![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #91 | |
| Pro Bowl ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,020
| Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III) Quote:
__________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you. | |
| |
| Advertisements |
| | #92 |
| Pro Bowl ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,020
| Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III) I mean looking at the entire draft we need a QB worse than any other team picking in the top 10 (assuming Manning plays another couple/few years), if anyone should be trading up to get one of the top talents it should be us.
__________________ Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes he eats you. |
| |
| | #93 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III) Quote:
Anything I actually say about Mike Shanahan's line of thinking is pure observation or speculation. I don't think it's accurate to say that Spurrier or Zorn's teams quit on them. I think it's accurate to say that the organization quit on Zorn at some point during the 2009 season (which it hasn't yet -- at least obviously -- done with Shanahan). Obviously, with a team that hasn't won three games in a row for Shanahan yet and with a team that hasn't gone 3-3 in the division since Zorn was the coach, there is plenty for the team to prove down the stretch here. I'd say a 7-9 record with this kind of finish would put the team on schedule, pending future moves. It does not mean, to me at least, that the team is on the right track in spite of all the other evidence, but it would be an important first step, particularly with all the youth that is playing for this team. I think the record would show with the history of this team that they probably aren't going to be that competitive in both of these last two games. So hopefully they can go out and show a couple more opponents that they can play a little bit.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| |
| | #94 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 6,501
| Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III) I give up on who the Redskins will draft until the season is over, if they win their next 2 games many things can change, even if they only beat the Vikings.
__________________ Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth |
| |
| | #95 |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III) In that scenario we traded with the Bills.
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. |
| |
| | #96 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,579
| Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III) Well we do have a trading history (now) with the Jags, so hopefully we do trade with them.
__________________ When in doubt, go with the SEC |
| |
| | #97 |
| The Starter ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 1,937
| Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III) I agree, we have the biggest need at QB. We are the team that should be moving up. The way I see it, we need to come away with Luck, Barkley, or RG3. Period. And that order is also my order of preference. |
| |
| | #98 |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 6,501
| Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III) Agreed.
__________________ Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth |
| |
| | #99 |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,098
| Truthishly, I'd have them taking one of those guys more in the 15-20 range. But I got lazy and didn't want to keep guessing picks
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
| |
| | #100 |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
| Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III) Using Smoot's scenario as a jump off......and the idea of the Ram's trading Bradford... If the Browns jump up to draft RGIII what would do you think it would take to get Colt McCoy (who's career production is on par if not better then Sam's Bradfords)?
__________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole Last edited by 30gut; 12-19-2011 at 09:23 PM. |
| |
| | #101 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Norman, OK Age: 26
Posts: 12,981
| I dont see where some of u guys are coming up w these QB scenarios?? Lol rams trading Sam? No chance Vikings trading ponder after half a season?? No chance and no to colt McCoy he sucks, small and avg arm, I'd rathe have Sanchez. As For Landry jones, I hope he stays at OU he needs it. I want Barkley or Luck obviously that's prob not gonna happen so RG or Tannenhill seems more likely
__________________ Robert Griffin III "if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker |
| |
| | #102 | |
| NFC East Champs ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Canada
Posts: 1,791
| Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III) Quote:
| |
| |
| | #103 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,560
| Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III) Last week I projected how the schedule would pan out for us and our draft prospects. Here is an update.... Indianapolis Colts 1-13 New England - Loss (L) @Baltimore - Loss (L) Tennessee - Loss (W) Houston - Loss @Jacksonville - Loss Minnesota Vikings 2-12 Denver - Loss (L) @Detroit - Loss (L) New Orleans - Loss (L) @Washington - Loss Chicago - Loss St. Louis Rams 2-12 San Francisco - Loss (L) @Seattle - Loss (L) Cincinnati - Loss (L) @Pittsburgh - Loss San Francisco - Loss Carolina Panthers 6-8 @Tampa Bay - Loss (W) Atlanta - Win (L) @Houston - Loss (W) Tampa Bay - Win @New Orleans - Loss Miami Dolphins 5-9 Oakland - Loss (W) Philadelphia - Win (L) @Buffalo - Win (W) @New England - Loss New York Jets - Loss Jacksonville Jaguars 4-10 San Diego - Win (L) Tampa Bay - Loss (W) @Atlanta - Loss (L) @Tennessee - Loss Indianapolis - Win Washington Redskins 5-9 New York Jets - Loss (L) New England - Loss (L) @New York Giants - Loss (W) Minnesota - Win @Philadelphia - Loss 2012 Projected Draft Order **Note: Draft order subject to change** 1. Indianapolis Colts 1-16 2. St. Louis Rams 2-14 3. Minnesota Vikings 2-14 4. Cleveland Browns 4-12 5. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 4-12 6. Jacksonville Jaguars 5-11 7. Miami Dolphins 5-11 8. Kansas City Chiefs 6-10 9. Washington Redskins 6-10 10. Carolina Panthers 6-10
__________________ Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever... Draft winners, not stars. Hail to the Redskins Hail victory Braves on the warpath Block for RG3 Last edited by SkinzWin; 12-19-2011 at 11:47 PM. |
| |
| | #104 | |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Norman, OK Age: 26
Posts: 12,981
| Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III) Quote:
Actually I say Indy goes 2-14 w STL, so I think the Rams would actually get the 1st pick right?
__________________ Robert Griffin III "if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker | |
| |
| | #105 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,560
| Re: 2012 Draft-QB Prospects (Part III) Do tied records go by head-to-head or strength of schedule? If it is head-to-head it would most definitely be St. Louis if that were to happen. But if it is S.O.S. then whoever has the lower strength would go first regardless of the heads up outcome.
__________________ Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever... Draft winners, not stars. Hail to the Redskins Hail victory Braves on the warpath Block for RG3 |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |