Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


Top 10 Pick - Only By Position Needs

NFL Draft Central


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2005, 11:48 PM   #16
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 32
Posts: 5,413
Re: Top 10 Pick - Only By Position Needs

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRT3
SF - QB
Miami - QB or RB
Cleveland - QB or WR
Chicago - RB
Tampa - RB
Tennessee - WR or Corner]
Minnisotta - WR
Arizona - Saftey (They have Iffy)
Washington WR or DE
Detroit - TE or Saftey
My guess:
SF - Definitly a QB
Miami - Benson, hands down. If they end up getting a free agent hb they will go QB here.
Cleveland - QB, or they take Pac Man because of the new definsive mindset
Chicago - Either Edwards or Brown.
Tampa - Whichever Chicago doesnt take
Tennessee - lots of needs here, i dont see them going receiver though. I think they had good depth at receiver even without mason. I think they take dan cody here. They are losing a lot on defense and didnt replace kearse last year.
Minnisotta - They do not take a receiver here, they have receiver but need defense. I would say they take Derrick Johnson here but they just got a line backer. They could use another but I think this is where Spears goes. they have good DTs but could use an end
Arizona - They also definitly dont take a receiver. Arizona take Carnell Williams with this pick.
Washington - Now, assuming there was no trading this leaves the redskins with their choice or Williams or Williamson. Definitly a great opportunity for us to trade down, but you dont factor trades in mock drafts usually. Im going to go out on a limb and say we also do not take a receiver. I think this will be addressed with a medicore player in free agency because gibbs doesnt need or want big name receivers. We take Erasmus James with this pick. He would be top five if he didnt have that injury a year ago. Hes got huge upside as a pass rusher.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-25-2005, 01:09 AM   #17
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 31
Posts: 8,218
Re: Top 10 Pick - Only By Position Needs

Friend of mine who's a huge MN fan assures me that they're getting a receiver. He doesn't know if they're going via draft or via FA but said he is 95% sure they'll get someone to bolster their WR corps.

Rumor has it MN wants to trade Onterrio Smith for Patrick Surtain.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 01:31 AM   #18
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 31
Posts: 16,264
Re: Top 10 Pick - Only By Position Needs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection
I wouldn't doubt it one bit myself and I hope that person is Derrick Mason. Now that HE is available, I like him the best of all the FA players available.
mason is good, but he had some problems with butter fingers last year... I really think MM i the biggest playmaker FA (outside moss), but he wants more money than a rational team would willingly invest in a 32 year old... this isn't a great year to be going after a top rated WR with limited cap space and the 9th pick... and coles may not want to be here, but with the slim pickings I'd be surprised if we let him go and sat with the pick we have... kinda turned into a mess over the last week and the 2006 cap picture is going to look worse.

anyways, i think bucs go RB, we get some sort of answer to WR then look at DE then at C and depth at CB and do what we can to keep pierce around.

Mccants thrash and jacobs arent bad WRs, but if thats all we got next year, i think we'll be hurting...
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 01:36 AM   #19
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 44,636
Re: Top 10 Pick - Only By Position Needs

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
mason is good, but he had some problems with butter fingers last year... I really think MM i the biggest playmaker FA (outside moss), but he wants more money than a rational team would willingly invest in a 32 year old... this isn't a great year to be going after a top rated WR with limited cap space and the 9th pick... and coles may not want to be here, but with the slim pickings I'd be surprised if we let him go and sat with the pick we have... kinda turned into a mess over the last week and the 2006 cap picture is going to look worse.

anyways, i think bucs go RB, we get some sort of answer to WR then look at DE then at C and depth at CB and do what we can to keep pierce around.

Mccants thrash and jacobs arent bad WRs, but if thats all we got next year, i think we'll be hurting...
TG, where have you been? World Tour?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.16263 seconds with 9 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25