Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Gtothearry · 03-09-2012, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GusFrerotte

Nope. We don't have the team in place to make a run yet. I thought we were on the right path for a change to build a solid winner. Any good SB winning HOF QB in the last 20 years always had a star studded cast to help him win. Do you think we are a star studded team? We gave up the ghost for a guy with reat talent, but who doesn't have the best Wr corp or O line protecting him. If our WR corp was more reliable and the O line solid the deal would have been OK, but with the reality of the situation, this is a big ass gamble.

Yes, we have holes but a great QB makes a team better. Place some of the Patriots offensive playmakers on the Skins with Grossman at QB and see how great they do.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 03-09-2012, 11:29 PM

It's not like we traded a 2nd for TJ Duckett all over again.

musicmaster45 · 03-09-2012, 11:29 PM

Ok even though the surprise is gone every single one of us will be watching the draft just to see RG3's name get called up for us. Remember this moment. The moment the Redskins were reborn haha

GTripp0012 · 03-09-2012, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warriorzpath

Let me ask this question - assuming that the redskins really had a slim chance for manning, did Shanahan really have another option this year at qb- without getting fired?

I think he could have tried to poach Alex Smith as a stopgap.

That would have been buying high, sure, and Smith isn't anyone's franchise quarterback, but it would have been a legit acquisition at the QB position that wouldn't have cost draft value and would have swung the leverage back to the Redskins.

Ruhskins · 03-09-2012, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

Yoda? Really? I just said that when people said I was crazy for offering up (whats now nothing) a large amount of picks people said it wouldn't be that much I said it would to get it to that. That's all I was trying to say. I was gonna message you this but I can't message for some reason. Maybe you can tell me how.

So Lotus, who would you get for RG3 to throw to since we have no second rounder now?

So much for stopping acting like a child and letting it go.

Hail to the Redskins · 03-09-2012, 11:31 PM

"Originally Posted by GusFrerotte
Stupid. You just traded away 3 badly needed starters for one. What happened through getting more picks like NE and building steadily. This kid isn't a Manning or Elway or Luck type out of college. He is a very good QB no less, but played in a weakend Big 12 that happens to be defensively deficient most of the time. Snyder has done it again, got the fans snagged on the hot sexy pick, hoping it will pan out. I think BA and Shanny are feeling the heat so they went against the plan to save their asses. I like RG III a lot, but 3 first rounders for a still unproven commodity at the NFL level is not wise."

I'm not a "RGII walks on water person", but I'll say this...

vs Texas = #11 defense in the country in 2012 (they were VERY good):
RGIII - 15-22, 320 yds, 2 TD, INT

vs TCU = #34 in the country:
21-27, 359 yds, 5 TD, 0 INT

Those aren't OK numbers... they are great... and he's playing with a Baylor offensive line (not Wisconsin's), and throwing to Baylor WRs (not Miami's or USCs).

I just mean, he may flop, but I hate when people use the whole Big 12 argument... that's just me.

SFREDSKIN · 03-09-2012, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

It's not like we traded a 2nd for TJ Duckett all over again.

Only time will tell, no one knows.

SkinzWin · 03-09-2012, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GusFrerotte

Going all in isn't the style that BA and Shanny started off with in their first two drafts. Get more picks, draft smart, draft needs. RG III right now might be akin to Vick in ATL. He will be fun to watch, but with a less talented supporting cast. Face it you go all in and lose, you lose for awhile. What happened when we drafted Shuler, many thought he was a sure thing also way back then. The Shuler debacle killed this team for over a decade. We still haven't found a franchise QB!! I really hope I am eating crow this time in 2013, but if I am not Holy Shit, you might be looking at another 2-4 years of crappy win loss records.

People doubted Cam Newton. He did okay. Stop hatting hatter.

donofriose · 03-09-2012, 11:31 PM

What would you have rather had? I am excited for this team and its future and it has been a while. What keep hoping for next year since we always just miss out on that quarterback. We are basically giving up two additional first round picks and a second. I wouldn't prefer it but I like it more than hoping to get a quarterback next year. I am sick of waiting and now I know we got a playmaker and not rex grossman looking like an idiot. Quarterbacks make teams and now we finally have a team.

Ruhskins · 03-09-2012, 11:31 PM

In other news Vinny Cerrato says he would have done the same for Justin Blackmon. LOL.

warriorzpath · 03-09-2012, 11:32 PM

If we're comparing those draft classes.
Ryan Tannehill = Alex Smith
Andrew Luck = Aaron Rodgers
RGIII = ????

Here's hoping that he's better than Rodgers, but I think RGIII is better than Smith right now.

Lotus · 03-09-2012, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

In all honesty, I happen to prefer what the Redskins actually did to taking Tannehill at six.

But I have to be right about BOTH Griffin AND Tannehill. If not right about both, then I am wrong about preferring this trade.

If Griffin isn't the clear no. 1 on the depth chart in 2014 for whatever reason and Tannehill is starting in this league, this will be the worst trade in modern NFL history, and what Shanahan will ultimately be remembered for, instead of the super bowls.

So yeah, this is very much going all-in. Recklessly all-in.

Agreed. Just a bit too reckless for my taste right now. Like I said, Griffin had better be solid gold. Forget clear #1 by 2014; we'd better be talking Pro Bowl in 2014.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 03-09-2012, 11:32 PM

No need to watch the first hour of the draft lol. Time to get the RG3 jersey, as soon as find out what number he is.

Shadowbyte · 03-09-2012, 11:32 PM

I was just driving on my lunch break and almost crashed my pickup when they broke this on KNBR. WTF is Shannahan doing! I rather take Tannehill instead of paying that price.

GTripp0012 · 03-09-2012, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

It's not like we traded a 2nd for TJ Duckett all over again.

Redskins trade for RG3: "Hey, at least its not TJ Duckett!"

View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2?
Yes	193	91.47%
No	18	8.53%
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll

03-09-2012, 11:29 PM	#152
EARTHQUAKE2689 You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24 Posts: 11,005	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft It's not like we traded a 2nd for TJ Duckett all over again. __________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it.

03-09-2012, 11:29 PM	#153
musicmaster45 Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Colorado Posts: 373	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Ok even though the surprise is gone every single one of us will be watching the draft just to see RG3's name get called up for us. Remember this moment. The moment the Redskins were reborn haha __________________ Shanahann loves the colleges i do...... Purdue and Nebraska FTW!!!!

03-09-2012, 11:31 PM	#156
Hail to the Redskins The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 1,319	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft "Originally Posted by GusFrerotte Stupid. You just traded away 3 badly needed starters for one. What happened through getting more picks like NE and building steadily. This kid isn't a Manning or Elway or Luck type out of college. He is a very good QB no less, but played in a weakend Big 12 that happens to be defensively deficient most of the time. Snyder has done it again, got the fans snagged on the hot sexy pick, hoping it will pan out. I think BA and Shanny are feeling the heat so they went against the plan to save their asses. I like RG III a lot, but 3 first rounders for a still unproven commodity at the NFL level is not wise." I'm not a "RGII walks on water person", but I'll say this... vs Texas = #11 defense in the country in 2012 (they were VERY good): RGIII - 15-22, 320 yds, 2 TD, INT vs TCU = #34 in the country: 21-27, 359 yds, 5 TD, 0 INT Those aren't OK numbers... they are great... and he's playing with a Baylor offensive line (not Wisconsin's), and throwing to Baylor WRs (not Miami's or USCs). I just mean, he may flop, but I hate when people use the whole Big 12 argument... that's just me. __________________ “Sometimes it is not enough to our best; we must do what is required.” - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

03-09-2012, 11:31 PM	#159
donofriose Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 708	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft What would you have rather had? I am excited for this team and its future and it has been a while. What keep hoping for next year since we always just miss out on that quarterback. We are basically giving up two additional first round picks and a second. I wouldn't prefer it but I like it more than hoping to get a quarterback next year. I am sick of waiting and now I know we got a playmaker and not rex grossman looking like an idiot. Quarterbacks make teams and now we finally have a team.

03-09-2012, 11:31 PM	#160
Ruhskins Gamebreaker Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia, MD Age: 34 Posts: 14,592	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft In other news Vinny Cerrato says he would have done the same for Justin Blackmon. LOL. __________________ R.I.P. #21 New words created on The Warpath: Rewalsr - Somretimes - Fualt - Jersesy - Itiot - Composetory Afeard - Storgn - Empliment - Gaissn - Saftys - Minnisota Faviort - Hatter - Phsyched - Foof - Heloing - Brutual Stroried Check out this cool local internet radio show Weds 7-9pm: The DC Sports Chat I sense an annoyance in the Force

03-09-2012, 11:32 PM	#161
warriorzpath The Starter Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 1,394	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft If we're comparing those draft classes. Ryan Tannehill = Alex Smith Andrew Luck = Aaron Rodgers RGIII = ???? Here's hoping that he's better than Rodgers, but I think RGIII is better than Smith right now.

03-09-2012, 11:32 PM	#163
EARTHQUAKE2689 You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24 Posts: 11,005	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft No need to watch the first hour of the draft lol. Time to get the RG3 jersey, as soon as find out what number he is. __________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it.

03-09-2012, 11:32 PM	#164
Shadowbyte Special Teams Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 383	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft I was just driving on my lunch break and almost crashed my pickup when they broke this on KNBR. WTF is Shannahan doing! I rather take Tannehill instead of paying that price.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

NFL Draft Central