good size, good accuracy, great mobility, and good decision making. I don't want us to draft him but he is very talented. He would fit in here because of his mobility and accuracy. I just think it's better options in this draft.

6) I really do like Kellen Moore. He's accuracy, smart, and a true leader. If he was a few inches taller and had a little more arm strength he would be a top 5 pick. This guy is an amazing player. I hope he gets a shot somewhere. I wouldn't be against the SKins drafting him as long as it's in the mid rounds.

In my opinion there are a lot of great options for us at qb. There is no reason for us to give up everything for Andrew Luck when we got like 5 guys that could come in and light it up in our offense. We have multiple needs on both the defense and offensive side of the ball. If we don't get the number one pick I would say Luck is out of the question. I would love to have him, but not at the price that it's going to take to get him.
Landry44 is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 02:40 PM   #40
Special Teams
 
musicmaster45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 373
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

I haven't sen tannehill. Moore and RGIII are good for us though because they are so consistently good and accurate. They both understand the game well and use that to their advantage. Hope we pick them up.
__________________
Shanahann loves the colleges i do...... Purdue and Nebraska FTW!!!!
musicmaster45 is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 02:41 PM   #41
Registered User
 
Landry44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 299
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Yeah, there's a lot to like about Tannehill. Lack of experience is a concern. But I wouldn't mind if we got him in a later round.
There is a lot to like about him. I'm just not sold on him. I would much rather draft Kellen Moore before I draft Tannehill.
Landry44 is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 02:56 PM   #42
Registered User
 
Landry44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 299
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by musicmaster45 View Post
I haven't sen tannehill. Moore and RGIII are good for us though because they are so consistently good and accurate. They both understand the game well and use that to their advantage. Hope we pick them up.
Tannehill is talented but I think he's to much of risk. RG3 has been amazing this season even in losses. If we draft a guy in the first round I hope it's RG3. I feel bad for Kellen Moore because I believe he is really one of the best qbs in this draft. His size and arm strength will keep him from being a first round pick. If we can draft both of them I would all for it.
Landry44 is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 06:26 PM   #43
The Starter
 
Mechanix544's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,273
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

we might be able to get moore in the 4th or 5th if he drops
__________________
Ain't Nothin Like a Good B Western.

YEEHAW
Mechanix544 is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 06:28 PM   #44
The Starter
 
Mechanix544's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,273
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Landry44 View Post
There is a lot to like about him. I'm just not sold on him. I would much rather draft Kellen Moore before I draft Tannehill.
this, definitley
__________________
Ain't Nothin Like a Good B Western.

YEEHAW
Mechanix544 is offline  
Old 10-30-2011, 08:09 PM   #45
Impact Rookie
 
sdskinsfan2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 31
Posts: 811
Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread

If Luck, Barkley, Foles or RGIII are available when we pick in the 1st round I want the Skins to pick one of them.

If that doesnt happen then if Jones, Tannehill, or Moore are available in the 2nd round I want the Skins to pick one of them

I cant watch Beck or Grossman any longer, they both need to be gone next year. Let the Rookie QB and Crompton be # 1 and # 2 next season in either order.
sdskinsfan2001 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.27143 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25