Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2012, 10:03 PM   #121
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,348
I'm sorry but cousins does not impress me at all ugh
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-24-2012, 10:20 PM   #122
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,963
Re: The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

Depending on the circumstances I can see us spending one of our 4ths on Cousins, nothing higher
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 10:24 PM   #123
Gamebreaker
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 12,579
Re: The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

Listening to Mike Mayock today on the Jim Rome Show, his thinking is Tannehill doesnt make it pass 12. Wow unbelievable.
__________________
Boycott Rolling Stone Magazine
Chico23231 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 10:27 PM   #124
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,348
Re: The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

there's always the "Reach" player in every draft, Ponder was last year IMO and I can see RT being this years..
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 10:34 PM   #125
Gamebreaker
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 12,579
Re: The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

I just think its a crime if we take Tannehill at 6 and leave a Claiborne or Blackmon on the board. The 1# CB and 1# WR in the draft to take a distant number 3, 4 or 5 rated QB. Gotta think value at the skill positions and look at our reasonable needs. WR and CB are needs, even though QB is our greatest need...we gotta be smart.
__________________
Boycott Rolling Stone Magazine
Chico23231 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 10:35 PM   #126
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,348
Re: The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

we won't take a QB in the first unless it's RG3 or Luck..

Only way is if we trade back into the 1st. I still say Manning is a redskin next month
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 10:48 PM   #127
MVP
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVa
Age: 26
Posts: 12,107
Re: The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Depending on the circumstances I can see us spending one of our 4ths on Cousins, nothing higher
I'd rather use one of our mid-to-late rounders on Kellen Moore or Russell Wilson. Cousins is okay but I haven't seen much from him, albeit in the very limited action I've seen of him.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 10:52 PM   #128
Franchise Player
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
General impression I'm getting from people there as far which QBs came across the most impressive in press conferences/interviews/general character

1. RG3
2. Cousins
3. Luck/Weeden
5. Foles
6. Tannehill
Wow that is really interesting I wonder if it builds RGIII stock.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 10:59 PM   #129
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,963
Re: The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
Listening to Mike Mayock today on the Jim Rome Show, his thinking is Tannehill doesnt make it pass 12. Wow unbelievable.
Think that's why I and a lot of others have been saying as well. Might have been different if Landry Jones and Barkley declared, but they didn't.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 11:02 PM   #130
Playmaker
 
SkinzWin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,725
Re: The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Think that's why I and a lot of others have been saying as well. Might have been different if Landry Jones and Barkley declared, but they didn't.
This year's Gabbert and Ponder no?
__________________
Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever...

Draft winners, not stars.

Hail to the Redskins
Hail victory
Braves on the warpath
Block for RG3
SkinzWin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 11:06 PM   #131
The Starter
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,099
Re: The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
Listening to Mike Mayock today on the Jim Rome Show, his thinking is Tannehill doesnt make it pass 12. Wow unbelievable.
I'm shocked utterly shocked
__________________
No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 11:09 PM   #132
Franchise Player
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 7,880
Re: The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
Listening to Mike Mayock today on the Jim Rome Show, his thinking is Tannehill doesnt make it pass 12. Wow unbelievable.
Supply and demand. There are at least 6 teams that need QB's and Tannehill is considered the 3rd best QB, therefore someone will make the move before someone else beats them to get him.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 11:14 PM   #133
Gamebreaker
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 12,579
Re: The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Think that's why I and a lot of others have been saying as well. Might have been different if Landry Jones and Barkley declared, but they didn't.
yeah remember you saying the samething. I just dont know how I feel about such a gamble. Mayock backed that up with last year's Ponder and Locker picks being reaches but paraphrasing in some way just to emphasize how QB have become such a necessity in a passing league. They're always exceptions, but we may be ripe for a reach considering Shanny's mismanagement of the QB position in a short tenure. In the back of his mind, I wonder whats more important, the right FA QB signing or the right QB draft pick? Whatever the plan is, it needs to be a combo of both, that right combination is especially tricky with Manning coming out and his health issues and the fact Jones and Barkely deciding to stay. Shanny's in a tight spot.
__________________
Boycott Rolling Stone Magazine
Chico23231 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 11:38 PM   #134
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,963
Re: The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
yeah remember you saying the samething. I just dont know how I feel about such a gamble. Mayock backed that up with last year's Ponder and Locker picks being reaches but paraphrasing in some way just to emphasize how QB have become such a necessity in a passing league. They're always exceptions, but we may be ripe for a reach considering Shanny's mismanagement of the QB position in a short tenure. In the back of his mind, I wonder whats more important, the right FA QB signing or the right QB draft pick? Whatever the plan is, it needs to be a combo of both, that right combination is especially tricky with Manning coming out and his health issues and the fact Jones and Barkely deciding to stay. Shanny's in a tight spot.
Watch us sign Peyton and somehow also trade for Luck, ha!....

But seriously though I tend to think still that our first pick won't be a QB. Of course, a lot of that is based on my not corroborated by any sources theory that we're going to make a trade offer to the Pats for Hoyer
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2012, 11:52 PM   #135
Mann Up HOF!
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,013
Re: The Official 2012 NFL Combine Thread

Barring a trade for Hoyer, I think we will take Tannehill at 6. And I will be happy. Yes, I know that we have other needs and a guy like Claiborne can fill one. And yes, it would be a reach. But you've got to get your guy at QB. We lost our guy last year - let's not make the same mistake.
__________________
Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder.
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26815 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25