![]() |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the Jason Campbell pick? | |||
| Yes | | 11 | 32.35% |
| No | | 23 | 67.65% |
| Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 589
| Jason Campbell I don't think we will draft Jason Campbell for a couple reasons. 1) is I don't think Gibbs is too worried about down the road considering all the financial problems we will be in and there is almost no way to avoid. 2) If we draft Campbell we will have 4 quarterbacks on the team and I don't know too much about the cap but we would probably cut burnell and I think there's almost no way we can afford that. 3) Why would we draft a couple days before the draft to get a quarterback that may not even be there at 25? There may be answers to this but I personally don't think we will draft him. I hope we get mike williams with the first pick and a defensive player with the second, or even one of the cornerbacks with the first pick and heath miller with the second to open up options from the tight end position. |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #2 |
| Born a Rocker,Die a Rocker ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 6,813
| Jason Campbell With the 25th pick. Jump ship if you choose...the pick is good with me |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Mr. Brightside Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Fairfax, Virginia Age: 27
Posts: 4,423
| Re: Jason Campbell Quote:
__________________ "I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Raleigh, NC Age: 26
Posts: 447
| Re: Jason Campbell Not much of a surprise to me. I figured he would be here. I like the pick, gonna put some good motivation into P. Ramsey this season. Now the question is, how long will Ramsey be here. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Arlington
Posts: 35
| Yep, this confirms it ... the FO is smoking crack. I'm not sure that I agreed with their first pick, but it least it made some sense. This may be the stupidest thing they've done since, well, it hasn't been too long (Goodbye to Coles, Pierce, Smoot, etc.). Campbell may be a wonderful player, but they need another quarterback like a bear needs toilet paper ... |
| | |
| | #6 |
| The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
| Re: Jason Campbell i'm not upset but i'm not happy either. i'm kinda confused. i thuoght the skins would goin a different direction. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 47
| Re: Jason Campbell I do think its a good idea to add depth everywhere...but I don't think this draft was one in which we had the luxury of drafting for depth. We still have needs at WR, TE, and DE...and few draft picks to fill them. In my opinion it was a wasted pick, especially with Heath Miller, Dan Cody, and Roddy White still on the board...especially since we don't have a second rounder. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Crofton, MD Age: 43
Posts: 907
| Re: Jason Campbell I don't like this pick....if they were gonna get a QB, I really thought they would have traded back to round 2 or later. Maybe they tried, but couldn't get a good offer... Hopefully, Patrick will step up and we will have a quality back-up QB, plus the washed up veteran. Bye-bye Tim! |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Karma Chameleon (I come and go) Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Annapolis, MD Age: 28
Posts: 3,061
| Re: Jason Campbell Now what's the depth chart? Do you put your second first round pick at #3? Or do you put $43 million at #3? Joe says that Ramsey is the starter, but I don't know. Joe Gibbs pretty much lied when he said that they were going to get Ramsey some weapons. It wasn't a smoke screen. It was right before the draft. I saw this coming, so I'm not even furious. It's what I expected. I don't know what they're thinking, personally.
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Karma Chameleon (I come and go) Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Annapolis, MD Age: 28
Posts: 3,061
| Re: Jason Campbell On the plus side, however, I hate me some Tim Hasselbeck. So good riddance.
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: New Jersey Age: 34
Posts: 270
| Re: Jason Campbell Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Camp Scrub Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 47
| Re: Jason Campbell what picks do we have left? |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Raleigh, NC Age: 26
Posts: 447
| Re: Jason Campbell Seriously, I do not know what people think when it comes to this FO. But no one should be surprised. They never do what you think there gonna do. Kinda funny how a lot of people bought into the whole smoke screen thing. I think Gibbs doesn't really trust Ramsey and is bringing in a qb that threw for 60% completion percentage. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Propane and propane accessories Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, TX Age: 44
Posts: 4,576
| Re: Jason Campbell And we can't dump brunell. I'm not pleased, and it makes the FO look like goons: targeting a guy before the draft, alowing it to get out (to pastabelly, no less) what they were going to do, and then going into paranoid, nixon-style leak control--wow. And now we have a brewing QB controversy, no new wideout, no 1st rounder next year, and we get the ass-clown FO award of the year. BUt just imagine if Aaron Rogers hadn't slipped and Green Bay picked Campbell. Wow. NO wonder GIbbs looked so tense when he went on TV after #9. They got very lucky, assuming this was their goal all along.
__________________ Hail from Houston! |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Crofton, MD Age: 43
Posts: 907
| Re: Jason Campbell Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |