Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

SBXVII · 03-10-2012, 03:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Goat

yes I bought a bottle of J Walker Gold earlier and sipped it liberally. But seriously, if a dude doesn't have an attractive girlfriend/wife I tend to think he lacks confidence. I say this from experience on both sides of the coin. If a rich, famous, star athlete doesn't have a bombshell girlfriend there's something amiss IMO.

Hopefully Griffin is single or dating Miss America by regular season lol...

And everyone said you can't go wrong with RGIII, he always makes the right decisions or choices.

SBXVII · 03-10-2012, 03:50 AM

On a side note,

I'm not sure if someone tweeted to Oldenburg or if he put it out there but the tweet said "David Stern to veto Redskins/Rams trade, keep following story developing."

Not sure if they were just being stupid or if there is something to it and not sure if the trade can be stopped. Does the League have to agree with the trade or can teams trade without League approval?

Ruhskins · 03-10-2012, 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBXVII

On a side note,

I'm not sure if someone tweeted to Oldenburg or if he put it out there but the tweet said "David Stern to veto Redskins/Rams trade, keep following story developing."

Not sure if they were just being stupid or if there is something to it and not sure if the trade can be stopped. Does the League have to agree with the trade or can teams trade without League approval?

I think Jason Whitlock was the first one to tweet this and it was more a pun at Stern who vetoed the Chris Paul to the Lakers trade.

Meks · 03-10-2012, 04:01 AM

Andrew luck falls 2nd to redskins ... *plot thickens *

Meks · 03-10-2012, 04:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

3 high draft picks for one guy? What an overpay! When do we ever get on the right side of trades? Never. I like RG3 a lot but not at this price. This team simply isn't in a position to throw away high draft picks.

This.

Meks · 03-10-2012, 04:06 AM

We will sign manning and Wayne and moved up to get blackmon 2nd overall :-( lmao this trade semi annoys me

sdskinsfan2001 · 03-10-2012, 04:08 AM

It is 1:05 in the morning pst! I am going to read every single post before I go to bed, I am so jacked up right now! HAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!

If you think the price was too much, you could be right, but lets enjoy it, we have a franchise QB. Does it feel good? Fluffing right it does. Have I mentioned HAILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?

SC Skins Fan · 03-10-2012, 04:17 AM

This trade is a bad one for the Redskins. They have once again given up too much compensation for a player and have undervalued the draft. I have a difficult time actually seeing this as being any different than any other trade that they have made in the last 12 years. If anyone had thrown out this trade as a hypothetical there would have been 50 pages of people saying "that is horrible, it is mortgaging the Redskins future!" Then it actually happens and people are dancing in the streets. And a picture of Griffin holding a Lombardi trophy. Really? At least the expectations are realistic and you recognize the immense value that the Redskins have given up. To put it in concrete terms, if the Giants had made this trade in 2004 for Eli Manning and you look at the players picked with the equivalent picks that the Redskins gave up, it is Phillip Rivers, Chris Snee, Shawn Merriman, and Santonio Holmes (Giants traded out of pick 25, they actually drafted Kiwanuka). Every one of those players has played in a Pro Bowl. Hey, but at least the Redskins are only one player away from a championship! Plus this trade will actually have compounding results because it will compel the Redskins to go and overpay for marginal players in free agency (I'm thinking Colston and VJax, but just throw in their equivalents, guys who will be overpaid based upon their numbers in very favorable offensive systems with very good QBs), both this year and in coming years. The only one (admittedly I did not read EVERY post) willing to actually say that the Redskins horribly overpaid is GTripp. I think Redskins fans might just get what they deserve.

30gut · 03-10-2012, 04:27 AM

Wow, I absolutely love Griff.
I'm gonna have to stick my head in the sand on the cost though.

HTTR!

SkinItup · 03-10-2012, 04:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SC Skins Fan

This trade is a bad one for the Redskins. They have once again given up too much compensation for a player and have undervalued the draft. I have a difficult time actually seeing this as being any different than any other trade that they have made in the last 12 years. If anyone had thrown out this trade as a hypothetical there would have been 50 pages of people saying "that is horrible, it is mortgaging the Redskins future!" Then it actually happens and people are dancing in the streets. And a picture of Griffin holding a Lombardi trophy. Really? At least the expectations are realistic and you recognize the immense value that the Redskins have given up. To put it in concrete terms, if the Giants had made this trade in 2004 for Eli Manning and you look at the players picked with the equivalent picks that the Redskins gave up, it is Phillip Rivers, Chris Snee, Shawn Merriman, and Santonio Holmes (Giants traded out of pick 25, they actually drafted Kiwanuka). Every one of those players has played in a Pro Bowl. Hey, but at least the Redskins are only one player away from a championship! Plus this trade will actually have compounding results because it will compel the Redskins to go and overpay for marginal players in free agency (I'm thinking Colston and VJax, but just throw in their equivalents, guys who will be overpaid based upon their numbers in very favorable offensive systems with very good QBs), both this year and in coming years. The only one (admittedly I did not read EVERY post) willing to actually say that the Redskins horribly overpaid is GTripp. I think Redskins fans might just get what they deserve.

Negative Nelly. I have wanted RG3 since September but I think the price is too high. With that said RG3 is not a pro ready qb and perhaps that with the new rookie wage scale this trade makes sense. While we turn him into a pro qb, we surround him with some mid level talent and by the time he is an all-pro we will be able to draft good toys for him.

We need to a build a team. An athletic qb with accuracy, a run game, and a turnover based D sounds like it a good foundations in today's league. Only time will tell if we gave up too much.

Luxorreb · 03-10-2012, 04:30 AM

This is a great trade. Although I'm still not totally convinced that Irsay takes Luck. Either way we have a franchise QB. I know a 1st for 1st, 2nd, 1st, 1st seems like a lot. But it's really not if we consistently play .500 ball. Sure we need other areas. All teams do. Even the Pats or Packers. I'm excited to see Luck or more probably RG3 in Burgundy and Gold! Go Redskins! Thanks for making my offseason always exciting!!!

skins89moss · 03-10-2012, 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

^ Don't forget Bryce Harper Dirt.

John Wall are you serious. Yea he has really improved the sorry ass Wizards. I will give them some credit for beating the Fakers the other night.

skins89moss · 03-10-2012, 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iRepDMV

Robert Griffin would look awfully nice in a #6 jersey! HTTR!!

He wore number #10 at Baylor so i expect him to wear it for the Redskins.

Chico23231 · 03-10-2012, 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 30gut

Wow, I absolutely love Griff.
I'm gonna have to stick my head in the sand on the cost though.

HTTR!

2014 First round really burns me. I could careless about the second this year and next years first...but that additional 1st? ugh

But im with you 100% 30, I gonna stick my head in the sand and at 430 in the morning, start drinking again...HTTR!

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 03-10-2012, 04:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skins89moss

He wore number #10 at Baylor so i expect him to wear it for the Redskins.

Jabar Gaffney?

View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2?
Yes	193	91.47%
No	18	8.53%
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll

03-10-2012, 03:50 AM	#302
SBXVII Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia Posts: 7,498	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft On a side note, I'm not sure if someone tweeted to Oldenburg or if he put it out there but the tweet said "David Stern to veto Redskins/Rams trade, keep following story developing." Not sure if they were just being stupid or if there is something to it and not sure if the trade can be stopped. Does the League have to agree with the trade or can teams trade without League approval?

03-10-2012, 04:01 AM	#304
Meks The Starter Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: South Jersey Age: 27 Posts: 1,744	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Andrew luck falls 2nd to redskins ... plot thickens __________________ NFL officiating is BY FAR the worst in proffessional sports. Except no substitutions... worse or not!! R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR

03-10-2012, 04:06 AM	#306
Meks The Starter Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: South Jersey Age: 27 Posts: 1,744	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft We will sign manning and Wayne and moved up to get blackmon 2nd overall :-( lmao this trade semi annoys me __________________ NFL officiating is BY FAR the worst in proffessional sports. Except no substitutions... worse or not!! R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR

03-10-2012, 04:08 AM	#307
sdskinsfan2001 Special Teams Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: San Diego, CA Age: 29 Posts: 453	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft It is 1:05 in the morning pst! I am going to read every single post before I go to bed, I am so jacked up right now! HAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!! If you think the price was too much, you could be right, but lets enjoy it, we have a franchise QB. Does it feel good? Fluffing right it does. Have I mentioned HAILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?

03-10-2012, 04:17 AM	#308
SC Skins Fan The Starter Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: South Carolina Posts: 1,554	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft This trade is a bad one for the Redskins. They have once again given up too much compensation for a player and have undervalued the draft. I have a difficult time actually seeing this as being any different than any other trade that they have made in the last 12 years. If anyone had thrown out this trade as a hypothetical there would have been 50 pages of people saying "that is horrible, it is mortgaging the Redskins future!" Then it actually happens and people are dancing in the streets. And a picture of Griffin holding a Lombardi trophy. Really? At least the expectations are realistic and you recognize the immense value that the Redskins have given up. To put it in concrete terms, if the Giants had made this trade in 2004 for Eli Manning and you look at the players picked with the equivalent picks that the Redskins gave up, it is Phillip Rivers, Chris Snee, Shawn Merriman, and Santonio Holmes (Giants traded out of pick 25, they actually drafted Kiwanuka). Every one of those players has played in a Pro Bowl. Hey, but at least the Redskins are only one player away from a championship! Plus this trade will actually have compounding results because it will compel the Redskins to go and overpay for marginal players in free agency (I'm thinking Colston and VJax, but just throw in their equivalents, guys who will be overpaid based upon their numbers in very favorable offensive systems with very good QBs), both this year and in coming years. The only one (admittedly I did not read EVERY post) willing to actually say that the Redskins horribly overpaid is GTripp. I think Redskins fans might just get what they deserve. __________________ It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.

03-10-2012, 04:27 AM	#309
30gut The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 2,075	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Wow, I absolutely love Griff. I'm gonna have to stick my head in the sand on the cost though. HTTR! __________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole

03-10-2012, 04:30 AM	#311
Luxorreb ^21^ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Richmond, Virginia Age: 41 Posts: 1,601	Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft This is a great trade. Although I'm still not totally convinced that Irsay takes Luck. Either way we have a franchise QB. I know a 1st for 1st, 2nd, 1st, 1st seems like a lot. But it's really not if we consistently play .500 ball. Sure we need other areas. All teams do. Even the Pats or Packers. I'm excited to see Luck or more probably RG3 in Burgundy and Gold! Go Redskins! Thanks for making my offseason always exciting!!! __________________ GO SKINS!!! ^21^

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

NFL Draft Central