![]() |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2? | |||
| Yes | | 193 | 91.47% |
| No | | 18 | 8.53% |
| Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #646 | |
| Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 457
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Quote:
| |
| |
| Advertisements |
| | #647 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Queens, NYC Age: 43
Posts: 2,975
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft |
| |
| | #648 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Quote:
2 first rounders + a 2nd rounder + 2013 1st and 2nd rounders? Yes, I would make that trade.
__________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole Last edited by 30gut; 03-11-2012 at 12:25 PM. | |
| |
| | #649 | |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,328
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Quote:
| |
| |
| | #650 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Queens, NYC Age: 43
Posts: 2,975
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Watch HIGHLIGHT film of this guy (RG3) and you won't make that deal IMO. Meaning we would NOT trade back with cleveland to #4. |
| |
| | #651 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Age: 42
Posts: 4,529
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Will some of you feel better if we package our 3rd and 4th to move back up into the 2nd? We'd still have 4th, 5th, 6th and at least one 7th.
__________________ No Pressure-No Diamonds! Go Catch Your Dreams! |
| |
| | #652 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: los angeles, ca Age: 28
Posts: 3,850
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft i feel fine about where we stand
__________________ 7 9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 70 81 |
| |
| | #653 |
| Mann Up HOF! ![]() Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 8,906
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Is anyone else feeling the sticker shock of the Griffin deal wearing off and pure joy arising from having a stud QB?
__________________ Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder. |
| |
| | #654 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft I'm thinking no. I think RG3 was worth risking letting go of McCoy or pissing him off drafting his perceived replacement. I'm not so sure if Tannehill is worth the gamble, when one could argue that McCoy is a couple supporting cast members of being a better than average QB. That's how I see it, anyways. I know I am. This is the most hopeful I've felt in more than a decade. Last edited by PaulieG; 03-11-2012 at 02:11 PM. |
| |
| | #655 |
| Mann Up HOF! ![]() Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 8,906
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft If things somehow shook out that we could move up to get Mike Adams in the 2nd, I'd go for that.
__________________ Rooting for the Dallas Cowboys should be recognized as a treatable mental disorder. |
| |
| | #656 |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,005
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Never had the sticker shock in the first place.
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. |
| |
| | #657 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Quote:
I don't know if I ever had sticker shock because the team had never convinced me it knew what it was doing before. So I wasn't like WHOA WHERE DID THOSE CAJONES COME FROM?!?!?! It was consistent with what we had seen from the Redskins before. My first emotion when word of the trade was joy, and then the joy faded when it became obvious that the Redskins didn't pull of a great deal or better their team or anything. They just cashed in their chips in what I would call a calculated, though impatient, manner. Free agency was always going to define the quality of their offseason IMO. So I'm definitely still taking a wait and see approach to grading this offseason because we don't know how well they've set the team up for the future yet.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| |
| | #658 | |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 62
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Quote:
Also, I have no photoshop skills, so it'll be a while before I get banned. | |
| |
| | #659 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Oh, man that was good.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| |
| | #660 | |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Quote:
Last edited by PaulieG; 03-11-2012 at 03:33 PM. | |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |