Reputation system: stay or go

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 04-24-2008, 11:43 PM

I got neg. rep points for having my location say inside your girlfriend LOL and the guy called me fat it was a trumatic experience LOL

Dirtbag59 · 04-25-2008, 12:34 AM

I think the rep system is actually pretty good. It discourages flaming and as others have alluded to it makes people focus on quality rather then quanity when it comes to posting. As with the flaming I'll argue that the guys over at ES, who don't have a rep system, flame a lot. Of course the mods don't stop the guys over there from creating pointless threads, and as expected people get annoyed so I guess a rep system isn't really the saving grace, but then again maybe it prevents people from being dicks over here for no good reason.

I also like how the people who give rep points remain anonymous since the whole point of a rep system is to reward people, not reward yourself. I mean sometimes you can tell, but very rarely have I ever rewarded someone with rep just because they gave me a few points.

And I mean it's not like it prevents people from disagreeing on points and debating, in fact the only time I've seen people get bad rep points is when they come in and say or do something that is so utterly stupid that it's just beyond reasoning.

So I say keep the rep system, I mean it's not the most important thing but I believe it does it's part in keeping the peace around here.

Edit: Another good thing about the system is that so far I've only seen one or two people asking for rep points, which is a miracle compared to other places with the same system.

Dirtbag59 · 04-25-2008, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

I got neg. rep points for having my location say inside your girlfriend LOL and the guy called me fat it was a trumatic experience LOL

I'm willing to bet that your girlfriend was the one who gave you those neg rep points.

EARTHQUAKE2689 · 04-25-2008, 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

I'm willing to bet that your girlfriend was the one who gave you those neg rep points.

nope it was 4musumc or however u spell his name

70Chip · 04-25-2008, 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrudLee

Personally, I think it's underused. I say this because I only have two green rectangles, and I crap gold.

Its true what the genius says. He has crapped gold. Human nature will never allow him to get his due because he avoids controversy and is not perceived as a power player so no one kisses up to him.

KLHJ2 · 04-25-2008, 08:29 AM

I say get rid of it because it will never be used properly. However, if there are those who wish to keep it, then give the rep power solely to the mods. That way retaliation is prevented when 2 people get into a disagreement. If an opinionated moderator is in a heated discussion (not solely referring to Matty), then he or she can not dish out negative rep to the antagonist. It would have to be a Mod not participating in the discussion and the negative rep must be warranted.

This way all rep is dealt out fairly from the visionaries and moderators of the board. Isn't that part of a moderator’s job anyway?

Hog1 · 04-25-2008, 08:56 AM

Because we are having to deal with threads to defend or condemn it, to often, I think it has become a distraction

onlydarksets · 04-25-2008, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry

I say get rid of it because it will never be used properly. However, if there are those who wish to keep it, then give the rep power solely to the mods. That way retaliation is prevented when 2 people get into a disagreement. If an opinionated moderator is in a heated discussion (not solely referring to Matty), then he or she can not dish out negative rep to the antagonist. It would have to be a Mod not participating in the discussion and the negative rep must be warranted.

This way all rep is dealt out fairly from the visionaries and moderators of the board. Isn't that part of a moderator’s job anyway?

I agree -that's probably the best scenario. It's also gives the mods power to discipline smaller offenses without threatening a suspension or ban.

onlydarksets · 04-25-2008, 10:26 AM

I also don't get the "You must spread reputation around" thing. I tried to give him +rep for that post I quoted, and it won't let me. What's the deal with that?

SmootSmack · 04-25-2008, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onlydarksets

I agree -that's probably the best scenario. It's also gives the mods power to discipline smaller offenses without threatening a suspension or ban.

Well we have the infraction system for that too.

JWsleep · 04-25-2008, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog1

Because we are having to deal with threads to defend or condemn it, to often, I think it has become a distraction

That's what I was thinking as well.

onlydarksets · 04-25-2008, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Well we have the infraction system for that too.

OK - I don't know what that is. If it does the trick, then ditch the negatives entirely.

Dirtbag59 · 04-29-2008, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry

I say get rid of it because it will never be used properly. However, if there are those who wish to keep it, then give the rep power solely to the mods. That way retaliation is prevented when 2 people get into a disagreement. If an opinionated moderator is in a heated discussion (not solely referring to Matty), then he or she can not dish out negative rep to the antagonist. It would have to be a Mod not participating in the discussion and the negative rep must be warranted.

This way all rep is dealt out fairly from the visionaries and moderators of the board. Isn't that part of a moderator’s job anyway?

I disagree. If the Mods become the only one with rep power, then this place will become brown nose central. Retaliation is rare, and usually the people that retaliate against people that give them negative rep for doing something stupid don't really have a whole lot of rep power to begin with, so if one of them does give you negative rep you're only out like 1 or 2 points. Plus there will probably be about 10 other people to give negative rep to the person starting shit. The most recent example I can think of is

Quote:

Originally Posted by offfiss

I wish the Skins had a TE the calibur of Shockey. The guy backs up his loud mouth.

I doubt I was the only one that gave Offiss negative rep on this baseless argument, but I have never given negative rep to someone for disagreeing with me.

Mattyk · 04-29-2008, 05:54 PM

The rep system will stay for now with one modification. Now, nobody can see who rep came from. Previously premium members could see who left them rep. Now it's going to be anonymous for all. I think people got too caught up with who was leaving them negative rep and that cause people to retaliate.

I'd rather not leave rep in the hands of the mods alone. We already get accused of enough stupid shit.

Big C · 04-29-2008, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

I got neg. rep points for having my location say inside your girlfriend LOL and the guy called me fat it was a trumatic experience LOL

i got negative rep points for saying i was ok with fassel being head coach...lol

View Poll Results: Reputation system: stay or go
Stay	33	60.00%
Go	22	40.00%
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll

04-24-2008, 11:43 PM	#31
EARTHQUAKE2689 You did WHAT?!? Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna. Age: 26 Posts: 12,388	Re: Reputation system: stay or go I got neg. rep points for having my location say inside your girlfriend LOL and the guy called me fat it was a trumatic experience LOL __________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpp3ycMvQd0 This is why you need Mentos. To justify your questionable problem solving skills. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7geP5ev0VI Awesome isn't it.

04-25-2008, 12:34 AM	#32
Dirtbag59 Naega jeil jal naga Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 29 Posts: 14,750	Re: Reputation system: stay or go I think the rep system is actually pretty good. It discourages flaming and as others have alluded to it makes people focus on quality rather then quanity when it comes to posting. As with the flaming I'll argue that the guys over at ES, who don't have a rep system, flame a lot. Of course the mods don't stop the guys over there from creating pointless threads, and as expected people get annoyed so I guess a rep system isn't really the saving grace, but then again maybe it prevents people from being dicks over here for no good reason. I also like how the people who give rep points remain anonymous since the whole point of a rep system is to reward people, not reward yourself. I mean sometimes you can tell, but very rarely have I ever rewarded someone with rep just because they gave me a few points. And I mean it's not like it prevents people from disagreeing on points and debating, in fact the only time I've seen people get bad rep points is when they come in and say or do something that is so utterly stupid that it's just beyond reasoning. So I say keep the rep system, I mean it's not the most important thing but I believe it does it's part in keeping the peace around here. Edit: Another good thing about the system is that so far I've only seen one or two people asking for rep points, which is a miracle compared to other places with the same system. __________________ "It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG

04-25-2008, 08:29 AM	#36
KLHJ2 Inactive Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: DC Metro Area Age: 36 Posts: 5,829	Re: Reputation system: stay or go I say get rid of it because it will never be used properly. However, if there are those who wish to keep it, then give the rep power solely to the mods. That way retaliation is prevented when 2 people get into a disagreement. If an opinionated moderator is in a heated discussion (not solely referring to Matty), then he or she can not dish out negative rep to the antagonist. It would have to be a Mod not participating in the discussion and the negative rep must be warranted. This way all rep is dealt out fairly from the visionaries and moderators of the board. Isn't that part of a moderator’s job anyway?

04-25-2008, 08:56 AM	#37
Hog1 Quietly Dominating the East Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Naples, Florida Posts: 9,576	Re: Reputation system: stay or go Because we are having to deal with threads to defend or condemn it, to often, I think it has become a distraction __________________ Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... *“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs*

04-25-2008, 10:26 AM	#39
onlydarksets Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: all up in your business Posts: 2,693	Re: Reputation system: stay or go I also don't get the "You must spread reputation around" thing. I tried to give him +rep for that post I quoted, and it won't let me. What's the deal with that? __________________ Stop reading my signature.

04-29-2008, 05:54 PM	#44
Mattyk ‎\m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 42 Posts: 84,614	Re: Reputation system: stay or go The rep system will stay for now with one modification. Now, nobody can see who rep came from. Previously premium members could see who left them rep. Now it's going to be anonymous for all. I think people got too caught up with who was leaving them negative rep and that cause people to retaliate. I'd rather not leave rep in the hands of the mods alone. We already get accused of enough stupid shit. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Reputation system: stay or go

Parking Lot