The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   The Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central
Reload this Page 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read


2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)

NFL Draft Central


Closed Thread
Page 35 of 45 « First 253334 35 3637 Last »
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2011, 10:40 PM   #511
The Starter
 
T.O.Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 1,937
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
I thought there was a recent quote saying he wasn't even close to a decision. Why so concerned about kalil? Worried Barkley stays too?
Supposedly, there decision is linked.
T.O.Killa is offline  

Advertisements
Old 12-11-2011, 10:41 PM   #512
Pro Bowl
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 6,501
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
Did anyone ever confirm that Mat Kalil is staying at USC?
Source: OT Matt Kalil "set to return" to USC - CBSSports.com
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.

Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline  
Old 12-11-2011, 10:42 PM   #513
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,545
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Technically they can't do anything more than watch his games since he's not a senior and hasn't declared so the scouting of him is limited.

And Kalil hasn't made any decision yet
Ah gotchya. Still though, they don't send scouts to the games?
mbedner3420 is offline  
Old 12-11-2011, 10:43 PM   #514
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,545
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN View Post
That was apparently a false report...
mbedner3420 is offline  
Old 12-11-2011, 10:45 PM   #515
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,545
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
Supposedly, there decision is linked.
I thought I heard something about that. Didn't realize it was a definite.
mbedner3420 is offline  
Old 12-11-2011, 11:12 PM   #516
Mad Men
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,097
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
Ah gotchya. Still though, they don't send scouts to the games?
I'm sure they do. But that's only a small portion of the scouting process
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 12-11-2011, 11:31 PM   #517
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,545
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Really interesting article about the redskins scouting staff and the delegation of power, for anyone interested in a good read.

http://http://www.washingtonpost.com...alO_story.html
Last edited by mbedner3420; 12-11-2011 at 11:35 PM.
mbedner3420 is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 01:10 AM   #518
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,020
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
I still don't think it'll be either of those guys. I think the name you're going to hear a lot of next April in connection with the Skins is Tannehill
Why?
__________________
Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you.
The Goat is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 05:54 AM   #519
Mad Men
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Why?
Why would they pick him or why do I think it'll be him?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 10:22 AM   #520
Franchise Player
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,944
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Only a matter of time.

__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 12:06 PM   #521
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,020
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Why would they pick him or why do I think it'll be him?
Both. Assuming we pick in the 4 to 7 range and one of Luck, Barkley or RGIII is available why take a project QB?
__________________
Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you.
The Goat is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 12:18 PM   #522
Mad Men
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,097
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Both. Assuming we pick in the 4 to 7 range and one of Luck, Barkley or RGIII is available why take a project QB?
Well let's take Luck off. Now it's just Barkley or RGIII.

Here are the various reasons for my thinking. Tannehill, contrary to popular belief, wasn't a WR converted to QB. He was a QB coming into A&M, who played some WR before starting at QB. I think the combine and workouts will increase RT's value (and may drop RGIIIs a bit actually). Tannehill is a more unlikely choice, which fits a bit of the Mike Shanahan mold. Plus there is the Mike Sherman-Kyle Shanahan connection from their days with the Texans. And I also have a feeling still that our first first round pick won't be a QB.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 12:27 PM   #523
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,020
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Well let's take Luck off. Now it's just Barkley or RGIII.

Here are the various reasons for my thinking. Tannehill, contrary to popular belief, wasn't a WR converted to QB. He was a QB coming into A&M, who played some WR before starting at QB. I think the combine and workouts will increase RT's value (and may drop RGIIIs a bit actually). Tannehill is a more unlikely choice, which fits a bit of the Mike Shanahan mold. Plus there is the Mike Sherman-Kyle Shanahan connection from their days with the Texans. And I also have a feeling still that our first first round pick won't be a QB.


Something you've said a couple/few times now. Have no idea what to say except I hope you're wrong on this one.

...actually, I'd say not drafting the best QB w/ our first pick would reflect Mike's supreme arrogance and ego. The fact there's even a chance of this happening (which I acknowledge) should be enough reason to bring in a new regime.
__________________
Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you.
The Goat is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 12:28 PM   #524
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,545
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Well let's take Luck off. Now it's just Barkley or RGIII.

Here are the various reasons for my thinking. Tannehill, contrary to popular belief, wasn't a WR converted to QB. He was a QB coming into A&M, who played some WR before starting at QB. I think the combine and workouts will increase RT's value (and may drop RGIIIs a bit actually). Tannehill is a more unlikely choice, which fits a bit of the Mike Shanahan mold. Plus there is the Mike Sherman-Kyle Shanahan connection from their days with the Texans. And I also have a feeling still that our first first round pick won't be a QB.
Is that feeling backed up any inside knowledge? I can possibly see us trade back a bit (perhaps with the browns), draft a true number one WR and pick up tannehill in the second. I'd still rather we take Barkley with the first pick... I'm tired of mediocre QB play.
mbedner3420 is offline  
Old 12-12-2011, 12:41 PM   #525
Mad Men
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,097
Re: 2012 QB Prospects (Part 2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
[/B]

Something you've said a couple/few times now. Have no idea what to say except I hope you're wrong on this one.

...actually, I'd say not drafting the best QB w/ our first pick would reflect Mike's supreme arrogance and ego. The fact there's even a chance of this happening (which I acknowledge) should be enough reason to bring in a new regime.
Well I guess it's terrible if you think the gap between Barkley/RGIII (let's assume they're both available) and let's say Tannehill and Jonathan Martin is significant.

Personally, I think if Barkley is there we should take him and not even hesitate. RG III I still have some doubts about. But I'm just telling you what I think may happen. It's an informed guess.

Just remember, it's only December
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Closed Thread
Page 35 of 45 « First 253334 35 3637 Last »

Bookmarks

« Should Oliver Luck pull a power play on the Colts? | RGIII Heisman Winner »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38 AM.

Contact Us - The Warpath: Redskins Fan Site - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.27664 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24