![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #211 |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,097
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) I mentioned this before I think, we had Foles (along with Barkley and a few others) on the ESPN campus a year or two ago and they did all these drills on our football field. Foles was outstanding. But the QB he is on game day doesn't seem to be that same guy
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
| |
| Advertisements |
| | #212 |
| The Starter Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: MD Eastern Shore
Posts: 1,297
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) I don't understand why you said that. Is it based on something you know from out of Redskins Park? |
| |
| | #213 |
| Naega jeil jal naga ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 27
Posts: 13,953
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) Well it's not unusual for Smoot to get info from Ashburn but at the very least his style of play makes him an obvious candidate. Plus if he bust we can use him as a receiver.
__________________ Flacco is 1337 Fanclub President |
| |
| | #214 | |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,097
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) Quote:
Definite interest in Luck, but not likely possible Kinda so so on Barkley Intrigued by RG III, spending a lot of time at his games Comfortable with Landry Jones Love Ryan Tannehill
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You | |
| |
| | #215 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: MD Eastern Shore
Posts: 1,297
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) Quote:
| |
| |
| | #216 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,571
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) Again smootsmack, the people where you get your information from, about how often % wise, do they tell you a skins rumor and it is actually correct?
__________________ When in doubt, go with the SEC |
| |
| | #217 | |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,097
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) Quote:
But anyway, I think most people here would tell you my info is generally pretty legit: I have "broken" a lot of stuff here. By the same token, I've been wrong. Whether it's because the info I got was wrong, or circumstances changed things. I'm not 100% accurate, even the best aren't That said, with Allen and Shanahan it is much much harder to figure their plans out than previous regimes
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You | |
| |
| | #218 | |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) Quote:
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. | |
| |
| | #219 |
| Gamebreaker ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34
Posts: 14,592
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) I doubt Barkley and RGIII would be on the board when it is our turn to pick. That being said, I'd hate to have a top pick QB not work out b/c he doesn't fit Shanny's system.
__________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force |
| |
| | #220 |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) In that case, then I would be fine but I wouldn't wanna pass on them for Tannenhill.
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. |
| |
| | #221 |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) Smoot any word on who we would draft if we don't go QB in the 1st rd.
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. |
| |
| | #222 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,560
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) Why wouldn't they? Obviously Colts will go #1 overall with Luck. You have Miami that is playing well and could be ahead of us, but not necessarily. They definitely need a QB. Seattle needs ones, but I doubt they will be ahead of us. That would leave either RGIII or Barkley for us at the 5-7 spot IMO.
__________________ Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever... Draft winners, not stars. Hail to the Redskins Hail victory Braves on the warpath Block for RG3 |
| |
| | #223 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Norman, OK Age: 26
Posts: 12,980
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) I want luck Idc what we have to do to get to 1st. I'd trade next years 1st and 2nd if we had to. If not I want RG3
__________________ Robert Griffin III "if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker |
| |
| | #224 |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) I would not give that up, IMO Barkley will be just as good as Luck. Luck is just more athletic. I say stay where we end up. If Barkley or RGIII falls to us pull the trigger, if not, Mo Claiborne or Trent Richardson would look good in a Skins jersey.
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. |
| |
| | #225 |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,097
| Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2) Not really. Burfict seems to be a name commonly mentioned. And the dude from Stanford. The lineman
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |