Demographics

BleedBurgundy · 07-23-2004, 08:28 PM

Well, I was just reading a thread regarding our future salary cap situation and from what I understand, the cap's size will grow much more in the event of a lucrative tv deal. But the deal won't be as rich as we all hope if the economy is in the tank... This line of thought made me think of Politics and brought up this question: What are the political demographics of The Warpath? Or more clearly, who will you guys be voting for come November? :FIREdevil

Daseal · 07-23-2004, 09:26 PM

Kerry - Edwards.

That Guy · 07-23-2004, 09:43 PM

more libertarian, tend to vote republican... still on the fence though... definately not kerry, maybe not bush, i'll wait a bit longer to decide.

ronsmith52 · 07-23-2004, 10:05 PM

I'm voting for Gibbs-Bugel

Shane · 07-23-2004, 11:07 PM

I am voting for Kerry-Edwards. I detest the Bush administration. Forget the economy - the world may not survive 4 more years of these patent lunatics.

skins009 · 07-23-2004, 11:36 PM

I'm not really into politics and am definetly an independant. But I really hate Bush and want anybody but him

skinsfanthru&thru · 07-23-2004, 11:50 PM

I still am unsure but I do know I don't want an ex-injury lawyer being VP with the possibility he might become the President. And Kerry has yet to take a solid stand on anything of importance from what I've read and heard. Bush definitely has his faults as well so I'm not sure where my votes gonna go this election.

BrudLee · 07-24-2004, 12:24 AM

I'll tell you who I'm voting for!

Bill Lee for Governor!

Skins fan 44 · 07-25-2004, 03:21 PM

Bush/Chaney

Daseal · 07-25-2004, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Kerry has yet to take a solid stand on anything of importance from what I've read and heard.

Took a stand against the toxic waste dump the Bush administration wants to put in either Nevada or New mexico!

dieselhog · 07-26-2004, 12:12 PM

I'm in England, so I'm not even in the hunt. I have to say though, the perception here is that Bush is an idiot of moronic proportions.

Weopens of mass destruction? It was all bullshit. Thing is, we knew it was from day one. It was just an excuse.

They never should have mentioned weopons, just that they wanted to get rid of Saddam.

I hope Blair and Bush go wherever it is that people who love to kill civilians and there own soilders go.

Redskins_P · 07-26-2004, 12:23 PM

Kerry/Edwards. I just can't stand Bush. I don't know if Kerry is any better, but I just want Bush out.

skinsfanthru&thru · 07-26-2004, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dieselhog

I hope Blair and Bush go wherever it is that people who love to kill civilians and there own soilders go.

Yeah I'm just sure they were cheering their hearts out anytime the deathtoll increased among civilians and their troops.

Riggo44 · 07-26-2004, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronsmith52

I'm voting for Gibbs-Bugel

dieselhog · 07-27-2004, 06:46 AM

I'm not suggesting they were, Skins fan thru & thru, but what I am saying is that they set a course for war REGARDLESS of the facts.

Over here we kept being told that 'We will go to war because they have Weopons of mass destruction.'

Now a sizeable portion of our media recognised it for what it was... bullshit.

They had an agenda.

The agenda was getting rid of Saddam - that's fine. I agree he had to go. They just should not have LIED about their motives.

WHERE ARE THE WEOPONS?

Too many people (on all sides) have died for this crap.

07-23-2004, 08:28 PM	#1
BleedBurgundy Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 4,433	Demographics Well, I was just reading a thread regarding our future salary cap situation and from what I understand, the cap's size will grow much more in the event of a lucrative tv deal. But the deal won't be as rich as we all hope if the economy is in the tank... This line of thought made me think of Politics and brought up this question: What are the political demographics of The Warpath? Or more clearly, who will you guys be voting for come November? :FIREdevil

07-24-2004, 12:24 AM	#8
BrudLee Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE Posts: 3,494	I'll tell you who I'm voting for! Bill Lee for Governor! __________________ There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.

07-25-2004, 03:21 PM	#9
Skins fan 44 Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Brazil, IN Age: 42 Posts: 883	Bush/Chaney __________________ HTTR!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-23-2004, 09:26 PM	#2
Daseal Puppy Kicker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, Virginia Age: 30 Posts: 8,055	Kerry - Edwards.

07-23-2004, 09:43 PM	#3
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Springfield, VA Age: 30 Posts: 15,617	more libertarian, tend to vote republican... still on the fence though... definately not kerry, maybe not bush, i'll wait a bit longer to decide.

07-23-2004, 10:05 PM	#4
ronsmith52 Camp Scrub Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 12	I'm voting for Gibbs-Bugel

07-23-2004, 11:07 PM	#5
Shane Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 277	I am voting for Kerry-Edwards. I detest the Bush administration. Forget the economy - the world may not survive 4 more years of these patent lunatics.

07-23-2004, 11:36 PM	#6
skins009 Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 528	I'm not really into politics and am definetly an independant. But I really hate Bush and want anybody but him

07-23-2004, 11:50 PM	#7
skinsfanthru&thru Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 32 Posts: 3,504	I still am unsure but I do know I don't want an ex-injury lawyer being VP with the possibility he might become the President. And Kerry has yet to take a solid stand on anything of importance from what I've read and heard. Bush definitely has his faults as well so I'm not sure where my votes gonna go this election.

07-26-2004, 12:12 PM	#11
dieselhog Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Bolton, Lancashire Age: 41 Posts: 166	I'm in England, so I'm not even in the hunt. I have to say though, the perception here is that Bush is an idiot of moronic proportions. Weopens of mass destruction? It was all bullshit. Thing is, we knew it was from day one. It was just an excuse. They never should have mentioned weopons, just that they wanted to get rid of Saddam. I hope Blair and Bush go wherever it is that people who love to kill civilians and there own soilders go.

07-26-2004, 12:23 PM	#12
Redskins_P Fight for old DC! Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Sterling, VA Age: 34 Posts: 4,065	Kerry/Edwards. I just can't stand Bush. I don't know if Kerry is any better, but I just want Bush out.

07-27-2004, 06:46 AM	#15
dieselhog Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Bolton, Lancashire Age: 41 Posts: 166	I'm not suggesting they were, Skins fan thru & thru, but what I am saying is that they set a course for war REGARDLESS of the facts. Over here we kept being told that 'We will go to war because they have Weopons of mass destruction.' Now a sizeable portion of our media recognised it for what it was... bullshit. They had an agenda. The agenda was getting rid of Saddam - that's fine. I agree he had to go. They just should not have LIED about their motives. WHERE ARE THE WEOPONS? Too many people (on all sides) have died for this crap.

Demographics

Parking Lot