Warpath  

Home | Forums | Salary Cap Info | Shop | Donate | Stay Connected




Go Back   Warpath > Redskins Forums > Redskins Locker Room > NFL Draft Central


Draft wrap-up 2013

NFL Draft Central


View Poll Results: Your initial 2013 draft grade for the Skins:
A 24 18.18%
B 92 69.70%
C 15 11.36%
D 1 0.76%
F 0 0%
Voters: 132. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-04-2013, 05:05 PM   #256
The Starter
 
GridIron26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,596
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

Ah well, whatever that works for you..
GridIron26 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 05-05-2013, 07:19 PM   #257
Playmaker
 
HailGreen28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,894
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

Entertaining pics of supposed team needs. I know this is late, but the basic position ranking and couple blurbs are interesting. (Dunno how accurate)
2013 NFL Draft team needs - SBNation.com
HailGreen28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 09:23 PM   #258
Registered User
 
RGIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 626
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

Waab
RGIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 11:27 AM   #259
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

Funny picture for the Eagles. Love how the whole offensive line needs help.

Here's ours. Looks like we fixed what we needed to. How the hell do they call Trent Williams "questionable"? I'd also say our ILBs, DEs and one WR should be "good to go". This thing is severely flawed.



Love seeing red on the offensive line for Dallas...are they going to play their 1st-round Center with 3rd-round talent at one of these guard spots? Also interesting how the other teams have their head coach pictured on the bottom and Dallas gets a Jerry Jones mugshot.

__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster

Last edited by Monkeydad; 05-06-2013 at 11:32 AM.
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 11:35 AM   #260
Living Legend
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma City (Originally from Biloxi, Ms)
Age: 27
Posts: 16,355
They said we need a LT? That already lost it for me. Idiots
__________________
THUNDER UP

"if you're good at something, never do it for free"- The Joker

skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 11:47 AM   #261
Gamebreaker
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pasadena, Md
Age: 47
Posts: 12,880
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

LT and 1 WR spot at least should be good to go on ours. Not sure why Garcon would be considered a questionable, could easily have both WR spots as good to go, but I can understand that no one player really rises above the pack for the second spot. Same with DE, again, we may not have elite talent there, but to say it's questionable seems a bit lame as well.
__________________
Dirtbag59, sending songs to oblivion 1 writer at a time.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 12:03 PM   #262
The Starter
 
donofriose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,959
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
LT and 1 WR spot at least should be good to go on ours. Not sure why Garcon would be considered a questionable, could easily have both WR spots as good to go, but I can understand that no one player really rises above the pack for the second spot. Same with DE, again, we may not have elite talent there, but to say it's questionable seems a bit lame as well.
I think they were just saying a DE in general, a WR in a general and a tackle in general. Not left or right. I thought the same thing but then I went to the lions page and checked the lions and it said WR questionable. So I'm assuming they don't mean Calvin Johnson and mean the lions could just improve at the receiver position.
And if that's what they mean then they would be right. Redskins could improve the dline, the receiving core and obviously at the tackle positions.
donofriose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 01:27 PM   #263
Registered User
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,527
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

This was also published BEFORE the draft, not after.
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 02:17 PM   #264
MVP
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 11,216
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by donofriose View Post
I think they were just saying a DE in general, a WR in a general and a tackle in general. Not left or right. I thought the same thing but then I went to the lions page and checked the lions and it said WR questionable. So I'm assuming they don't mean Calvin Johnson and mean the lions could just improve at the receiver position.
And if that's what they mean then they would be right. Redskins could improve the dline, the receiving core and obviously at the tackle positions.

This.

They aren't denoting the side of the position in need, just the position itself. It would have been nice if they expanded and even noted the sides that need help.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 02:59 PM   #265
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 35
Posts: 16,275
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
This was also published BEFORE the draft, not after.
Trent was elite before the draft too.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 04:56 PM   #266
Registered User
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,527
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkeydad View Post
Trent was elite before the draft too.
And if you read the posts above mine, you would see that they are referring to the tackle position in general, not specifically the LT.
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 05:43 PM   #267
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 32
Posts: 16,279
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
And if you read the posts above mine, you would see that they are referring to the tackle position in general, not specifically the LT.
and the pic says we need two OTs, so, that's the RT and the what? center tackle?

they're not talking about depth. so that means garcon and trent are questionable, which makes that pic-chart stupid.
__________________
Who says shameless self promotion is stupid? oh yeah, that was me... Click For Tunes!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 06:10 PM   #268
Registered User
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,527
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy View Post
and the pic says we need two OTs, so, that's the RT and the what? center tackle?

they're not talking about depth. so that means garcon and trent are questionable, which makes that pic-chart stupid.
They're are saying OT, not LT.

A lot of publications will do this because in their computers when they tell the computers to highlight OT, it highlights OT and since there are 2 OTs on the field at the time it highlights them both.
2013 NFL Draft team needs: Seattle Seahawks - SBNation.com
Look at Seattles situation which is similar to ours; they have a great LT but no RT.

The best LT in the NFL is Duane Brown of Houston, heres what Houstons chart. 2013 NFL Draft team needs: Houston Texans - SBNation.com

They need help there as well. Is it stupid that they can't just highlight one spot instead of two? Yeah, but they aren't saying or trying to say that Trents bad.
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 06:58 PM   #269
Playmaker
 
HailGreen28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,894
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy View Post
and the pic says we need two OTs, so, that's the RT and the what? center tackle?

they're not talking about depth. so that means garcon and trent are questionable, which makes that pic-chart stupid.
Well, our RTs have been turnstiles against the pass rush, and Garcon couldn't stay healthy last season (missed 6 games and played hurt others)....

Thought the charts were entertaining even if not wholly accurate. Some of the coaches pics are hilarious. Still interested in discrepancies of the other teams charts.
HailGreen28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2013, 11:35 PM   #270
Impact Rookie
 
ethat001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 741
Re: Draft wrap-up 2013

Why did Thomas and Rambo fall so far?


I"m sure it has been discussed somewhere over the past 1-2 weeks, but... everyone is saying they could start, both were supposed to have been drafted 2-3 rounds higher, but... they weren't. I realize the drugs with Rambo, but just wanted to see what everyone else was thinking by passing them up. A lot of teams passed on these guys round after round, and picked up much lower ranked safeties ahead of them. If we get "steals", I'd love it, but makes me wonder.


Player - Projected Round - Actual Round
Vaccaro - 1 ===> 1 (15)
Eric Reid - 1-2 ===> 1 (18)
Matt Elam - 1-2 ===> 1 (32)
Cyprien - 1-2 ===> 2 (33)
Swearninger - 2-3 ===> 2 (57)
TJ McDonald - 3-4 ===> 3 (71)
JJ Wilcox - 3 ===> 3 (80)
S.Williams - 3-4 ===> 3 (84)
D.Harmon NA ===> 3 (91)
D.Williams 5 ===> 4 (105)
S.Thomas 3-4 ===> 4 (111)
P. Thomas - 2-3 ===> 4 (119)
E.Wolff 6 ===> 5 (136)
J.Meeks ===> 5 (143)
C.Taylor 7 ===> 5 (152)
J.Evans 4 ===> 6 (169)
J.Slaughter ===> 6(175)
B.Rambo 3-4 ===> 6 (191)
ethat001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site is not officially affiliated with the Washington Redskins or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.32666 seconds with 10 queries

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25