![]() |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2? | |||
| Yes | | 193 | 91.47% |
| No | | 18 | 8.53% |
| Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #976 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| |
| Advertisements |
| | #977 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft I would take Tannehill over Osweiler, given the choice. But I think the Dolphins are far more likely to trade down for a Parcellsian prospect in Osweiler vs. trading up for a guy in Tannehill who their offensive coordinator has already invested a considerable amount of effort into to get him to this point. I think Tannehill goes 5th overall to the Seahawks in a trade up.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| |
| | #978 | |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,010
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Quote:
Because the Seahawks didn't just sign Matt Flynn or anything.
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. | |
| |
| | #979 |
| The Starter Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,557
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft |
| |
| | #980 |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Norman, OK Age: 26
Posts: 12,996
| Flynn only got three year s but I still don't see them taking a qb
__________________ Robert Griffin III "if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker |
| |
| | #981 |
| You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 24
Posts: 11,010
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft If they traded up fo Tannehill yes I would as would everyone except GTripp.
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it. |
| |
| | #982 |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,143
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft I am not disputing that. Just pointing out that they're still aggressively involved in the quarterback market.
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” |
| |
| | #983 |
| The Starter Join Date: May 2008 Location: Vienna Va
Posts: 1,025
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Will the Seahawks select QB in the later rounds? Likely; but with Flynn signing, it's EXTREMELY unlikely they're going to trade up and select Tannehill at #5. |
| |
| | #984 |
| The Starter ![]() Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,044
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft tell you the truth, I could see Carroll drafting someone like Kellen Moore out of Boise St. in the 5th or 6th rounds and have him stashed away in case Flynn is a corn on the Kolb type flop.
__________________ Ain't Nothin Like a Good B Western. YEEHAW |
| |
| | #985 |
| The Starter Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: South Jersey Age: 27
Posts: 1,744
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Seahawks, will be looking at blackmon in a trade up scenario I presume
__________________ NFL officiating is BY FAR the worst in proffessional sports. Except no substitutions... worse or not!! R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR |
| |
| | #986 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 219
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft |
| |
| | #987 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Born and raised in D.C. and now lives in Harlem, New York
Posts: 2,030
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Quote:
| |
| |
| | #988 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 72,722
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft |
| |
| | #989 |
| MVP Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: NoVa Age: 24
Posts: 11,179
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft |
| |
| | #990 |
| The Starter Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,075
| Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft Wouldn't Sherman's experience with Tannehill make him much more appealing then Osweiler?
__________________ No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole |
| |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |