![]() |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2? | |||
| Yes | | 193 | 91.47% |
| No | | 18 | 8.53% |
| Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #616 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Norman, OK Age: 26
Posts: 12,981
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft I meant by Free Agency ad going nuts like we used too, McNabb was a trade that just didn't work but we didn't give him crazy $
__________________ Robert Griffin III "if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker |
| |
| Advertisements |
| | #617 | |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Quote: /sarcasm
__________________ Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. | |
| |
| | #618 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 643
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft I love this trade (see tag line). No amount of contrarian shade throwing will kill my buzz! Sweet QB bliss!
__________________ RG3 or bust!!!!!!!!!! |
| |
| | #619 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 653
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft do i think we overpaid? yes. do i think it was necessary? yes...
__________________ Is this the part where we argue? GO LAKERS |
| |
| | #620 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 522
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Give me 1 SB appearance and this trade will never be questioned |
| |
| | #621 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Springfield, VA Age: 30
Posts: 15,620
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft yes, we overpaid, but either you think the trade will work out or you think it won't. all the yeah buts sounds like reserving future "i told you so" fence sitting. I didn't like the QBs last year (draft/on the team), I though beck was a wasted pick, and i don't like barkley as much as rgiii or luck, so i'm fine with it. maybe it turns out to be a huge mistake, but i think the floor potential on this isn't that low and the ceiling is very very high. we took a chance, and i'm hoping it works. and yes, i would have liked to pay less for rgiii, but if the choice is between the picks for him or taking the somewhat meh RT, i agree with our FO on this one.
__________________ Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes! |
| |
| | #622 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Springfield, VA Age: 30
Posts: 15,620
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft oh, and only 294 posts to go :P
__________________ Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes! |
| |
| | #623 | |
| Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,498
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Quote:
Why did the choice have to be between RGIII or a RT? I would have figured they would have taken the next best QB in the draft or WR. | |
| |
| | #624 | |
| Mann Up HOF! ![]() Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 8,906
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Quote:
__________________ Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder. | |
| |
| | #625 |
| Mad Men ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 43,098
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft I think by RT he meant Ryan Tannehill
__________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
| |
| | #626 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Quote:
If Bradford is out of the league in three years and Griffin goes on to be Robert Griffin, then the Rams probably didn't get enough to justify their decision to not pick Griffin. But they couldn't have done any better in the trade market. And so yes, they still win. I don't think we can just go out and set expectations for Griffin so high as to win games by himself with the roster as currently constructed. I think we have to be very accepting that if Griffin ends up being a periodicly exciting, often frustrating, quality NFL starter who does get a big money second contract from the Redskins, well, that's what the second overall pick is supposed to get you. Steve McNair and Kerry Collins weren't draft busts. They played in Super Bowls. IMO, the expectations for Griffin will be tied to what the Redskins gave up for him, but the Redskins were likely just being shortsighted.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” Last edited by GTripp0012; 03-11-2012 at 12:36 AM. | |
| |
| | #627 |
| The Starter Join Date: Jan 2006 Age: 24
Posts: 1,035
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Let's be honest here, we (as Redskins fans) shouldn't care who is perceived as the winner of the trade if RGIII can come in here and lead our team to multiple playoff appearances. If the Rams go on and win a Superbowl in three years good for them, but it doesn't mean we would have similar success had we kept those draft picks, and it doesn't mean we made the wrong move. The only way this trade should be deemed a failure is if RGIII is a true bust and we continue to lose more games than we win. I don't need to see his bust in Canton 30 years from now to deem this trade a success, what I need is a return to winning ways.
__________________ doing it all in the spirit of the salary cap! Last edited by Swarley; 03-11-2012 at 04:00 AM. |
| |
| | #628 |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft I already don't give a damn about who the "winner" is and don't care what we gave up. It's done, it's over, we got our QB and I haven't been this excited since I saw that woman fall at McDonalds. Time to move on to free agency. Lets go baby!!!!
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. |
| |
| | #629 | |
| Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 155
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Quote:
We have young talent and the drafts have been good. Allen and Shanny are finding talent in later rounds. If we get another starter or 2 and a couple more backups in this years draft we could have the depth and offensive capabilities ready to heavily contribute to in the 2013 season Hankerson and another FA WR or draftee, Helu and Royster sharing carries, and Davis at te. If RG3 can be the spark, he could have a few weapons. It looks like Shanny is building a finesse O. | |
| |
| | #630 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Pipe Creek, Texas
Posts: 48
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft This is an amazing feeling. The first game at FedEx will be crazy. I wish I could be there but I have a feeling the Skins are about to get more national exposure |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |