Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

NFL Draft Central


View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Redskins' trade up to #2?
Yes 193 91.47%
No 18 8.53%
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2012, 06:19 PM   #976
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 26
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

This is pretty interesting:

Gil Brandt expects Osweiler to be first-round pick | ProFootballTalk
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  

Advertisements
Old 03-30-2012, 06:24 PM   #977
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 26
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

I would take Tannehill over Osweiler, given the choice. But I think the Dolphins are far more likely to trade down for a Parcellsian prospect in Osweiler vs. trading up for a guy in Tannehill who their offensive coordinator has already invested a considerable amount of effort into to get him to this point.

I think Tannehill goes 5th overall to the Seahawks in a trade up.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 03-30-2012, 06:48 PM   #978
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 25
Posts: 12,232
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I would take Tannehill over Osweiler, given the choice. But I think the Dolphins are far more likely to trade down for a Parcellsian prospect in Osweiler vs. trading up for a guy in Tannehill who their offensive coordinator has already invested a considerable amount of effort into to get him to this point.



I think Tannehill goes 5th overall to the Seahawks in a trade up.


Because the Seahawks didn't just sign Matt Flynn or anything.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline  
Old 03-30-2012, 06:54 PM   #979
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,843
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
Because the Seahawks didn't just sign Matt Flynn or anything.
It's the Seahawks. Would you really be surprised?
mbedner3420 is offline  
Old 03-30-2012, 07:24 PM   #980
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,360
Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
Because the Seahawks didn't just sign Matt Flynn or anything.
Flynn only got three year s but I still don't see them taking a qb
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is online now  
Old 03-30-2012, 07:27 PM   #981
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 25
Posts: 12,232
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
It's the Seahawks. Would you really be surprised?


If they traded up fo Tannehill yes I would as would everyone except GTripp.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0

This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI

Awesome isn't it.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline  
Old 03-30-2012, 07:34 PM   #982
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 26
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
Because the Seahawks didn't just sign Matt Flynn or anything.
I am not disputing that. Just pointing out that they're still aggressively involved in the quarterback market.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 03-30-2012, 08:03 PM   #983
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vienna Va
Posts: 1,029
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Will the Seahawks select QB in the later rounds? Likely; but with Flynn signing, it's EXTREMELY unlikely they're going to trade up and select Tannehill at #5.
vallin21 is offline  
Old 03-30-2012, 08:35 PM   #984
The Starter
 
Mechanix544's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by vallin21 View Post
Will the Seahawks select QB in the later rounds? Likely; but with Flynn signing, it's EXTREMELY unlikely they're going to trade up and select Tannehill at #5.
tell you the truth, I could see Carroll drafting someone like Kellen Moore out of Boise St. in the 5th or 6th rounds and have him stashed away in case Flynn is a corn on the Kolb type flop.
Mechanix544 is offline  
Old 03-30-2012, 09:28 PM   #985
The Starter
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 29
Posts: 2,132
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Seahawks, will be looking at blackmon in a trade up scenario I presume
__________________
Leader of the Avy boycott until this organization makes smarter choices.

R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline  
Old 03-30-2012, 09:44 PM   #986
Registered User
 
Gary84Clark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,035
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechanix544 View Post
tell you the truth, I could see Carroll drafting someone like Kellen Moore out of Boise St. in the 5th or 6th rounds and have him stashed away in case Flynn is a corn on the Kolb type flop.

HaHaHa Arizona gave Kolb a 7 million dollar bonus.
idiots!!!
Gary84Clark is offline  
Old 03-31-2012, 06:29 AM   #987
The Starter
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Born and raised in D.C.....but I'm a New Yorker now....
Posts: 2,198
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I would take Tannehill over Osweiler, given the choice. But I think the Dolphins are far more likely to trade down for a Parcellsian prospect in Osweiler vs. trading up for a guy in Tannehill who their offensive coordinator has already invested a considerable amount of effort into to get him to this point.

I think Tannehill goes 5th overall to the Seahawks in a trade up.
Tannehill will definitely be the 3rd QB drafted in this draft class. I would take Brandon Weeden over Osweiler. And while I'm at it, I'd take Nick Foles over Osweiler too.
REDSKINS4ever is offline  
Old 04-01-2012, 10:13 AM   #988
‎\m/
 
Mattyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 42
Posts: 83,544
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Robert Griffin III Makes Appearance At Washington-Area Memorabilia Show - Redskins Journal
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
Mattyk is offline  
Old 04-01-2012, 10:20 AM   #989
MVP
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NoVa
Age: 26
Posts: 12,110
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Bruce Allen declares,"Unless the Colts take Tannehill with the 1st overall pick, we know which qb we're taking."
mooby is offline  
Old 04-01-2012, 11:00 AM   #990
The Starter
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,099
Re: Redskins agree to trade for No.2 overall pick in 2012 Draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
But I think the Dolphins are far more likely to trade down for a Parcellsian prospect in Osweiler vs. trading up for a guy in Tannehill who their offensive coordinator has already invested a considerable amount of effort into to get him to this point.
Wouldn't Sherman's experience with Tannehill make him much more appealing then Osweiler?
__________________
No longer were NFL coaches dealing inflexibly with spread [QBs] in ways that caused stunted development for players like [A. Smith and Vick] now, the idea is to bring what the quarterback can do, and what he should do, together as an organic whole
30gut is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26534 seconds with 10 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25