![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #31 |
| Playmaker Join Date: May 2004 Location: MA Age: 32
Posts: 2,836
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? Let's not forget that Obama only needs to carry Kerry's states plus Ohio to win. For all the talk of Dean's 50 state strategy at the end of the day the dems will know where to campaign. |
| | |
| Advertisements |
| | #32 | |
| Eternally Legendary ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 33
Posts: 9,738
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? Quote:
__________________ RG3, RGIII, RG三, RG३, RGγʹ, RGג, RG٣, RG๓, RG..., RG셋, RGԳ! | |
| | |
| | #33 |
| MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 51
Posts: 10,448
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? 70, do you rally believe that stuff? or are you just trying to liven things up? right now, there are republicans that would vote for H. R. Puffin-stuff, if he were their nominee. maybe once in a while you should try thinking outside the box. is this country really in better shape after 8 years of Bush? because i would be willing to bet you voted for him twice. whoever wins this general election has one helluva of a mess to clean up. do we really need someone who agrees with what has been going on in this country for the last 30 years, or someone who seems to want to try something new? that is pretty much how this election boils down
__________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Eternally Legendary ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 33
Posts: 9,738
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? Republicans got murdered in 3 recent special elections in heavily republican districts the GOP held for decades. The GOP is going to get clobbered come November and anyone that doesn't think so is delusional. The jig is up!
__________________ RG3, RGIII, RG三, RG३, RGγʹ, RGג, RG٣, RG๓, RG..., RG셋, RGԳ! |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? Sorry, saden, but thinking that anything in politics is a sure thing is delusional. I hope you are right, though, and I will happily eat crow on this one.
__________________ Stop reading my signature. |
| | |
| | #36 | |
| Eternally Legendary ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 33
Posts: 9,738
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? Quote:
The dipshit in Mississippi ran on the following platform and got clobbered by 8 points. I love it.
__________________ RG3, RGIII, RG三, RG३, RGγʹ, RGג, RG٣, RG๓, RG..., RG셋, RGԳ! | |
| | |
| | #37 | |
| The Starter Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,554
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? Quote:
__________________ It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. | |
| | |
| | #38 | |
| Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 34
Posts: 8,317
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #39 | |
| Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI Age: 25
Posts: 15,152
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? Quote:
1) People who agree with the last 30 years 2) People who want to try something new. Can't we be somewhere in between (like, say, McCain)? What is the world coming to?
__________________ Shanahan: “The bad thing is he's [Sav Rocca] probably our best offensive weapon and that’s not good.” | |
| | |
| | #40 | |
| Gamebreaker Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 34
Posts: 14,885
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? Quote:
IF someone votes for or against Obama simply because he's black, that's not racist, it's just ignorant and stupid. IF someone votes for or against Clinton simply because she's a woman, that's not sexist, it's just ignorant and stupid. IF someone votes for or against McCain simply because he's an older man, that's not *create new PC term*-ist, it's just ignorant and stupid. | |
| | |
| | #41 | |
| Eternally Legendary ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 33
Posts: 9,738
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? Quote:
OMG, you can't possibly be serious. Ignorant and stupid? I think you might want to actually check the definition of what racism is. Unless I am not aware of my own ignorants I do believe not voting for someone because they are black rather than on the merits of their character and position IS racist (it falls under "discrimination or prejudice based on race" definition). p.s. Same principle applies in sexism and ageism which is NOT a new PC term.
__________________ RG3, RGIII, RG三, RG३, RGγʹ, RGג, RG٣, RG๓, RG..., RG셋, RGԳ! | |
| | |
| | #42 |
| \m/ ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 40
Posts: 73,194
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? To me racism and sexism stems from stupidity and ignorance. |
| | |
| | #43 |
| Eternally Legendary ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Seattle Age: 33
Posts: 9,738
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? Exactly, to be racist is to be ignorant and stupid. Let's not however redefine racism to it's simpler form because it's really more nefarious than ignorance and stupidity. When someone says I'm never voting for a black man what rational could there possibly be for their position? He's less capable? His presidency would be detrimental to white people?
__________________ RG3, RGIII, RG三, RG३, RGγʹ, RGג, RG٣, RG๓, RG..., RG셋, RGԳ! |
| | |
| | #44 |
| MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lancaster,pa Age: 51
Posts: 10,448
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? good post SC skins fan. and gtripp, show me where McCain stands in between an issue?
__________________ "It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
| | |
| | #45 |
| Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Manassas Age: 42
Posts: 3,048
| Re: Should Hillary Hang It Up? Truman was the sitting President in 1948. In 1952 with Eisenhower vs. Stevenson, neither was an incumbent. Also 1928, Hoover vs. Al Smith. Hoover was Secretary of Commerce and Smith was the Catholic Governor of New York. 1908 Taft vs. W.J. Bryan. Taft had been Secretary of War and Bryan was the oft-defeated populist Democrat. 1896 McKinley vs. Bryan. McKInley was Governor of Ohio, I believe. Also there could be an interesting discussion about wether or not Grover Cleveland should be considered an incumbent in 1892. He was the non-consecutive President. I guess he should NOT be considered an incumbent as the stink of office had surely faded somewhat. Perhaps someone else can pick up the trail from here. Some of you could stand doing a little research.
__________________ This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |